Supreme Court of India

18,343 judgments

Year:

Siddharth Murarka v. Supreme Court of India

20 Jan 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Dinesh Maheshwari; Hrishikesh Roy · 2021 INSC 34

The Supreme Court permitted a sole proprietor Advocate on Record to use a professional style on letterheads and Vakalatnamas while leaving any broader change to registration styles to the rule-making authorities.

civil petition_allowed Significant Advocate on Record Supreme Court Rules professional style sole proprietorship

Siddharth Murarka v. Supreme Court of India

20 Jan 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Dinesh Maheshwari; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court permitted an Advocate on Record to use a sole proprietorship style name on letterheads and Vakalatnamas while leaving broader changes to registration styles to Rule-making authorities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Advocate on Record Supreme Court Rules, 2013 sole proprietorship partnership firm

State of Uttarakhand v. Sureshwati

20 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Navin Sinha; Indu Malhotra · 2021 INSC 32
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that absence of a domestic enquiry does not automatically invalidate termination; the Labour Court may examine evidence on merits, and the employee must prove continuous service to claim protection against retrenchment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry termination of service abandonment of service continuous employment

State of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Sureshwati

20 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Navin Sinha; Indu Malhotra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that absence of a domestic enquiry does not invalidate termination if the employer justifies it with evidence, and the employee fails to prove continuous employment and illegal termination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry abandonment of service continuous employment Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Bajranga v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

19 Jan 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Dinesh Maheshwari; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that acquisition of surplus land under the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling Act must await the decision of a pending civil suit on title, and failure to comply with statutory procedural safeguards invalidates such acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 surplus land acquisition Section 11(4) proviso civil court jurisdiction

Bajranga v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

19 Jan 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Dinesh Maheshwari; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that acquisition of surplus land under the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling Act must be stayed pending a civil court's decision on title disputes, and failure to comply with statutory procedural safeguards vitiates acquisition proceedings.

property appeal_allowed Significant Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 Section 11(4) proviso bar of civil court jurisdiction natural justice

Lakhvir Singh v. State of Punjab

19 Jan 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act to appellants under 21 at the time of offence despite mandatory minimum sentence under Section 397 IPC, emphasizing rehabilitation over strict imprisonment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 397 IPC mandatory minimum sentence young offenders

Lakhvir Singh v. The State of Punjab & Anr.

19 Jan 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that young offenders under 21 years at the time of offence are entitled to probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, notwithstanding the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 397 IPC, and released the appellants on probation after serving half their sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 397 IPC mandatory minimum sentence probation

Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang

19 Jan 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; B. R. Gavai
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held the respondents guilty of civil contempt for wilful disobedience of its consent orders regarding joint management of a family company, upheld the validity of CLB’s intervention to resolve deadlock, and emphasized strict compliance with court undertakings.

civil conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court civil contempt family settlement company management

Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang

19 Jan 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that wilful disobedience of its consent orders in a family company dispute constitutes civil contempt, upheld the validity of statutory authority orders regulating company management, and emphasized compliance with court undertakings and statutory provisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil contempt consent order family settlement joint management

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. PANDARINATHAN GOVINDARAJULU

19 Jan 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA; AJAY RASTOGI
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that environmental clearance for National Highway expansion is required only if both length and additional land acquisition thresholds are exceeded, disallowed segmentation to evade clearance, and directed expert review on permissible segmentation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant environmental clearance National Highway expansion Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 right of way

The National Highways Authority of India v. Pandarinathan Govindarajulu

19 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that environmental clearance is required for National Highway expansion projects exceeding 100 km only if additional land acquisition exceeds specified limits, disallowed segmentation to evade clearance, and directed an expert committee to examine segmentation permissibility.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant environmental clearance National Highway expansion Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 right of way

In Re: Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

19 Jan 2021

The Supreme Court issued uniform Draft Rules of Criminal Practice, 2021, reforming evidence recording, objections, and trial procedures to ensure clarity, fairness, and expeditious criminal trials across India.

criminal other Significant criminal trial uniform rules evidence recording objections to evidence

Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.

18 Jan 2021 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the Chief Justice's power to prescribe educational qualifications for High Court promotions, validating classification based on graduation and setting seniority based on qualification acquisition, thereby allowing the appeals and reversing the High Court's quashing of the Office Order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant High Court Staff Rules Promotion qualifications Educational qualification classification Article 14

Dipika Jagatram Sahani v. Union of India

13 Jan 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court directed reopening of Anganwadi Centres outside containment zones with adherence to nutritional standards and monitoring, affirming the State's statutory and constitutional duty to provide nutritional support to vulnerable women and children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Anganwadi Centres National Food Security Act, 2013 Integrated Child Development Services Scheme Supplementary Nutrition

Dipika Jagatram Sahani v. Union of India

13 Jan 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court directed reopening of Anganwadi Centres outside containment zones with adherence to nutritional standards and safety protocols, affirming the State's constitutional and statutory duty to ensure nutritional support to women and children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Anganwadi Centres National Food Security Act, 2013 Integrated Child Development Services Scheme nutritional support

Tamil Nadu Housing Board v. Abdul Salam Sarkar

13 Jan 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that interest on solatium is payable in execution proceedings if not expressly rejected earlier, allowing respondents to claim such interest from 19 September 2001 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interest on solatium Land Acquisition Act 1894 execution proceedings reference court

Tamil Nadu Housing Board v. Abdul Salam Sarkar

13 Jan 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that interest on solatium under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is payable in pending execution proceedings if not expressly rejected earlier, from the date of the Sunder judgment, affirming the respondents’ entitlement despite closure of earlier execution petitions.

property appeal_dismissed Significant interest on solatium Land Acquisition Act 1894 execution proceedings Gurpreet Singh judgment

S.Sundara Kumar v. State

13 Jan 2021 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court confirmed the conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act but reduced the sentence from two years to one year and one month considering the appellant's age and time already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 13(2)

The Mavilyai Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut & Anr.

12 Jan 2021 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that co-operative societies registered as primary agricultural credit societies must be actually engaged in agricultural credit activities during the relevant year to claim deductions under section 80P(2)(a)(i), and mere registration is insufficient.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant section 80P Income Tax Act primary agricultural credit society co-operative society deduction under Income Tax