Supreme Court of India

16,357 judgments

Year:

Bharath Booshan Aggarwal v. State of Kerala

06 Oct 2021 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that sandalwood oil is forest produce but acquittal was warranted as prosecution failed to prove the appellant's knowledge of illicit possession under Section 27 of the Kerala Forest Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Forest Act forest produce sandalwood oil Section 27

BHARATH BOOSHAN AGGARWAL v. STATE OF KERALA

06 Oct 2021 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that possession of sandalwood oil is forest produce under the Kerala Forest Act, but conviction under Section 27 requires proof of knowledge of illicit origin beyond reasonable doubt, and acquitted the appellant for lack of such proof.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Forest Act forest produce sandalwood oil Section 27

Shrachi Burdwan Developers Private Limited v. State of West Bengal

05 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable to challenge Reference Court awards under the Land Acquisition Act by parties without locus, and the proper remedy is appeal under Section 54 with leave.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 3(b) person interested Article 226 maintainability Reference Court award

Shrachi Burdwan Developers Private Limited v. The State of West Bengal

05 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable to challenge a Land Acquisition Reference Court award, and the proper remedy is an appeal under Section 54, dismissing Shrachi Burdwan's appeal and restoring execution proceedings for landowners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 3(b) person interested Article 226 Constitution of India Reference Court award

M/S PREM COTTEX v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

05 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that short assessment notices for billing errors do not constitute deficiency in service and are recoverable despite the two-year limitation under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, dismissing the consumer complaint.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 56 short assessment deficiency in service

M/S PREM COTTEX v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

05 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that a short assessment demand due to billing mistakes does not constitute deficiency in service and upheld the licensee's right to recover amounts within the statutory limitation period under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 56 Consumer Protection Act 1986 deficiency in service

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors v. Premlata

05 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment must be to a post equivalent to that held by the deceased employee and cannot be granted to a higher post based solely on the dependent's qualifications, quashing the High Court's contrary order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment Dying-In-Harness Rules 1974 suitable post Class-III post

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Premlata

05 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment must be to a post equivalent to that held by the deceased employee and cannot be claimed based solely on the dependent's higher qualifications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment Dying-In-Harness Rules 1974 suitable post educational qualification

SHAIKH ANSAR AHMAD MD. HUSAIN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

05 Oct 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; S. RAVINDRA BHAT · 2021 INSC 614
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's directions in a public interest litigation concerning irregularities in a housing scheme, dismissing appeals against FIR registration despite procedural grievances and alleged political motives.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Public Interest Litigation Integrated Housing and Slum Development Programme FIR registration Natural justice

Shaikh Ansar Ahmad Md. Husain v. State of Maharashtra

05 Oct 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's directions in a public interest litigation concerning housing scheme irregularities, affirming mandatory FIR registration upon disclosure of cognizable offences despite appellants not being parties or heard in the PILs.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Public Interest Litigation Integrated Housing and Slum Development Programme FIR registration Cognizable offence

Dipali Biswas v. Nirmalendu Mukherjee

05 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that objections under Order XXI, Rule 64 regarding sale of entire property must be raised timely and cannot be entertained after multiple adjudications and finality of sale in execution proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 64 Section 47 CPC execution proceedings auction sale

Dipali Biswas v. Nirmalendu Mukherjee

05 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that objections under Order XXI, Rule 64 regarding partial sale cannot be raised belatedly after finality of auction sale and are barred by res judicata in execution proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 64 Section 47 CPC execution proceedings auction sale

PRABHAGIYA VAN ADHIKARI AWADH VAN PRABHAG v. ARUN KUMAR BHARDWAJ (DEAD) THR. LRS.

05 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that statutory notifications under the Forest Act and Zamindari Abolition Act vested disputed land in the State, invalidating leases granted by local authorities and entries in revenue records.

property appeal_allowed Significant Indian Forest Act, 1927 U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 reserved forest Section 4 notification

Deepa Mohan Naik v. Chandra Bhusan Pal

04 Oct 2021 · S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial case from Bihar to Goa and directed the parties to attempt mediation before further proceedings.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition matrimonial proceedings mediation amicable settlement

Mohd. Raza & Anr v. Geeta @ Geeta Devi

04 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna · 2021 INSC 609

The Supreme Court upheld a decree of eviction passed on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that ownership claims based solely on an agreement to sell without a decree or sale deed do not affect the plaintiff's ownership in eviction proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admission ownership agreement to sell

Mohd. Raza & Anr v. Geeta @ Geeta Devi

04 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, confirming plaintiff's ownership and tenant status of defendant No.1, subject to the outcome of a pending suit for specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admission ownership tenant

Shakun Srivastava v. Prem Prakash Srivastava

04 Oct 2021 · S. Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 607

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition to shift matrimonial proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Gorakhpur to Bhopal for convenience and expeditious disposal.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 Section 9 Family Court

Shakun Srivastava v. Prem Prakash Srivastava

04 Oct 2021 · S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court, Gorakhpur to the Family Court, Bhopal for convenience and expeditious disposal.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act family court jurisdiction

Parul Jaiswal v. Avinash Jaiswal & Anr.

04 Oct 2021 · S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court refused to transfer a divorce petition from Bengaluru to Allahabad, directing mediation and continuation of proceedings with safeguards for party convenience and compensation.

family petition_dismissed Significant transfer petition divorce petition Family Court mediation

Swati Chaudhary v. Nitesh Kumar

04 Oct 2021 · S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court dismissed the Transfer Petition and Special Leave Petition as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Transfer Petition Special Leave Petition withdrawal settlement