High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

M/s. Borosil Glass Works Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Sales Tax

30 Apr 2002 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court upheld the 6% reduction on furnace oil purchases under Rule 41D(3)(a) of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, rejecting the claim for full set-off on branch transfers.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Rule 41D Bombay Sales Tax Rules furnace oil set-off 6% reduction

Zhakir Mehfuj Alam Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

23 Apr 2002 · Prasanna B. Varale; V. G. Bisht
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a step-father for sexually assaulting his minor step-children under the POCSO Act, rejecting delay and inconsistencies as grounds for acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault delay in FIR victim testimony

Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

31 Mar 2002 · DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR; KAMAL KHATA · [2021] 130 taxmann.com 178 (SC)
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of interest disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, holding that the AO must record satisfaction before applying Rule 8D and that interest cannot be disallowed when sufficient interest-free funds exist.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Rule 8D disallowance of interest expenditure interest-free funds

Kumar Shailendra Sinha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Feb 2002 · S.V. Gangapurwala, ACJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J.
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Bombay High Court upheld SPMCIL's promotion policy based on merit-cum-suitability and seniority, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to promotions effected through interview-based comparative assessment.

labor petition_dismissed Significant promotion merit-cum-seniority suitability seniority

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. The Empire Building Occupants Welfare Association

30 Jan 2002 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld an interim injunction protecting the plaintiff’s possession against forcible dispossession by MCGM without due process, emphasizing settled possession and discretionary restraint despite lease expiry disputes.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction leasehold rights possession due process of law

New India Insurance Company Ltd. v. M/S. KLM Engineering Company Ltd.

02 Nov 2001 · Amit Borkar, J.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that the Estate Officer failed to apply proper mind in eviction proceedings under the Public Premises Act, emphasizing the necessity of prima facie satisfaction, fairness, and bona fide need by public authorities.

property petition_dismissed Significant Public Premises Act unauthorised occupation prima facie satisfaction eviction proceedings

Veena Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

30 Oct 2001 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Bombay High Court upheld penalty under Section 271(1)(c) against a company for using a partnership and revaluation transactions as a device to evade tax, rejecting the appellant's claim of full disclosure.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) penalty concealment of income partnership firm device to evade tax

Dilip Bobde Patil v. Laksons India Private Limited & Ors.

17 Sep 2001 · Amit Borkar, J.

The High Court upheld the statutory right of flat purchasers to form an independent cooperative housing society under MOFA and the MCS Act, quashing the order rejecting registration for lack of parent society consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act cooperative housing society nominal membership

Abhijit Ganpat Samant; Rajeshree Shirwadkar v. State of Maharashtra; Maharashtra State Election Commission; Election Commission of India; Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

07 Sep 2001 · A.A. Sayed; Abhay Ahuja
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Bombay High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Ordinance increasing Mumbai Municipal Councillors from 227 to 236 based on the 2011 Census, rejecting claims of arbitrariness and lack of empirical data.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Ordinance validity Article 14 manifest arbitrariness

Milind Nandkumar Kulkarni & Ors. v. Kirloskar Ebara Pumps Ltd.

30 Aug 2001 · Sandeep V. Marne

The High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that contract workers were not employees of the principal employer, dismissing petitions challenging termination and confirming the necessity of contractors as parties in industrial dispute references.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship contract workers Labour Court Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Mr. Suresh Vasudeo Dalvi v. Priyadarshini Indira Gandhi Kreeda Sankul & Ors.

08 Aug 2001 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court’s order confirming the petitioner’s dismissal for demanding illegal gratification, affirming the admissibility of hearsay evidence and the narrow scope of revisional jurisdiction in domestic enquiries.

labor petition_dismissed Significant domestic enquiry hearsay evidence revisionary jurisdiction MRTU & PULP Act

Late Shri Kashinath Devram and Babubai Thorat Charitable Trust v. State of Maharashtra

14 Jun 2001 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain · 2025:BHC-AS:3984-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of land acquisition partly funded by the State despite delayed Section 6 declaration due to court stay, affirming that partial State funding suffices for public purpose under the Land Acquisition Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 6 declaration public purpose

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Mrs. Piroza Parvez Driver & Ors.

18 Apr 2001 · Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction and mesne profit orders against HPCL, holding that lease renewal requires formal execution and State action must be fair and reasonable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease renewal eviction mesne profit State as landlord

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Piroza Parvez Driver & Ors.

18 Apr 2001 · Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction and mesne profit orders against HPCL, holding that lease renewal requires strict compliance and State entities must act fairly and reasonably in lease matters.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease renewal eviction suit mesne profits Presidency Small Cause Courts Act

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Pune v. Sandvik Asia Pvt. Ltd.

01 Apr 2001 · Dhiraj Singh Thakur; Abhay Ahuja
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing management fees paid to associated enterprises, provisions for obsolete inventory, and set-off of EOU losses against other business income under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant management fees associated enterprise transfer pricing provision for obsolete inventory

M/s. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Mumbai Mahanagar Palika & Ors.

16 Mar 2001 · M. S. Sonak; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging octroi valuation based on MRP, holding that absence of protest and statutory remedy precludes relief and refund would cause unjust enrichment.

tax petition_dismissed Significant octroi duty valuation of goods Maximum Retail Price invoice value

Medical Superintendent, Rural Hospital v. Rajashree Lakshman Yadav

09 Mar 2001 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Bombay High Court held that temporary government appointments without proper selection process do not confer a right to permanency, setting aside Industrial Court orders directing regularisation of such employees.

labour appeal_allowed Significant temporary appointment permanency regularisation back door entry

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. The Union of India & Ors.

23 Feb 2001 · Nitin Jamdar; Gauri Godse
Cites 0 · Cited by 43

The Bombay High Court upheld the Customs authorities' power to demand 100% bank guarantees for differential duty after SVB investigation reports and show-cause notices, limiting Circular No.5/2016's applicability to the investigation phase only.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Section 18(1) Customs Act Special Valuation Branch provisional assessment bank guarantee

The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra

20 Jan 2001 · K. R. Shriram; Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Bombay High Court held that entertainment duty cannot be levied on optional mobile phone charges at race courses as such payments are not mandatory for admission and the levy by Government Resolution is invalid.

tax petition_allowed Significant entertainment duty payment for admission mobile phone charges Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923

The Chief Officer, Alibag Municipal Council v. Mamta N. Patil & Ors.

18 Jan 2001 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court upheld Industrial Court orders directing regularization of municipal daily wage employees who worked against sanctioned posts for over ten years, rejecting reliance on Model Standing Order 4C for State Instrumentalities lacking power to create posts.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant regularization permanency daily wage workers Model Standing Order 4C