High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Sushant Bhausaheb Sarode v. Union of India

01 Oct 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that height fractions of 0.5 cm and above must be rounded off at the Physical Standard Test stage, allowing petitioners marginally below the prescribed height to qualify for further recruitment stages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Physical Standard Test height relaxation rounding off height Central Armed Police Forces recruitment

Riya Suralk v. Rahul Suralkar

01 Oct 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court set aside a Family Court divorce decree granted solely on the wife's absence, holding that courts must independently assess evidence and record reasoned findings before granting divorce on cruelty grounds.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce cruelty Special Marriage Act, 1954 ex parte proceedings

Mukesh Bansilal Shah v. Mahesh Mithalal Trivedi & Ors.

30 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Applicants’ intervention in a Testamentary Suit for lack of tenancy rights and locus, upheld the Administrator’s authority to seal premises, and imposed exemplary costs for misuse of judicial process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Testamentary Suit Locus Standi Tenancy Rights Administrator

Lalit C. Joshi v. The Chairman & Managing Director, Bank of Baroda

30 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court held that the Bank of Baroda's fresh interview contrary to Supreme Court directions was unjust, granting the petitioner promotion and monetary benefits retrospectively.

civil appeal_allowed Significant promotion departmental promotion committee APAR annual confidential report

Pradip Ramesh Shinde v. Malegaon Municipal Corporation

30 Sep 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that long-term daily wage employees performing essential services are entitled to permanency and quashed their termination despite financial constraints cited by the Corporation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant permanency in service unfair labour practice daily wage employees temporary employment

Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. City and Industrial Development Corporation

30 Sep 2025 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court held that baseless and repeated derogatory allegations against judges and the judiciary constitute criminal contempt warranting initiation of contempt proceedings and directed reporting to the Chief Justice for further action.

constitutional other Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 scandalising the court derogatory remarks

The State of Maharashtra v. Aakash Sandhi Bindu

30 Sep 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court cancelled bail granted in a gang rape case, holding that the Trial Court erred by ignoring material evidence and improperly considering the accused's impending marriage as a ground for bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation gang rape medical evidence prima facie case

Omkar Rajendra Bhosle v. Commissioner of Police, Pune City & Ors.

30 Sep 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unjustified delay in recording evidence and passing the order, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines to protect personal liberty.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention delay in detention order in-camera statements personal liberty

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dagdabai Gida @ Bhika Shinde

30 Sep 2025 · S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held the insurer liable for compensation despite non-issuance of a formal policy after cover-note expiry, enhanced the compensation based on minimum wages, and dismissed the insurer’s appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act insurance cover-note insurance policy issuance liability of insurer

Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. v. Mediacom Communication Private Limited

29 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed the suit against Mediacom Communication Pvt. Ltd. for non-disclosure of cause of action and limitation, affirming the distinct legal identity of related corporate entities and rejecting late impleadment attempts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 7 Rule 11 CPC cause of action corporate veil limitation

Aruna Nilesh Shah v. Inter Globe Services & Ors.

29 Sep 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court allowed a Section 11 application appointing an arbitrator to resolve disputes over the amount payable by a partnership firm to a deceased partner's successor, holding that such disputes fall within the arbitration clause despite prior family settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement partnership deed mutually agreed amount Consent Terms

Rakesh Baban Gohar v. The State of Maharashtra

29 Sep 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for sexual offences against his minor daughter under the POCSO Act and IPC but commuted the life sentence to the period already served, emphasizing the reliability of the victim's testimony and inadmissibility of electronic evidence without proper certification.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault child victim electronic evidence

Dipakbhai Premabhai Patel & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a meritorious ST candidate resident in the merged Union Territory is entitled to reservation benefits and directed her admission by allocating a vacant ST seat without disturbing existing admissions.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe reservation Dadra and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu NEET admission

Vasantha Perampally Nayak v. State of Maharashtra

29 Sep 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court held the petitioner's arrest illegal due to unauthorized invocation of Section 409 IPC by police, ordered compensation and departmental enquiry against responsible officers.

criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal arrest Section 409 IPC Section 41A CrPC police abuse of power

Shree Construction Company v. Bagwe Housing Private Ltd.

29 Sep 2025 · Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed the suit against certain defendants as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action, holding that mere awareness does not create privity of contract and permitting summary rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC limitation privity of contract Deeds of Surrender

All India Siemens Employees Union v. Siemens Workers Union

26 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The High Court upheld the Industrial Court’s finding that the respondent union had majority membership and complied with statutory requirements, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to recognition under the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

labor petition_dismissed Significant trade union recognition MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 majority membership Industrial Court

State Bank of India v. Amum Builders

25 Sep 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that a stay on the entire possession decree includes a stay on mesne profits proceedings, and accordingly stayed the mesne profits petition pending final disposal of the revision application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits stay of proceedings Order XX Rule 12 Order XLI Rule 5

Vicky @ Vikky Vilas Kamble v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court held that delayed production of the petitioner beyond 24 hours of effective arrest and arrest without recorded reasons violated constitutional and statutory mandates, ordering his immediate release.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Article 22(2) Constitution of India Section 35 BNSS Section 58 BNSS arrest procedure

Vinod Kshirsagar Wasnik v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe · AIR Online 2024 BOM 687

The Bombay High Court held that a lecturer appointed prior to mandatory NET/SET qualifications and granted university approval and CAS benefits is entitled to pension and gratuity under the Old Pension Scheme from the initial appointment date.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme NET/SET qualification Career Advancement Scheme pension entitlement

Rajendrakumar Gore v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a lecturer appointed before mandatory NET/SET qualifications and granted exemption is entitled to pension and gratuity under the Old Pension Scheme, directing payment with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme NET/SET exemption Career Advancement Scheme pension benefits