High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Sachin Deoram Sable v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & State of Maharashtra

27 Feb 2020 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that the petitioner met the experience criteria in the recruitment advertisement and quashed MSRTC's cancellation of the selection process, directing the petitioner’s appointment as Divisional Controller.

administrative petition_allowed Significant experience requirement commercial organization recruitment advertisement employee strength

Ajay Boraste v. The State of Maharashtra

24 Feb 2020 · Dipankar Datta, CJ; G. S. Kulkarni, J.

The Bombay High Court held that the Nashik Municipal Corporation's Standing Committee nominations must reflect the correct proportional representation of parties based on updated councillor strength, entitling Shiv-Sena to an additional seat.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act 1949 Section 31-A Standing Committee proportional representation

Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd. v. Charmaine Chougule & Ors.

18 Feb 2020 · M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court held that an allottee's right to withdraw and claim refund under RERA is subject to a two-month time limit from the date possession is offered with Occupation Certificate, and possession can be offered despite pending litigation if no injunction exists.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 18 refund Occupation Certificate Allottee right to withdraw

National Centre for the Performing Arts v. Union of India

13 Feb 2020 · Nitin Jamdar; Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that under Section 124(2) of the Finance Act, 2019, interest paid prior to issuance of a Show Cause Notice must be deducted from tax dues payable under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, directing the Designated Committee to reconsider the petitioner's claim accordingly.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Section 124(2) Finance Act 2019 tax dues interest payment adjustment

Swati Mangesh Sawant v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

10 Feb 2020 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court held that a Recovery Certificate under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act cannot be executed by attaching property no longer owned by the borrower, where the third party purchaser has paid full consideration and possession, and the borrower admits the sale.

civil petition_allowed Significant Recovery Certificate Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Section 99 MCS Act Section 101 MCS Act

Sharekhan Limited v. Darshini Shah

10 Feb 2020 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards that wrongly relied on an NSE circular to alter contractual brokerage obligations, holding that failure to secure fresh KYC does not affect the client's liability to pay brokerage under the original agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 NSE circular 10 February 2020 inactive trading account

Bhiku Anna Tambe & Laxman Anna Tambe v. Ganpat Anna Tambe & Ors.

07 Feb 2020 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that the Lokayukta lacks jurisdiction to decide civil inheritance disputes and quashed its order directing cooperative society payments, emphasizing adherence to natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Lokayukta jurisdiction natural justice civil dispute inheritance dispute

Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta v. Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal and HDFC Bank Ltd.

05 Feb 2020 · Nitin Jamdar; Abhay Ahuja
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court stayed the Recovery Officer's order directing civil arrest of loan defaulters, emphasizing the need for jurisdictional facts, natural justice, and a time-bound opportunity to contest before finalizing such stringent recovery measures.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Rule 73 Second Schedule Income Tax Act civil arrest Recovery Officer powers

State of Maharashtra v. Sudhir Bhagwat Kalekar

05 Feb 2020 · Dhiraj Singh Thakur; Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that correction of date of birth in government service records must be sought within five years of appointment and dismissed a late application filed shortly before retirement, emphasizing the need for finality and administrative certainty.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant correction of date of birth Rule 38 Maharashtra Civil Services Rules limitation period government servant service records

Illiyas Mangroo Shaikh v. Bombay Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking

05 Feb 2020 · Amit Borkar
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Bombay High Court held that consumers are not entitled to interest on statutory deposits made under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003, when the appeal succeeds and the assessment is set aside.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 127 deposit unauthorised use of electricity interest on statutory deposit

Prakash Narayan Harake v. Anil Kisan Walunj

29 Jan 2020 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court held that upon setting aside an election under Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, a fresh election must be held and the runner-up cannot be declared elected.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Section 15(2) election petition disqualification

Leyla Mohmoodi v. The Additional Commissioner of Customs

28 Jan 2020 · G. S. Kulkarni; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that the unauthorized disposal and sale of seized gold jewellery without notice and reasons violated statutory and constitutional rights, directing return or compensation to the owners.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 110 Seizure and disposal Gold jewellery

Canara Bank v. Deputy Commissioner

24 Jan 2020 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Bombay High Court held that a secured creditor with a registered charge under the SARFAESI Act has priority over State tax dues, and sale of secured assets passes clear title free from State encumbrances absent statutory compliance by tax authorities.

civil petition_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 26E secured creditor priority Sales Tax encumbrance

Anita Agarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Jan 2020 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that exporters are entitled to interest on delayed GST refunds under Section 56 of the CGST Act even if their refund claims were under investigation due to red-flagging, except for a reasonable 30-day investigation period.

tax petition_allowed Significant CGST Act Section 56 interest on delayed refund red-flagged exporters

Jyoti Plastic Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

20 Jan 2020 · Ujjal Bhuyan; Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, tax dues must be the reduced amounts accepted in the original order, not the original demand, preventing petitioners from being placed in a worse position due to appeals or scheme declarations.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Sabka Vishwas Scheme tax dues show cause notice order in original

Anand Shyam Agarwal v. State Bank of India

14 Jan 2020 · M. S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court quashed orders declaring petitioners as willful defaulters due to non-furnishing of the complete forensic audit report, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant willful defaulter natural justice forensic audit report master circular

Mangal Kiran Waghmode & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

13 Jan 2020 · S. C. Gupte; Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court upheld the framing of disqualification charges against Zilla Parishad councillors for defection, ruling that procedural defects were curable and the existence of the political party was established despite absence of Gazette notification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986 Zilla Parishad Party disqualification proceedings whip

State of Maharashtra v. Chhaya Vishwas Bhosale

11 Jan 2020 · A. S. Chandurkar; Jitendra Jain
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing compassionate appointment after prolonged delay, holding that such appointment is not a vested right and must be granted within a reasonable time to serve its benevolent purpose.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment Government Resolution 2005 age limit substitution

Shailesh K. Bothra; Mukesh C. Karwa; Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra; Chief Commissioner of Sales Tax; Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax; Additional Commissioner of State Tax; Joint Commissioner of State Tax

10 Jan 2020 · G. S. Kulkarni; Jitendra Jain

Auction purchasers of property sold under SARFAESI Act on 'as is where is basis' with knowledge of sales tax dues are liable to discharge those dues as the statutory charge under MVAT Act runs with the property and attachment order subsists.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act MVAT Act secured creditor sales tax dues

M/s. Unique Enterprises v. Union of India

07 Jan 2020 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that tax dues pending adjudication as on 30 June 2019 fall under the Litigation category of the SVLDRS scheme, entitling the petitioner to 70% relief and quashed the demand under the Arrears category.

tax petition_allowed Significant Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme 2019 Finance Act 2019 Section 124 Litigation category Arrears category