High Court of Bombay

4,154 judgments

Year:

HLV Limited v. Airports Authority of India

09 Jun 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

The Bombay High Court held that eviction disputes under lease deeds deemed as public premises are excluded from arbitration by contract, dismissing Leela's appeals and upholding eviction proceedings by AAI.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement eviction public premises lease deed

Smt. Shashikala Sriram Shetty v. Jagannath Honnaya Shetty & Ors.

09 Jun 2025 · N.J. Jamadar
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that amendment of written statement after trial commencement requires due diligence and quashed the trial court's order allowing amendment without such diligence.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence jurisdictional error

Harish Arora; Venetia Palia; Phiroze Karmali; Khalid Omar Wakani; Nafees Khan; Vinay Wadhera v. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies; Devdas A. Aroskar; Aarti Gupta; Sneha Rajani; Uday Shetty; Bennie Philips; Parmvir S. Parmar; Bobbie Phillips; B

09 Jun 2025 · Amit Borkar, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that disqualification of cooperative society managing committee members for non-compliance with redevelopment guidelines is unsustainable as the guidelines are directory, and orders passed without natural justice and ignoring binding precedents are liable to be quashed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Section 79A disqualification Government Resolution 4th July 2019

Jindal Poly Films Ltd. v. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation

09 Jun 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that appeals under Section 406 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 are appellate proceedings governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and rejected the petitioner's application for additional evidence for failing to meet procedural conditions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 406 Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act Order 41 Rule 27 CPC additional evidence appeal procedure

Sandhya Shekhar Zanjare v. Shekhar Suresh Zanjare

09 Jun 2025 · Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court quashed the Family Court's order allowing amendment of divorce petition after trial commencement due to lack of due diligence and fundamental change in suit nature.

family petition_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence commencement of trial

Ramanlal Hiralal Taak v. The Government of India & Anr.

09 Jun 2025 · Somasekhar Sundaresan
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that statutory solatium under the Land Acquisition Act is payable for National Highways land acquisitions post-1997 but cannot be added by modifying arbitral awards under Sections 34 or 37 of the Arbitration Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 jurisdiction Section 37 appeal Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Sandeep Bhausaheb Shelar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

09 Jun 2025 · Amit Borkar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a quasi judicial authority must first adjudicate an earlier application by flat purchasers for cooperative society registration before entertaining a developer’s subsequent proposal, quashing orders that favored the developer without such adjudication.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Section 10(1) cooperative society registration quasi judicial authority

Taluka and District-Ratnagiri v. Ravindra Tukaram Ambre

06 Jun 2025 · Ashwin D. Bhobe

The High Court upheld the execution order construing an ambiguous decree to ensure effective removal of obstructions and access rights, dismissing the writ petition challenging the execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant execution of decree construction of decree right of way ambiguity in decree

Hemang Jadavji Shah v. The State of Maharashtra

30 May 2025 · Gauri Godse; Somasekhar Sundaresan
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court held the petitioner’s arrest illegal for failure to produce him before the magistrate within 24 hours and non-compliance with procedural safeguards, ordering his immediate release.

criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal arrest production before magistrate 24-hour rule Article 22(2) Constitution

Andheri P.M.G.P. Colony Co-op. Hsg. Societies Association Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

30 May 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court upheld the State Government's waiver of consent requirements for MHADA-led redevelopment of dilapidated buildings, dismissing the petition challenging the process and affirming MHADA's right to proceed without unanimous society consent.

property petition_dismissed Significant MHADA redevelopment co-operative housing societies consent waiver

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation v. Union Bank of India

26 May 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a mortgage executed without lessor's consent as a breach of lease, limited subletting charges to a defined period, and dismissed MIDC's writ petition challenging the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal's order.

property petition_dismissed Significant lease deed mortgage subletting charges breach of covenant

Mahendarsingh Digvijaysingh Mukne v. The State of Maharashtra

26 May 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 4(1)(a)(i) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Rules, 1975, restricting transfer of tribal land to non-tribals for agricultural purposes, dismissing the petition challenging it under Article 14.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 14 Scheduled Tribes Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Section 36A

Jagruk Nagrik Sanghatana v. The State of Maharashtra

21 May 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J

The Bombay High Court dismissed the PIL seeking removal of telecommunication towers on health hazard and illegality grounds, holding that scientific evidence does not support health risk claims and that the Telecommunications Act, 2023 governs tower installation without requiring local development permissions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant telecommunication towers electromagnetic radiation health hazards Article 21

Subhash Kisan More v. Abhayankar Jagannath Motiram

09 May 2025 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court held that challenges to the inclusion of ineligible voters in the electoral roll can be entertained in an election petition if material particulars are pleaded and the irregularities materially affect the election result, and thus refused to reject the petition at the threshold.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant election petition electoral roll ineligible voters Teachers Constituency

Aryan World School v. Pune Metropolitan Regional Development Authority & Ors.

09 May 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging demolition of unauthorized construction, holding that Gram Panchayat's NOC is invalid post-PMRDA establishment and illegal constructions cannot be regularized.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant illegal construction No Objection Certificate Gram Panchayat authority PMRDA

Mohammad Shafique Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh v. The Chairman, Mumbai Port Trust

09 May 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that an employee removed for unauthorized absenteeism but not for misconduct involving moral turpitude is entitled to compassionate pension if deserving of special consideration under applicable pension regulations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate pension unauthorized absenteeism removal from service Mumbai Port Trust Pension Regulations

Rizvi Education Society v. The Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation

09 May 2025 · Sharmila U. Deshmukh

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the amalgamation of two public trusts under Section 50A(2) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, holding that objections by an adverse party relating to pending litigation are not germane and procedural lapses did not vitiate the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Amalgamation of trusts Section 50A Maharashtra Public Trusts Act Charity Commissioner powers Public Trusts Act

Vikas Chandrakant Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

09 May 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused held for over six years without trial, reaffirming that prolonged pre-trial detention violates the fundamental right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail long incarceration right to speedy trial Article 21

Vahbiz Pervez Dumasia & Niloufer Pervez Dumasia v. Mr. Jahangir Jeejeebhoy

08 May 2025 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that it has jurisdiction under Clause XVII of the Letters Patent to appoint guardians for mentally ill adults and appointed the petitioners as guardians and managers of their incapacitated father's person and estate.

civil petition_allowed Significant Guardianship Clause XVII Letters Patent Mental illness Parens patriae jurisdiction

Viacom 18 Media Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

08 May 2025 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court remanded appeals concerning withholding tax liability on payments for satellite transponder services to Intelsat Corporation, directing lower authorities to determine the nature of services and applicability of 'royalty' under domestic law and the India-USA DTAA before adjudicating tax liability.

tax remanded Significant royalty withholding tax Section 195 Section 9(1)(vi)