High Court of Bombay

3,981 judgments

Year:

Rhea Parthasarthy v. Sonali Nimesh Lokhandwala

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held that a nominee of immovable property excluded from a Will has no caveatable interest in testamentary proceedings and dismissed the caveat filed by such nominee, affirming that only legal heirs or beneficiaries challenging the Will's validity may maintain a caveat.

civil appeal_allowed Significant caveatable interest nomination joint will letters of administration

Sudhir Ramchandra Gogi v. Navita Balraj Jadal and others

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed a belated interim application to set aside an ex parte probate order, emphasizing limitation, proper service, and penalizing abuse of judicial process with exemplary costs.

civil petition_dismissed Significant probate testamentary suit Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons

Rahul Pittu Savalkar and Ors. v. Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Anr.

03 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court held that long-serving daily wage forest workers are entitled to permanent status and benefits despite absence of sanctioned posts, ruling denial as unfair labour practice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant permanent employment daily wage workers unfair labour practice MRTU & PULP Act

Shikalgar Co-operative Housing Society v. State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition quashing land resumption orders against a cooperative housing society that faced genuine construction delays due to area discrepancies and communal riots, emphasizing the need to consider such difficulties before resuming allotted land.

property petition_allowed Significant land allotment cooperative housing society construction delay extension of time

Babita Pawan Jha v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court condemned police negligence in a hit-and-run death investigation, ordered a departmental inquiry against the investigating officer, and directed expeditious trial after the delayed charge-sheet filing.

criminal petition_allowed Significant hit-and-run investigation delay dereliction of duty charge-sheet

Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan v. The Competent Authority

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the SAFEMA forfeiture order, holding that the petitioners failed to prove good faith purchase or ownership, and the forfeiture order stands final and binding.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant SAFEMA forfeiture illegally acquired property good faith purchaser

Nawbar Mamu Irani v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition, holding that the accused's arrest complied with statutory procedural safeguards and did not violate fundamental rights.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Illegal arrest Fundamental rights Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023

Mayur Nitin Nagonkar v. Additional Commissioner, Kokan Division & Ors.

03 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a licensee after expiry of a registered Leave and Licence Agreement under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, affirming the limited jurisdiction of the Competent Authority and rejecting claims based on collateral transactions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999 Section 24 Leave and Licence Agreement eviction

Sancket Ameet Kamdar v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court allowed transfer of a Domestic Violence complaint to the Family Court to be heard along with a divorce petition to avoid multiplicity of litigation and conflicting findings.

family appeal_allowed Significant Domestic Violence Transfer of Proceedings Family Court Divorce Petition

Vijay Narayan Sawant v. State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court quashed the Charity Commissioner's sanction for sale of Trust property under Section 36(1) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, holding that the sale was not shown to be necessary or in the Trust's interest and the sanction was granted without proper application of mind.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950 Section 36(1) Charity Commissioner sanction for alienation

Manoj Sattyavijay v. Rinku Manoj Sattyavijay

03 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court allowed the husband's transfer application to consolidate matrimonial proceedings in Dhule, holding that the balance of convenience favors the husband's forum despite the wife's financial constraints.

family appeal_allowed Significant transfer of proceedings matrimonial dispute Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 restitution of conjugal rights

Pratap Arjundas Valecha v. Viresh Gangadhar Talajia

03 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlord's bona fide and reasonable requirement of premises for family use, emphasizing liberal construction of personal requirement and the sufficiency of unimpeached evidence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction rent control personal requirement

Aarti Modi v. Pushpaben Popatlal Modi

03 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, a wife has a statutory right to reside in the matrimonial home as a shared household irrespective of tenancy rights, and quashed an eviction order against her.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 right to residence shared household gratuitous licensee

7 Bungalows, off J.P. Road Versova, Andheri (W), Mumbai v. Aaron Joseph Mathias

03 Sep 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed amendment of a divorce petition to include reliefs for partition of jointly purchased property, holding that due diligence was shown and the Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction over matrimonial property disputes.

family appeal_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence Family Courts Act 1984

The General Manager, Greater Mumbai Milk Scheme & Anr. v. Bhakti Gajanan Masurkar

03 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's order directing payment of gratuity and pension to a retired employee despite delayed vacation of government quarters during COVID-19, ruling that withholding dues on penal rent grounds constituted unfair labour practice.

labor petition_dismissed Significant unfair labour practice penal rent government residential quarters COVID-19 lockdown

Qwik Supply Chain Pvt Ltd v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

03 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed refund of stamp duty paid on unregistered, uncompleted transfer deeds without a registered cancellation deed, emphasizing fairness and rejecting hypertechnical grounds for denial.

civil petition_allowed Significant stamp duty refund Maharashtra Stamp Act 1958 Deed of Cancellation Section 47(c)(5)

Armstrong Machine Builders Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra

03 Sep 2025 · MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court allowed refund of stamp duty paid on a void Share Purchase Agreement, holding that limitation must be reckoned from the date the transaction became void due to government rejection, not from stamp purchase date.

civil petition_allowed Significant stamp duty refund limitation period Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Section 47

Dr. Rajendra Shankar Mahamuni v. Fergusson College, Pune & Ors.

03 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhad

The Bombay High Court allowed a retired lecturer's petition directing grant of pension under the Old Pension Scheme based on the commencement date of recruitment process before the cut-off, giving precedence to the Marathi version of the Government Resolution and subsequent state notification allowing option for OPS.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme Defined Contribution Pension Scheme Government Resolution 31-10-2005 Government Resolution 02-02-2024

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. G.B. Khetade

03 Sep 2025 · MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award directing BSNL to reinstate a daily wage worker terminated without inquiry, granting back wages despite his criminal acquittal on benefit of doubt.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F termination without inquiry casual labourer

Anil Sitaram Gosavi v. State of Maharashtra

02 Sep 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; Advait M. Sethna

The High Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC but modified the sentence by removing the impermissible minimum 20-year imprisonment rider, affirming the reliability of child eyewitness testimony and clarifying sentencing limits in murder cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC child eyewitness life imprisonment