High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Aakash Packaging v. Arenel (Private) Limited

08 Sep 2025 · R.I. Chagla

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award for rejecting admitted contemporaneous evidence and relying on hearsay, holding it conflicted with public policy and shocked the conscience of the Court.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Public Policy of India Hearsay Evidence

Mahadeo Sitaram Navale; Chaturabai Mahadeo Navale v. Baputao Ramchandra Navale & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Gauri Godse J.

The High Court allowed the second appeal, setting aside the decree for specific performance of an ancestral property sale agreement held to be a security for loans, and upheld the trial court's dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance Section 20 Specific Relief Act Section 52 Transfer of Property Act ancestral property

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation v. Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Karyalayeen Karmachari Sanghatana

05 Sep 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's interim order restraining the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation from discontinuing long-standing additional increments for LSG and LGS diploma holders without statutory notice under Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 9-A Industrial Disputes Act customary concession additional increments Local Self Government Diploma

Jayant Meghani & Ors. v. M/s Shree Tirupati Greenfield & Ors.

04 Sep 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that disputed investments were loans secured by flats, validated evidence led by a power of attorney holder, and affirmed the interest rates awarded, dismissing all challenges under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Contract interpretation Power of attorney witness

Milind Satish Sawant v. The State of Maharashtra

04 Sep 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court held that a Designated Court under the MPID Act has jurisdiction to try connected IPC offences and rejected bail for the accused in a large-scale financial fraud case involving criminal breach of trust and cheating.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant MPID Act jurisdiction Designated Court powers Criminal breach of trust Section 409 IPC Criminal conspiracy Section 120-B IPC

Mohan Madhav Chaurasiya v. The State of Maharashtra

04 Sep 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the life convictions of two accused for murder based on circumstantial evidence, affirming that absence of motive does not preclude conviction if the chain of incriminating circumstances is complete.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together theory motive absence Section 302 IPC

Pravin Nathalal Parghi v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

04 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition directing custody of a minor twin to the biological father, affirming that illegal detention by a non-guardian justifies writ relief despite pending custody proceedings.

family appeal_allowed Significant habeas corpus child custody natural guardian Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Shivranjan Towers Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit v. Bhujbal Constructions

04 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that a cooperative society formed by flat purchasers is bound by arbitration clauses in their individual agreements and that challenges to arbitrator jurisdiction under Section 16 are not maintainable by writ petition absent patent lack of jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction challenge Cooperative society Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960

High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Nilesh C. Ojha & Ors.

04 Sep 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar, M. S. Sonak, Ravindra V. Ghuge, A. S....

The Bombay High Court affirmed its plenary powers under Article 215 to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings and emphasized that frivolous applications and scandalous statements in court pleadings may attract contempt sanctions.

criminal other Significant Article 215 Constitution of India High Court contempt powers suo motu contempt scandalous statements

Shree Dev Shasan Jain Shwetambar Murtipujak Trust v. Veer Tower CHS Ltd.

04 Sep 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that a cooperative housing society formed by flat purchasers inherits the arbitration agreements in their individual contracts with the developer, and a third party claiming through the developer can invoke arbitration, directing constitution of an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate the disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement veritable party non-signatory Section 11 Arbitration Act

Shree Dev Shasan Jain Shwetambar Murtipujak Trust v. Veer Tower CHS Ltd.

04 Sep 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that a society formed by flat purchasers inherits the arbitration agreements contained in their individual contracts with the developer, and non-signatory parties claiming through a signatory can enforce arbitration agreements, directing disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement privity of contract non-signatory party veritable party

Rhea Parthasarthy v. Sonali Nimesh Lokhandwala

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held that a nominee of immovable property excluded from a Will has no caveatable interest in testamentary proceedings and dismissed the caveat filed by such nominee, affirming that only legal heirs or beneficiaries challenging the Will's validity may maintain a caveat.

civil appeal_allowed Significant caveatable interest nomination joint will letters of administration

Sudhir Ramchandra Gogi v. Navita Balraj Jadal and others

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed a belated interim application to set aside an ex parte probate order, emphasizing limitation, proper service, and penalizing abuse of judicial process with exemplary costs.

civil petition_dismissed Significant probate testamentary suit Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons

Rahul Pittu Savalkar and Ors. v. Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Anr.

03 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court held that long-serving daily wage forest workers are entitled to permanent status and benefits despite absence of sanctioned posts, ruling denial as unfair labour practice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant permanent employment daily wage workers unfair labour practice MRTU & PULP Act

Shikalgar Co-operative Housing Society v. State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition quashing land resumption orders against a cooperative housing society that faced genuine construction delays due to area discrepancies and communal riots, emphasizing the need to consider such difficulties before resuming allotted land.

property petition_allowed Significant land allotment cooperative housing society construction delay extension of time

Babita Pawan Jha v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court condemned police negligence in a hit-and-run death investigation, ordered a departmental inquiry against the investigating officer, and directed expeditious trial after the delayed charge-sheet filing.

criminal petition_allowed Significant hit-and-run investigation delay dereliction of duty charge-sheet

Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan v. The Competent Authority

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the SAFEMA forfeiture order, holding that the petitioners failed to prove good faith purchase or ownership, and the forfeiture order stands final and binding.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant SAFEMA forfeiture illegally acquired property good faith purchaser

Nawbar Mamu Irani v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition, holding that the accused's arrest complied with statutory procedural safeguards and did not violate fundamental rights.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Illegal arrest Fundamental rights Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023

Mayur Nitin Nagonkar v. Additional Commissioner, Kokan Division & Ors.

03 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a licensee after expiry of a registered Leave and Licence Agreement under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, affirming the limited jurisdiction of the Competent Authority and rejecting claims based on collateral transactions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999 Section 24 Leave and Licence Agreement eviction

Sancket Ameet Kamdar v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court allowed transfer of a Domestic Violence complaint to the Family Court to be heard along with a divorce petition to avoid multiplicity of litigation and conflicting findings.

family appeal_allowed Significant Domestic Violence Transfer of Proceedings Family Court Divorce Petition