High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Sandeep Lahiri Choudhury v. Small Industries Development Bank of India

09 Feb 2026 · R.I. Chagla; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court upheld SIDBI's pension scheme cut-off date and denied retrospective pension arrears, applying the Supreme Court's M.T. Mani precedent and emphasizing financial sustainability and prior opportunity to opt for pension.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Pension Regulations Cut-off date Retrospective pension Provident Fund Scheme

Radhakrishna Sabaji Desai v. The State of Maharashtra

09 Feb 2026 · M.S. Karnik; S. M. Modak
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that stamp duty paid on a Redevelopment Rights Agreement is refundable upon cancellation under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, as such agreements are chargeable as conveyances despite not being formal Agreements for Sale.

civil petition_allowed Significant Redevelopment Rights Agreement Stamp Duty Refund Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Section 47(c)(5)

Shri Ashok Motiram Jadhav v. The Director Medical Education

09 Feb 2026 · M. S. Karnik; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held that an employee on an isolated post is entitled to Time Bound Promotion benefits without fulfilling educational qualifications for promotion, including the second TBP after 24 years, and directed pay fixation accordingly.

labor petition_allowed Significant Time Bound Promotion Assured Career Progression isolated post pay scale fixation

Akashdeep Karaj Singh v. State of Maharashtra

09 Feb 2026 · Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an accused under MCOCA, holding that mere phone call evidence without material linking the accused to the offence does not satisfy the stringent bail conditions under Section 21(4).

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail MCOCA organised crime syndicate reasonable grounds

Prakash Krishna Gamare v. Krishna Ganpat Gamre

09 Feb 2026 · Somasekhar Sundaresan

The Bombay High Court quashed an eviction order under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, holding that relief under the Act requires the senior citizen to prove inability to maintain himself, a jurisdictional fact absent in this case.

family appeal_allowed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Section 4 jurisdictional fact maintenance entitlement eviction under Section 23

Mahavir Civil Engineering And Services Pvt. Ltd. v. The Jalgaon Peoples Co-Operative Bank Ltd & Ors.

06 Feb 2026 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of 2019 agreements assigning project work during company liquidation under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, exercising its discretion to validate bona fide transactions in the company's interest.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 536(2) Companies Act 1956 winding up validation of transactions joint venture

Shaun Stany Noronha v. Union of India

06 Feb 2026 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that the arrest under the Customs Act was unlawful due to lack of requisite material at the time of arrest, quashed the non-bailable classification, and granted bail to the petitioners.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 104 arrest Section 135 offences non-bailable offence

Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. v. MPPL Enterprises Pvt Ltd & Ors.

05 Feb 2026 · ARIF S. DOCTOR

The Bombay High Court held that a plaint lacking specific allegations against nominee directors fails to disclose a cause of action against them and allowed rejection of the plaint as against such defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action nominee director separate corporate personality

Ashok Shankar Mhatre v. The State of Maharashtra

05 Feb 2026 · Manish Pitale; Shreeram V. Shirsat

The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra judicial confession last seen together motive

Siddharth Goel v. The Sub-Registrar Class II

05 Feb 2026 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court held that the Registration Authority cannot refuse registration of sale deeds on grounds extraneous to the Registration Act, 1908, including non-compliance with the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation Act or Red Zone restrictions, and quashed the refusal orders.

property appeal_allowed Significant Registration Act, 1908 Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Rule 44(1)(i) Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 Red Zone

Union of India v. M/s. Bridge Track And Tower Pvt. Ltd.

04 Feb 2026 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award directing payment to the contractor, holding that a lien cannot be maintained on amounts payable without raising a claim and invoking arbitration, and that pending criminal proceedings do not justify withholding payment under contract terms.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Lien Indian Railways Standard Conditions of Contract

Integro Finserv Private Limited v. Santoshkumar Ramsajeevan Dewivedi

04 Feb 2026 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court directed issuance and proper forwarding of fresh non-bailable warrants for execution outside its jurisdiction under BNSS 2023 provisions to ensure timely disposal of long-pending Execution Applications.

civil other Significant Execution Application Non-Bailable Warrant Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 Warrant execution outside jurisdiction

Anuradha Nayan Shah v. Jayantilal Vallabhdas Patni & Ors.

04 Feb 2026 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court quashed a rigged Court Auction due to syndicate formation and underbidding, forfeiting bidders' earnest money and ordering a fresh valuation and auction.

civil other Significant Court Auction Syndicate formation Underbidding Forfeiture of earnest money deposit

Meena A. Rizvi v. The State of Maharashtra

04 Feb 2026 · Kamal Khata
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Revenue authorities cannot delete mutation entries based on a registered civil Court Consent Decree by adjudicating title, and such mutation must be restored for fiscal purposes.

property appeal_allowed Significant mutation proceedings Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 registered Consent Decree title adjudication

M/s. Sunshine Builders and Developers v. HDFC Bank Limited & Ors.

04 Feb 2026 · R.I. Chagla; Farhan P. Dubash

The Bombay High Court held that a mortgagor falls within the definition of 'borrower' under the SARFAESI Act and must comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 18(1) for appeals against any order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, including procedural orders.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 18(1) pre-deposit borrower definition

Raju Raghu Sadavarte v. The State of Maharashtra

04 Feb 2026 · Sarang V. Kotwal; Sandesh D. Patil

The High Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt, including unreliable confession and inconclusive recovery of the murder weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder extra judicial confession recovery of weapon

Central Bank of India v. Rohini Ramesh Kalyankar & Ors.

04 Feb 2026 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction to try suits for rescission and declarations against banks despite the RDB Act and SARFAESI Act, and a plaint cannot be rejected in part under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant jurisdiction of civil court Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Jitendra Jaywant Sawant; Yakub Ismail Shaikh; Yusuf Ismail Shaikh v. The Deputy Collector; State of Maharashtra

03 Feb 2026 · A.S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging removal of unauthorized constructions on State land, affirming strict adherence to building regulations and denying protection to illegal structures without lawful sanction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction illegal encroachment public notice removal of illegal structures

Namrata Ramchandra Zagade v. Shri. Gujrati Shikshan Pracharak Mandal, Pune & Ors.

03 Feb 2026 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court held that termination of a teacher without due process under the MEPS Act is illegal and ordered her reinstatement with full backwages, rejecting compensation in lieu of reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination reinstatement backwages Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

Sunil Narayan Patil v. Pundalik Balaji Gharat

03 Feb 2026 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and granted interim injunction for specific performance of agreements concerning land rights despite the trial court's rejection, holding that substantial payments and prima facie evidence established enforceable rights against subsequent purchasers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance temporary injunction agreement for sale memorandum of understanding