High Court of Bombay

3,981 judgments

Year:

High Court On Its Own Motion v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

20 May 2015 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Bombay High Court mandated all municipal and state authorities to maintain roads and footpaths safely using scientific methods, establish effective grievance redressal systems, and ensure accountability to protect citizens' fundamental rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant potholes road maintenance municipal corporations grievance redressal mechanism

Shri Swami Samarth Apang Seva Mandal v. Madhukar Dashrath Ghodke

19 May 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a B.Ed. qualification is not equivalent to the mandatory D.Ed. for primary school teachers under the Special School Code, setting aside reinstatement of an untrained teacher lacking the prescribed qualification.

labor petition_allowed Significant Special School Code 1997 D.Ed. qualification B.Ed. qualification primary school teacher eligibility

Dolphin Co. Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

14 May 2015 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 0 · Cited by 15

The Bombay High Court held CIDCO's refusal to approve an additional member and withhold Occupancy Certificate for a completed building was arbitrary and illegal, directing immediate issuance of the certificate and approval.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Occupancy Certificate CIDCO Co-operative Housing Society Additional Member Admission

ICICI Bank Limited v. Union of India

11 May 2015 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court refused to quash a delayed show cause notice or direct refund without adjudication, instead ordering expeditious adjudication of service tax refund claims on interchange fees paid under protest.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax interchange fees refund under protest show cause notice

FICCI-Multiplex Association of India v. State of Maharashtra

08 May 2015 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court upheld the State's power to levy entertainment duty on convenience fees charged for online ticket booking under the Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, dismissing challenges to the amendment as constitutionally valid and within legislative competence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act entertainment duty convenience fees online ticket booking

Mangesh Sadanand Masane & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

27 Apr 2015 · A.S. Gadkari; Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants who attacked the deceased with deadly weapons, rejecting their plea of sudden fight under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC murder premeditation

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. The Indian Hotels Company Ltd.

20 Apr 2015 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. · 2022 SCC OnLine Bom. 6227

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Municipal Corporation's belated appeals due to inordinate delay and held that bureaucratic inefficiency does not justify condonation of delay under statutory limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay statutory limitation Section 218D Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act government appeals

Ramrao Tukaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra

16 Apr 2015 · Amit Borkar
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking condonation of delay in challenging auction sale, holding that false statements and suppression of facts disentitle petitioners from relief under writ jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay writ jurisdiction suppression of facts false statement on oath

Shrihari Madhav Wagh v. Pandurang Gopal Wagh and Ors.

01 Apr 2015 · N.J. Jamadar

The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the appellate order granting injunction in a co-ownership land dispute, holding that the appellate court erred in interfering with the trial court's discretionary order without cogent evidence of exclusive possession.

civil petition_allowed Significant temporary injunction discretionary order co-ownership partition suit

Sanjivani Abasaheb Karne v. The State of Maharashtra

24 Mar 2015 · S.V. Gangapurwala; Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Bombay High Court upheld cancellation of candidatures for failure to possess valid non-creamy layer certificates at the time of application, holding that false declarations in recruitment applications justify disqualification.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant non-creamy layer certificate reservation recruitment misrepresentation

Jitendra M. Doshi v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

13 Mar 2015 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of a waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, holding that the petitioner failed to satisfy the statutory conditions of genuine hardship, default beyond control, and cooperation.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 220(2A) Income Tax Act waiver of interest genuine hardship default beyond control

National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Anita Jayant Bagal

03 Mar 2015 · Rajesh S. Patil
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld the MACT award holding the insurer liable to pay compensation despite alleged non-registration of the vehicle, as the insurer failed to prove breach of policy terms.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Insurance Policy Breach Vehicle Registration Third-Party Liability

Janardan Agarwal v. Rajkumar Brijlal Singh Gond

17 Feb 2015 · Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court dismissed the employer's appeal against the Commissioner’s award of 50% disability compensation and interest from the date of accident under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.

labor appeal_dismissed Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 functional disability interest on compensation course of employment

Ritesh @ Rajan Janaji Bhalerao v. The State of Maharashtra

13 Feb 2015 · M.S. Sonak; S.M. Modak

The Bombay High Court upheld Ritesh's conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory but acquitted Deepak due to insufficient evidence against him.

criminal appeal_allowed (for Deepak), appeal_dismissed (for Ritesh) Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory section 27 Indian Evidence Act murder

Anil Anantrao Naik v. Indumati Anantrao Naik

12 Feb 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne

The High Court upheld concurrent findings that the plaintiff was the rightful owner and the defendants were trespassers, dismissing appeals challenging eviction and ownership claims under the Benami Transactions Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 gratuitous licensee possession suit cross-examination

The Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi) v. The Union of India

04 Feb 2015 · G. S. Kulkarni; Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Bombay High Court held that reopening an income tax assessment under Section 148 based on material already considered in the original assessment is impermissible and amounts to a mere change of opinion, thereby quashing the reassessment notice and order.

tax petition_allowed Significant reopening of assessment Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 147 Income Tax Act change of opinion

Krantikari Kamgar Union v. The Collector/Labour Commissioner

27 Jan 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court upheld the Labour Commissioner's order permitting closure of Hindalco's undertaking, ruling that review applications under section 25-O filed within one year may be decided after expiry and that contract workers have locus to oppose closure.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25-O closure of industrial undertaking contract workers

Alka Bhausaheb Bhad v. Mr. Bhausaheb Ramrao Bhad

19 Jan 2015 · Rajesh S. Patil

The High Court restored maintenance granted to a second wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding that strict proof of marriage is not required and a man cannot deny maintenance by concealing a subsisting first marriage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 125 CrPC maintenance second wife customary marriage

Hem Prabhakar Shah v. State of Maharashtra

06 Jan 2015 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court quashed the Lookout Circular against a Singapore citizen accused of fraud, releasing his travel documents upon his undertaking to cooperate with investigation and trial.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Lookout Circular OCI Card Personal liberty Travel restrictions

IL & FS Financial Services Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

19 Dec 2014 · Jitendra Jain, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld the levy of penalty under Section 31(4) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act for delayed payment of admitted stamp duty, rejecting the petitioner’s challenge that the interim order reset the payment timeline.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Stamp Act Section 31(4) stamp duty penalty