Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

N.C.C.F. EMPLOYEES UNION v. UNION OF INDIA

07 Jan 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of writ petitions concerning NCCF's status as 'State' under Article 12, granting liberty to file appropriate proceedings, thereby upholding the Patna High Court's view accepted by NCCF through appeal withdrawal.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India State definition writ jurisdiction National Co-operative Consumer Federation of India Limited

The State of Maharashtra v. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal & Ors.

07 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that charitable educational institutions registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act and Societies Registration Act are not exempt from electricity duty under the Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016, reversing the High Court's exemption order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant electricity duty Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016 charitable educational institutions exemption

The State of Maharashtra v. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal & Ors

07 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that charitable educational institutions registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act are not exempt from electricity duty under the Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016, overruling the High Court's exemption order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant electricity duty Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016 exemption charitable educational institutions

DKG Buildcon Private Ltd. v. The Adjudicating & Enquiry Officer

07 Jan 2022 · B.V. Nagarathna; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's imposition of a Rs. 1 crore penalty on companies for willful non-compliance with summons during investigation of securities market manipulation, applying amended provisions of the SEBI Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Act 1992 Section 15A(a) Section 11C(3) Section 15J

UMA PRIYADARSHINI S. v. SUCHITH K NAIR

06 Jan 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reduction of maintenance, directing fresh adjudication by the family court with interim payments to the appellant and her minor son.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance interim maintenance family court income disclosure

Union of India v. Alapan Bandyopadhyay

06 Jan 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that only the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the Tribunal Bench passing a transfer order under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act sits has jurisdiction to judicially review that order, setting aside the Calcutta High Court's order for lack of jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 25 transfer Central Administrative Tribunal territorial jurisdiction

UMA PRIYADARSHINI S. v. SUCHITH K NAIR

06 Jan 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reduction of maintenance and directed fresh adjudication considering all relevant factors, including COVID-19's impact on income, while ordering interim payments for the child's expenses.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance minor child maintenance application family court

Union of India v. Alapan Bandyopadhyay

06 Jan 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that only the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the Tribunal Bench passing a transfer order under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act sits has jurisdiction to judicially review such transfer orders, setting aside the Calcutta High Court's order for lack of jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 25 transfer Central Administrative Tribunal territorial jurisdiction

LAWYERS VOICE v. STATE OF PUNJAB

06 Jan 2022 · N.V. RAMANA; SURYA KANT; HIMA KOHLI

The Supreme Court ordered an independent judicial inquiry into the serious security breach during the Prime Minister's 2022 Punjab visit, emphasizing accountability and preventive safeguards.

constitutional other Significant Prime Minister security breach Special Protection Group Act 1988 independent enquiry judicial intervention

Lawyers Voice v. State of Punjab & Others

06 Jan 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court constituted an independent judicial enquiry into a serious security breach during the Prime Minister's Punjab visit, directing preservation of records and staying ongoing investigations.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant security breach Prime Minister security Special Protection Group Act 1988 independent enquiry

State of UP v. M/S McDowell and Company Limited

05 Jan 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari; Krishna Murari · 2022 INSC 13
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that excise duty on liquor destroyed by fire is payable only if negligence is proved; absent negligence, the demand is unlawful and the incident is an act of God.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant excise duty fire incident act of God negligence

Shri Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar Singh v. The Manipur University

05 Jan 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the amended reservation norms for Manipur University under the 2012 Amendment Act, mandating reservation percentages of 2% for SC, 31% for ST, and 17% for OBC candidates, dismissing the appellants' challenge to restore higher SC reservation.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Reservation in Admission Central Educational Institutions Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes

Bhadar Ram v. Jassa Ram

05 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that Scheduled Caste status is State-specific and a Punjab Scheduled Caste person cannot claim such status in Rajasthan for land purchase, rendering the sale deed void under Rajasthan tenancy and colonization laws.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Caste status Rajasthan Tenancy Act Section 42 Rajasthan Colonization Act Section 13 compounding under Section 13A

Bhadar Ram v. Jassa Ram

05 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld that Scheduled Caste status and related protections under Rajasthan law do not extend to a Scheduled Caste person residing in another State, rendering the land sale void under Sections 42 and 13 of the Rajasthan Tenancy and Colonization Acts.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Caste status Rajasthan Tenancy Act Section 42 Rajasthan Colonization Act Section 13 compounding under Section 13A

Devarajan Raman v. Bank of India Limited

05 Jan 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that adjudicating authorities must determine Resolution Professional fees based on reasoned consideration of bids and CoC approval, setting aside arbitrary fee fixation orders and remanding for fresh decision.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Resolution Professional fees Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 Section 60(5)(c) IBC Committee of Creditors approval

Shri Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar Singh v. Manipur University

05 Jan 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the amended reservation percentages for SC, ST, and OBC candidates in Manipur University as per the 2012 Amendment to the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, affirming that the provisos apply to all CEIs in the specified North Eastern region including Manipur.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Reservation in Admission Central Educational Institutions Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes

M/S. DURGA WELDING WORKS v. CHIEF ENGINEER, RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION

04 Jan 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the arbitration petition under Section 11(6) due to the appellant's failure to pursue it, affirming that only the High Court can appoint an arbitrator once such a petition is filed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator ex-parte award

Sandoz Private Limited v. Union of India & Others

04 Jan 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that EOUs procure goods duty-free under the FTP and are not entitled to TED refund, while DTA suppliers may claim refund subject to conditions, clarifying the effect of the DGFT policy circular and amendment notification.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Terminal Excise Duty Foreign Trade Policy Export Oriented Unit Deemed Exports

Shobhabai Narayan Shinde v. The Divisional Commissioner

04 Jan 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that no appeal lies before the Divisional Commissioner against the Collector's order rejecting disqualification under Section 14B(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and set aside the impugned orders allowing such appeals.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Section 14B(1) disqualification election expenses

Ellora Paper Mills Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

04 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 3 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that arbitrators who become ineligible under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration Act, 1996 lose their mandate by operation of law, requiring appointment of a fresh arbitrator, and set aside the High Court's order refusing such appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Seventh Schedule neutrality of arbitrators