High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

M/s. T. Bhimjyani Realty Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Vineet Sachdeva & Anr.

25 Oct 2024 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that RERA authorities have jurisdiction to examine fraud allegations in real estate disputes but must balance this with the summary nature of proceedings and the protection of allottee rights, remanding the matter for detailed inquiry.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Real Estate Regulatory Authority RERA fraud jurisdiction allottee rights

M/s. Rashmi Realty Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Rahul Rajendrakumar Pagariya & Ors.

25 Oct 2024 · Madhav J. Jamdar, J.

The Bombay High Court held that disputes under RERA are non-arbitrable despite arbitration clauses, affirming the Authority's jurisdiction to order refund with interest to homebuyers.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Real Estate Regulatory Authority RERA arbitration clause non-arbitrability

Kausa Jama Masjid Trust v. Fashibai Bhagirath Bhagat & Ors.

25 Oct 2024 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court held that a suit for easementary right of way over Waqf property without dispute over Waqf rights is maintainable in Civil Court, and dismissed the suit for lack of cause of action and jurisdictional bar.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Waqf property easementary right of way jurisdiction Waqf Tribunal

Mrs. Dagdabai Vitthal Kadam v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Oct 2024 · G. S. Kulkarni; Somasekhar Sundaresan

The Bombay High Court held that a successor inheriting property after the appointed date under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, is entitled to separate rehabilitation benefits and directed allotment of alternate land to the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 20 Wildlife Act land acquisition inheritance rights

Roshanbi Aziz Motiwala v. Union of India

25 Oct 2024 · G. S. Kulkarni; Somasekhar Sundaresan

The Court held that the rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the 2013 Act apply to land acquisition under the National Highways Act and directed fresh reasoned adjudication of petitioners' claims beyond mere mechanical reliance on non-statutory guidelines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 National Highways Act, 1956 land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement

Shri Balaso Bhimgonda Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Oct 2024 · S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held that an unregistered partition deed of joint Hindu family property does not require compulsory registration and set aside the trial court's order impounding the deed and the Collector's demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty.

civil petition_allowed Significant partition deed registration stamp duty impounding

Ratna Chandrakant Vannam v. Tukaram K. Jadhav

24 Oct 2024 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held the arrest under Maharashtra Police Act unlawful, quashed the case, and awarded compensation for illegal detention and police misconduct.

criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal arrest Maharashtra Police Act Section 33(T) Section 131

Huges Real Estate Developers LLP v. Khernagar Adarsh Co-operative Housing Society Limited

24 Oct 2024 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J

The Bombay High Court dismissed the developer's appeal for injunction restraining redevelopment, held no concluded contract on revised terms, set aside NOC condition for new developer, and directed monetary deposit to protect developer's rights while allowing redevelopment to proceed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Development Agreement temporary injunction redevelopment housing society

IMAX Corporation v. E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Limited & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a final limitation order attained after Supreme Court dismissal of appeals operates as res judicata, allowing enforcement of foreign arbitral awards against E-City but not related companies, and clarified public policy and impleadment principles under the Arbitration Act.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement limitation period res judicata Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Suruchi Rajendra Gurjar v. Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Authority & Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court quashed the stigmatic termination of a probationary Chief Law Officer by Mumbai Port Trust for suppression of material facts without proper departmental enquiry, ordering reinstatement with back wages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant probation extension stigmatic termination departmental enquiry suppression of material facts

Chandrashekhar Vaman Patwardhan v. The State of Maharashtra

23 Oct 2024 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the attachment of a flat under the MPID Act, holding that attachment proceedings cannot continue against property of a deceased director without statutory provision and the property was not acquired from depositors' money.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant MPID Act attachment of property deceased accused legal heirs liability

Trident Estate Private Limited v. The Office of Joint District

23 Oct 2024 · B. P. Colabawalla; Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

The Bombay High Court held that in court-monitored auctions, the sale price fixed by the Court is the true market value for stamp duty, and Stamp Authorities cannot independently reassess or levy additional duty based on higher valuations.

property petition_allowed Significant court-monitored auction stamp duty market value Sale-cum-Monitoring Committee

Dinesh Manik Suryavanshi v. The Education Officer

23 Oct 2024 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; M.M. Sathaye

Termination of a Shikshan Sevak’s services based on a pending criminal case is unlawful if acquittal occurs before termination, entitling reinstatement with partial back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination of service acquittal criminal case pendency back wages

Andreas Stihl Private Limited v. The Joint Commissioner of State Tax

23 Oct 2024 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that authorities under the Settlement Act cannot invoke Section 50 of the MVAT Act to adjust refunds against demands of other years without a separate order under the MVAT Act, quashing review orders that unlawfully did so.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Act MVAT Act Section 50 MVAT Section 15 Settlement Act

Air India Charters Ltd v. Ms. Tanja Glusica

23 Oct 2024 · Sharmila U. Deshmukh

The Bombay High Court held that compensation to dependents of a contractor-employed pilot must be calculated based on the actual salary paid by the contractor, with interest payable for delayed payment but no penalty on the principal employer.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 12 liability principal employer contractor employee compensation

Dinesh Manik Suryavanshi v. The Education Officer

23 Oct 2024 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; M.M. Sathaye

Termination of an employee based on pendency of a criminal case is illegal after acquittal, entitling reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant termination of service acquittal criminal case pendency back wages

Rohit Uttam Mane v. State of Maharashtra

22 Oct 2024 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court allowed writ petitions directing issuance of 'Koli Mahadev' Scheduled Tribe Certificates to petitioners based on familial lineage and subject to statutory verification.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe Certificate Koli Mahadev Tribe Scrutiny Committee Maharashtra Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Act 2000

The State of Maharashtra v. Prakash Pandharinath Rajput

22 Oct 2024 · S. M. Modak

The High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of a Police Sub-Inspector accused of corruption, holding that the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe despite valid sanction for prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant demand and acceptance illegal gratification Prevention of Corruption Act sanction for prosecution

FCA India Automobiles Private Limited v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Oct 2024 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that a delayed deposit of 50% of the assessed amount under Section 127(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not bar entertaining an appeal filed within the 30-day limitation period, and restored the appeal for hearing on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 126 assessment Section 127 appeal deposit requirement

Pranav Constructions Limited v. Priyadarshini Co-operative Housing Society Limited

22 Oct 2024 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J

The Bombay High Court held that individual members of a Co-operative Society are bound by the Society's Development Agreement and granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act directing non-cooperative members to vacate premises for redevelopment despite disputes over entitlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Co-operative Society members Development Agreement