Delhi High Court
64,767 judgments
Bimal Papers Pvt Ltd v. Jayco Sales
The Delhi High Court held that a written statement in a commercial suit must comply with mandatory procedural requirements and directed the trial court to adjudicate on objections before condoning delay.
Madhuri Goel v. Chandra Prakash & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a pending application under Section 151 CPC for restoration of possession must be decided before directing amendment of the plaint for possession relief, keeping the Trial Court's order in abeyance pending such adjudication.
Vinod Rajoria v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs expedited acquisition and interim compensation for land unlawfully occupied by DDA, rejects alternate land allotment claim, and exempts procedural requirements under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
Jagmohan Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Probate to the petitioner for the last Will of Late Ms. Kulbir Kaur, holding the Will validly executed and uncontested by heirs.
Yuvi Aspiring Pvt. Ltd. v. Manish Sharma and Anr
The Delhi High Court decreed the civil suit in terms of a lawful tripartite settlement for transfer of a registered trademark, closing the dispute under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Mithu Lal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus writ petition for a missing person, directing police to continue investigation and submit periodic status reports without judicial interference.
Sanju Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declined to issue a writ of habeas corpus for a missing child under active police investigation, directing continued investigation and periodic reporting instead.
Susheela v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition concerning a missing minor by directing ongoing police investigation with periodic status reports, refusing direct judicial intervention.
HUGO BOSS TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT GMBH AND CO. KG v. SANDEEP ARORA TRADING AS ARRAS THE BOSS
The Delhi High Court expunged a copyright registration for an artistic work substantially imitating the well-known 'BOSS' trademark, holding the petitioner a 'person aggrieved' entitled to rectification under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Ralson India Limited v. Sham Lal M/S Ramesh Lal and Sons and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that service of trade mark opposition documents by email is valid if an email address is provided as the address for service, and dismissed the appeal against the opposition's dismissal as abandoned for non-filing of evidence.
Yajur Commodities Ltd. v. Suresh Asrani
The Delhi High Court held that time spent pursuing a suit bona fide and diligently in a wrong court can be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, allowing the plaintiff's suit to proceed within limitation despite initial filing in Bombay High Court.
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust & Anr. v. M/S Guru Nanak International & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded damages against a defendant manufacturing counterfeit Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger products, relying on an unchallenged local commissioner’s report as evidence.
M/S RALSON (INDIA) LIMITED v. SHRI SURINDER SINGLA
The Delhi High Court held that service of trademark opposition documents by email to an address provided in Form TM-M is valid service, and failure to file evidence thereafter justifies dismissal of opposition as abandoned.
Raghav Lifestyle Products Unit II v. Suzan Michael Pany Proprietor M / S Suhaan Enterprise
The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement in a trademark dispute as a decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, decreeing the suit and granting partial refund of court fees.
Sarojni Nagar Jhuggi Jhopri Vikas Samiti v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging eviction and Rs. 3 lakh compensation orders for Sarojini Nagar slum dwellers, upholding compliance with the Supreme Court's binding directions.
Rajesh Gupta & Ors. v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DGFT's refusal to extend export obligation period and permit domestic purchase of raw materials under advance authorization, holding the administrative order lawful and not warranting interference under Article 226.
Amitabh Kumar Dubey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner’s medical transfer request as a formal representation and decide it expeditiously in accordance with rules.
Rekha v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the medical unfitness declaration on hypertension for non-compliance with mandatory hospitalization and examination guidelines, directing a fresh medical review.
Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax [LTU] New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to pass fresh assessment orders after expiry of limitation under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, quashing notices to revive time-barred proceedings and directing acceptance of the petitioner’s returned income.
M/S. SHANUS IMPEX v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that Circular No.35/2017-Cus’s restrictions on provisional release of seized goods unlawfully curtail the adjudicating authority’s statutory discretion under Section 110A of the Customs Act and set aside the impugned circular and order accordingly.