High Court of Bombay

4,240 judgments

Year:

Ramakant Meghnath Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

06 Jan 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S.M. Modak

The High Court acquitted accused in a murder case due to inconclusive medical evidence and failure of prosecution to prove cruelty and homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder suicide strangulation Section 302 IPC

Jai Maharashtra Shikshak Wa Karmachari Sena v. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation

03 Jan 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court upheld that pension benefits under the BMC Pension Scheme must be granted to teachers and non-teaching staff of private aided schools including service before grant-in-aid, reaffirming binding precedent despite pending appeals.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Pension Scheme Private Primary Aided Schools Qualifying Service Grant-in-aid

Amey Sanjay Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra

03 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the applicant in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity of charas due to procedural lapses, discrepancies in seizure, and prolonged pre-trial incarceration violating Article 21 rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail commercial quantity Section 37 NDPS Act

Vaibhavi Rajendra Chalke v. Rajendra Ganpat Chalke

03 Jan 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The High Court upheld the Family Court's decree of divorce on the ground that filing a false criminal prosecution by a spouse constitutes mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty false prosecution Section 498A IPC mental cruelty

Charushila Bira Shriram v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Jan 2025 · Sharmila U. Deshmukh

The Bombay High Court held that the two-year immunity against No Confidence Motion under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is computed from the date of first election to the post of Sarpanch, not from the date of election of a subsequent Sarpanch filling a vacancy.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Section 35(3) Section 43 Sarpanch

Siddhant @ Siddharth Sachin Dhanedar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to contradictory grounds and unexplained date discrepancies, emphasizing the necessity of clear and consistent grounds for detention and the detenu's right to effective representation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 grounds of detention subjective satisfaction

Pranav Rohit Patel v. Rohit Jayramdas Patel

02 Jan 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court refused to remove the Executor despite allegations of adverse title and misconduct, holding that removal requires strong grounds and title disputes fall outside Testamentary Court jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Executor removal Indian Succession Act Section 301 Probate Testamentary Court jurisdiction

Sangram Sampatrao Deshmukh v. The Election Commissioner of India and Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court dismissed an election petition challenging the election of a candidate for failure to plead material facts demonstrating how alleged electoral irregularities materially affected the election result, and held that only statutory parties can be impleaded in election petitions.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Election Petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 100(1)(d)(iii) Section 100(1)(d)(iv)

Everard Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra

02 Jan 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed slum dwellers' petition protecting illegal structures, held BMC liable for contempt for non-compliance of demolition orders, and directed immediate removal of encroachments on land acquired for a DP road.

property appeal_dismissed Significant illegal hutments demolition Municipal Corporation contempt of court

The Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Jayantilal P. Shah and Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed the Claimants' Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing the market value of acquired land to Rs.26,000 per square meter based on comparable sale instances and rejected the Acquiring Body's claim to deduct post-acquisition construction costs.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value Comparable Sales Method Section 18 Reference

Sudam Sitaram Dagade & Ors. v. Uttamrao Sitaram Dagade

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing an afterthought application to recast issues after plaintiff's evidence was closed, holding such amendment impermissible and directing expeditious disposal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant framing of issues Order XIV Rule 5 CPC Will validity Indian Succession Act

Dr. Sakharam Dinkar Patwardhan v. Shri Shankar Kondo Kalekar

02 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court upheld a partial eviction decree allowing a co-owner landlord's bonafide requirement for possession, dismissing the writ petition challenging the appellate court's order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bonafide requirement co-owner eviction suit landlord's right partition of property

Saurabhkumar S. Patel v. Baburay Pundalik Salunke

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court upheld the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, extending it to subsequent purchasers of the corporate debtor's property, thereby sustaining the stay on suit proceedings against them.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 14 moratorium Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Specific performance

T.A.N. Moorthy v. C.K. Narayan and Anr

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt at the time of cheque issuance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 Section 139 Appeal against acquittal

The State of Maharashtra v. Shivaji Jaisingrao Patil

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the acquittal of a public servant in a bribery case due to invalid sanction and serious doubts in prosecution evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proper application of mind in sanction orders.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Sanction Order Application of mind Bribery

Vasantrao Sampatrao Nalavade v. District Collector, Satara & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court upheld the District Court's order setting aside injunction restraining defendants' use of a disputed road, holding that plaintiffs failed to establish prima facie ownership over the road which is prima facie a public road maintained by Gram Panchayat.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant injunction vahivat road public road private road

Kisan Soma Sathe v. The State of Maharashtra

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed the discharge application of an accused, holding that confessional statements of co-accused recorded before police without Magistrate's presence are inadmissible and insufficient without corroborative evidence to frame charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confessional statement co-accused discharge application Indian Evidence Act

Presenjeet Manabendra Sen v. The State of Maharashtra

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court set aside the applicant's conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death due to failure of prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rash and negligent driving Section 279 IPC Section 304-A IPC hired vehicle

Smita Pansare & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

02 Jan 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held that judicial monitoring of investigation ends once the charge-sheet is filed and directed expeditious trial in the murder case of Govindrao Pansare, dismissing the petition for continued oversight.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant monitoring of investigation Article 226 charge-sheet Special Investigation Team

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Ors. v. Kunal Vikram Sawant and Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of the application to dismiss the suit plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint discloses triable issues and a prima facie cause of action for cancellation of a registered Sale Deed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Agreement for Sale Sale Deed Injunction order