Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Arpit Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the NCDRC must record reasons when imposing costs as a pre-condition for notice issuance in consumer revision petitions, setting aside an arbitrary Rs. 25,000 cost imposed without explanation.
Vikhyat Oberoi, Nishita Gupta, Ravi Sharma and Sivam Prakash v. Sagrika D Bajaj
The Delhi High Court modified the Trial Court's conditional deposit requirement in a summary suit between mother and daughter, reducing it to 50% of the principal amount already deposited, and disposed of the petition under Article 227.
Pallavi v. Gaurav Dabas
The Delhi High Court modified the visitation date for a minor child during the pendency of a guardianship petition due to the child's illness, emphasizing the welfare of the child and procedural propriety.
Mr. Akshit Sachdeva v. Rashmi Juneja
The Delhi High Court held that stamp duty on an arbitral award related to property possession must be calculated on the registered sale consideration and mesne profits, not market value, and upheld the executing court's refusal to impound the award for alleged insufficient stamping.
Lalita Thr Lrs. v. Laxmi Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the auction of partition suit property ordered under a final decree, holding that execution cannot be stayed or challenged under Article 227 when an appeal is pending without stay.
Mr. Anand Awasthi v. Jai Durga Traders Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to consider the defendants' application to take on record a written statement accompanied by the prescribed affidavit before proceeding with evidence, staying the trial until disposal.
Sekeletti Doris v. Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused in a commercial quantity narcotics case under the NDPS Act, holding that statutory conditions under Section 37 were not met despite delay in trial and procedural objections.
MYFOJO FOOMIL PVT LTD v. PUSHAAN NAYYAR SOLE PROP YSOSOCIAL MEDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order against the defendant company, allowing filing of written statement subject to costs, to expedite the civil suit proceedings.
Pauline Nalwoga v. Customs
Bail was denied to the accused in a commercial quantity heroin seizure case as she failed to satisfy the mandatory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act despite procedural objections and delay in trial.
Madhu Koda v. State thru CBI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking stay of conviction to enable election contest, reaffirming the principle that conviction stays are granted only in exceptional cases and upholding statutory disqualification under the Representation of People Act.
Rachit Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 323 IPC, holding that matrimonial dispute settlements do not automatically warrant quashing when the victim opposes and allegations of cruelty persist.
Obi Ogochukwa Stephen v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court held that waiver of surety bonds in bail for foreign nationals overstaying visas is not automatic and cash deposit cannot substitute surety, but reduced bond amounts were allowed.
Siddhaant Mohta & Ors. v. Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the issuance of Green Cards to overage dependents was illegal under the Club's Articles of Association, upheld the Administrator's lawful termination of such rights, and rejected the Plaintiffs' claims of enforceable membership or contractual rights.
M/S Sultan Chand and Sons Pvt. Ltd v. Kartik Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that a defendant's right to withdraw an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is valid, and a plaintiff cannot compel arbitration when denying the arbitration clause's applicability.
Deen Bandhu Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for increments in light of a Supreme Court decision within eight weeks, ensuring a reasoned and timely administrative order.
Ramji Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner's HRA arrears claim within eight weeks while upholding an earlier administrative order on pay fixation, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Nupinder Singh v. Director General CISF
The Delhi High Court held that imposing a disciplinary penalty solely on prior punishments after acquittal on substantive charges violates double jeopardy under Article 20(2) and set aside the penalty imposed on the CISF constable.
Amarjeet Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action while keeping the petitioner's rights to further challenge reserved.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sh. Brij Bihari Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service under the Entitlement Rules and Dharamvir Singh precedent.
Kumar Sanjay Jha v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Confirming Authority under the BSF Act is not required to consider a Pre-Confirmation Petition before remitting a matter for revision, aligning with analogous Army Act provisions.