Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

S. KARTHIK v. N. SUBHASH CHAND JAIN

23 Sep 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI; B.V. NAGARATHNA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a secured creditor must provide a fresh 30 days' notice before auction under SARFAESI Act rules, invalidating a sale conducted on only 10 days' notice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(8) Security Interest Enforcement Rules 30 days notice

S. KARTHIK v. N. SUBHASH CHAND JAIN

23 Sep 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI; B.V. NAGARATHNA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a sale under the SARFAESI Act without a mandatory 30-day notice is invalid, quashing the auction sale conducted on insufficient notice and affirming the borrower's right of redemption until completion of sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Security Interest Enforcement 30-day notice Equitable mortgage

Bihari v. State of U.P.

23 Sep 2021 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the delayed Special Leave Petition challenging enhanced land acquisition compensation, upholding the High Court's award of Rs. 28.12 per square yard.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act compensation delay in filing petition Special Leave Petition

Bihari v. State of U.P.

23 Sep 2021 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed a delayed Special Leave Petition challenging enhanced land acquisition compensation, upholding the High Court's award of Rs. 28.12 per square yard.

property appeal_dismissed Land Acquisition Act compensation delay in filing Special Leave Petition

National Highways Authority of India v. Madhukar Kumar

23 Sep 2021 · K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that locating a toll plaza within municipal limits without recording reasons and without the highway being primarily for local residents violates Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee Rules, 2008, and set aside the impugned toll plaza location.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant toll plaza National Highways Fee Rules 2008 Rule 8 executing authority

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & OTHERS v. MADHUKAR KUMAR & OTHERS

23 Sep 2021 · K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that locating a toll plaza within municipal limits without recorded reasons violates Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee Rules, 2008, and upheld the direction to shift the toll plaza beyond municipal limits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant toll plaza Rule 8 National Highways Fee Rules 2008 recording of reasons

D.K. Agrawal v. Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

23 Sep 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the ICAI Council must independently consider evidence and record reasoned findings in disciplinary proceedings, setting aside unreasoned orders and remitting the matter for fresh consideration.

professional_regulatory_law appeal_allowed Significant Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 Disciplinary Committee Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants professional misconduct

The Jamia Masjid v. Sri K V Rudrappa

23 Sep 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Vikram Nath; Hima Kohli · 2021 INSC 528

The Supreme Court held that a representative suit under Section 92 CPC does not conclusively decide title for res judicata and that prior suits and compromise decrees did not bar the present suit seeking declaration of wakf property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata representative suit Section 92 CPC Wakf property

The Jamia Masjid v. Sri K V Rudrappa

23 Sep 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Vikram Nath; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that a representative suit under Section 92 CPC conclusively deciding title to trust property operates as res judicata, barring subsequent suits by interested parties, and dismissed the appeal challenging this principle.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant res judicata representative suit Section 92 CPC Wakf property

Miscellaneous Application No. 665 of 2021 in SMW(C) No. 3 of 2020

23 Sep 2021 · N. V. Ramana; L. Nageswara Rao; Surya Kant · 2021 INSC 536

The Supreme Court extended the exclusion of limitation periods from 15.03.2020 to 02.10.2021 due to COVID-19, granting litigants additional time to file proceedings and directing amendments to containment zone guidelines for legal access.

civil other Significant COVID-19 pandemic extension of limitation period of limitation Article 141 Constitution of India

Miscellaneous Application No. 665 of 2021 in SMW(C) No. 3 of 2020

23 Sep 2021 · N. V. Ramana; L. Nageswara Rao; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court extended and excluded the period of limitation from 15.03.2020 to 02.10.2021 for all judicial proceedings due to COVID-19, granting a 90-day limitation period thereafter, and directed amendments to containment zone guidelines to facilitate legal processes.

civil other Significant COVID-19 pandemic extension of limitation period of limitation Article 141 Constitution of India

Triyambak S. Hegde v. Sripad

23 Sep 2021 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court reinstated the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by holding that the presumption arising from admitted cheque signatures was not rebutted and modified the sentence to impose an enhanced fine with imprisonment as default.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 presumption Dishonoured cheque Rebuttal of presumption

Triyambak S. Hegde v. Sripad

23 Sep 2021 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court restored the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by holding that admitted signatures on a dishonoured cheque raise a presumption of debt discharge which the accused failed to rebut, while modifying the sentence to impose an enhanced fine.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 139 presumption of debt

Ajai Pal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

23 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna · 2021 INSC 531

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquired in 1976 under the Land Acquisition Act should be Rs.28.12 paisa per square yard, rejecting claims for higher rates based on later acquisitions and emphasizing the principle of temporal and factual comparability.

property appeal_partly_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act compensation enhancement parity principle reference under Section 18

Ajai Pal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

23 Sep 2021 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compensation for lands acquired in 1976 cannot be enhanced to Rs.297 per square yard based on later acquisitions and fixed it at Rs.28.12 paisa per square yard with statutory benefits, partly allowing the appeals.

property appeal_partly_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act compensation enhancement Section 4 notification Section 18 reference

Sri Dorairaj Spintex v. R Chittibabu

22 Sep 2021 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Vikram Nath; B V Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that dismissal of workmen for misconduct not connected with an industrial dispute pending conciliation requires approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, not prior approval under Section 33(1)(b), and allowed the employer's appeal accordingly.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(1)(b) Section 33(2)(b) prior approval

Sri Marthanda Varma Th. Lrs. & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

22 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi · 2021 INSC 525

The Supreme Court held that the special audit of Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple includes the Temple Trust and directed completion of the audit, rejecting the Trust's plea for exclusion.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust special audit Amicus Curiae report

Sri Marthanda Varma Th. Lrs. & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

22 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the direction for a special audit of the Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple and its allied trusts, including SPSTT, rejecting the Trust's claim of independence and ordering audit completion within three months.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust special audit Amicus Curiae report

Union of India through Narcotics Control Bureau v. Md. Nawaz Khan

22 Sep 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; B V Nagarathna
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a commercial quantity narcotics case, emphasizing the stringent test under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the need for trial to determine possession and procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 bail commercial quantity narcotics conscious possession

Indrapal Singh and Others v. State of U.P.

21 Sep 2021 · B.V. Nagarathna; L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai · 2021 INSC 513

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of accused for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, affirming that consistent eyewitness testimony and proof of common intention suffice to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention eyewitness testimony