Supreme Court of India
8,182 judgments
JAI BHAVANI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL v. RAMESH
The Supreme Court held that the President's mandatory membership in the Inquiry Committee under Rule 36(2)(b) applies only if the Head is also the Chief Executive Officer, and validated the disciplinary removal of the Principal despite the President's absence due to ill health.
JAI BHAVANI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL v. RAMESH
The Supreme Court held that the President's membership in the Inquiry Committee under Rule 36(2)(b) is required only if the Head is also the Chief Executive Officer, and validated the disciplinary removal of the Principal despite the President's replacement due to ill health.
The Municipal Committee, Barwala v. Jai Narayan and Company
The Supreme Court held that a highest bidder in a municipal land auction acquires no legal right without confirmation by the Deputy Commissioner and prior State Government approval, setting aside the decree for mandatory injunction and declaring the plaintiff's possession illegal.
The Municipal Committee, Barwala v. Jai Narayan and Company
The Supreme Court held that a highest bidder in a municipal land auction acquires no right without sale confirmation by competent authority, set aside the decree for mandatory injunction, and declared the plaintiff's possession illegal.
Tarlochan Singh @ Rana v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of Arms Act offences and conspiracy charges, holding that mere firearm license ownership does not establish guilt without proof of knowing delivery or willful contravention.
Tarlochan Singh @ Rana v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of Arms Act and conspiracy charges, holding that mere firearm license ownership does not imply liability without proof of knowing delivery or willful violation.
SVG FASHIONS PVT. LTD. v. RITU MURLI MANOHAR GOYAL
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act can extend limitation for insolvency claims and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
C. MANJAMMA & ANR. v. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
The Supreme Court restored the compensation awarded to the dependents of a deceased driver, holding that the Commissioner’s findings based on documentary evidence of death due to employment strain cannot be interfered with by the High Court absent perversity or substantial question of law.
C. Manjamma & Anr. v. The Divisional Manager
The Supreme Court restored the Commissioner’s award of compensation to the dependents of a deceased driver, holding that factual findings based on documentary evidence of employment-related death should not be disturbed by the High Court absent perversity or substantial question of law.
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION v. SRI LANKAPPAAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, reaffirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction in civil appeals.
Master Ayush v. The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor paraplegic road accident victim, directing a liberal and comprehensive award covering future earnings, medical expenses, attendant charges, and loss of amenities.
Bata India Limited v. Workmen of Bata India Limited and Another
The Supreme Court held that deliberate "go slow" by workmen justifies pro-rata wage deductions but mandates a fair hearing before such deductions, directing payment of deducted wages and allowing management to take lawful action.
Bata India Limited v. Workmen of Bata India Limited and Another
The Supreme Court held that wage deductions for "go slow" work are permissible only after giving workmen a fair hearing, directing payment of deducted wages and allowing management to take lawful action thereafter.
RAM KRISHNA GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition, holding no error apparent on record to justify interference.
RAM KRISHNA GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition, holding no error apparent on record to warrant interference.
Mekha Ram and Others v. State of Rajasthan and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to recover excess amounts paid to employees pursuant to an interim order later set aside, applying the principle of restitution and Section 144 CPC.
Mekha Ram and Others v. State of Rajasthan and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to recover excess amounts paid pursuant to an interim order later set aside, applying the principle of restitution under Section 144 CPC.
Master Ayush v. The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor paraplegic road accident victim, applying liberal principles for permanent disability and directing structured disbursement to the guardian.
Delhi Development Authority v. Rajan Sood
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken or compensation tendered, and interim stay periods exclude from lapse computation, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's lapse declaration.
Delhi Development Authority v. Rajan Sood
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken or compensation tendered, and excluded stay periods from the lapse computation, overruling Pune Municipal Corporation and allowing the appeal of Delhi Development Authority.