High Court of Bombay

3,981 judgments

Year:

Rakesh Baban Gohar v. The State of Maharashtra

29 Sep 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for sexual offences against his minor daughter under the POCSO Act and IPC but commuted the life sentence to the period already served, emphasizing the reliability of the victim's testimony and inadmissibility of electronic evidence without proper certification.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault child victim electronic evidence

Dipakbhai Premabhai Patel & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a meritorious ST candidate resident in the merged Union Territory is entitled to reservation benefits and directed her admission by allocating a vacant ST seat without disturbing existing admissions.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe reservation Dadra and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu NEET admission

Vasantha Perampally Nayak v. State of Maharashtra

29 Sep 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court held the petitioner's arrest illegal due to unauthorized invocation of Section 409 IPC by police, ordered compensation and departmental enquiry against responsible officers.

criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal arrest Section 409 IPC Section 41A CrPC police abuse of power

Shree Construction Company v. Bagwe Housing Private Ltd.

29 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed the suit against certain defendants as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action, holding that mere awareness does not create privity of contract and permitting summary rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC limitation privity of contract Deeds of Surrender

All India Siemens Employees Union v. Siemens Workers Union

26 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The High Court upheld the Industrial Court’s finding that the respondent union had majority membership and complied with statutory requirements, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to recognition under the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

labor petition_dismissed Significant trade union recognition MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 majority membership Industrial Court

State Bank of India v. Amum Builders

25 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that a stay on the entire possession decree includes a stay on mesne profits proceedings, and accordingly stayed the mesne profits petition pending final disposal of the revision application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits stay of proceedings Order XX Rule 12 Order XLI Rule 5

Vicky @ Vikky Vilas Kamble v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court held that delayed production of the petitioner beyond 24 hours of effective arrest and arrest without recorded reasons violated constitutional and statutory mandates, ordering his immediate release.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Article 22(2) Constitution of India Section 35 BNSS Section 58 BNSS arrest procedure

Vinod Kshirsagar Wasnik v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe · AIR Online 2024 BOM 687

The Bombay High Court held that a lecturer appointed prior to mandatory NET/SET qualifications and granted university approval and CAS benefits is entitled to pension and gratuity under the Old Pension Scheme from the initial appointment date.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme NET/SET qualification Career Advancement Scheme pension entitlement

Rajendrakumar Gore v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a lecturer appointed before mandatory NET/SET qualifications and granted exemption is entitled to pension and gratuity under the Old Pension Scheme, directing payment with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme NET/SET exemption Career Advancement Scheme pension benefits

Ketan Vallabhji Veera v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

24 Sep 2025 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court held that disputes arising from partnership dissolution agreements qualify as commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing applications to return or renumber the plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Partnership dissolution Commercial dispute Order VII Rule 10 CPC

Faizal Salim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra & ABC

24 Sep 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition to quash criminal proceedings under the POCSO Act despite victim's consent and subsequent marriage, reaffirming that such cases cannot be quashed post-majority consent when the victim was a minor at the time of offence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant POCSO Act quashing of criminal proceedings victim consent minor victim

Mr. Vinay s/o. Jagannath Mhatre v. Administrative/Establishment Officer & Ors.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a retired employee validly promoted and exempted from a departmental exam is entitled to pension based on higher grade pay and recovery of alleged excess payments from retiral benefits is impermissible if it causes hardship.

administrative petition_allowed Significant time bound promotion grade pay fixation departmental qualifying examination recovery of excess payment

Hukumchand Govindrao Aamdare & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

23 Sep 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court held that appointment of an Administrator without deciding a pending extension proposal for the Managing Committee under the APMC Act is illegal and directed immediate elections and restoration of the elected body.

administrative petition_allowed Significant APMC Act 1963 Section 15A Administrator appointment Extension of term

Pandurang Tatu Keni v. Laxman Sakharam Patil

23 Sep 2025 · M.M. Sathaye
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the landlord’s bona-fide requirement for eviction despite subsequent events, setting aside the appellate court’s reversal and confirming eviction of the tenant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bona-fide requirement eviction Bombay Rents Act landlord-tenant dispute

Anupriya Santosh Unnithan v. Santosh Ramchandra Unnithan

23 Sep 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside a Family Court divorce decree granted on the ground of cruelty without reasons or evidence, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judgments and fair opportunity to contest matrimonial proceedings.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 divorce cruelty family court

Hukumchand Govindrao Aamdare & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

23 Sep 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The court held that appointing an Administrator without deciding a pending extension proposal under the APMC Act is illegal, directing restoration of the elected Managing Committee and immediate conduct of elections.

administrative petition_allowed Significant APMC Act 1963 Section 14 Section 15 Section 15A

wp58162025 07981473

23 Sep 2025 · Jitendra Jain; M. S. Sonak

The Bombay High Court held that omission of CGST Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) without a savings clause causes lapse of pending proceedings under them, invalidating related show cause notices and recovery orders.

tax appeal_allowed Significant CGST Rules 2017 Rule 89(4B) Rule 96(10) Omission of statutory rules

Unique Integrated Transport And Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd. v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

23 Sep 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court upheld that interest under an arbitral award must be computed as simple interest on all claims awarded, excluding pre-award interest from the principal for post-award interest calculation, and dismissed MTNL's attempt to reopen settled issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitral award interest computation simple interest compound interest

National Pharmaceuticals v. Joint Commissioner (K.D.)

22 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court quashed stop production orders issued without prior hearing under Rule 85(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, emphasizing mandatory procedural fairness before suspending or cancelling pharmaceutical manufacturing licenses.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Rule 85(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 stop production order natural justice

Rupesh Laxman Gaikwad v. Commissioner of Police, Thane & Ors.

22 Sep 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court quashed a detention order due to an unexplained one-year delay in execution, holding that such delay breaks the necessary proximate link and undermines the detaining authority's satisfaction.

criminal petition_allowed Significant detention order delay in execution subjective satisfaction live and proximate link