Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
M/S Kansal Enterprises v. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld a mediation-based Settlement Agreement resolving all disputes between M/s Kansal Enterprises and Ansal Properties, disposing of the petition with parties bound by the settlement terms.
Yuvraj Singh Bundhel & Anr. v. M/S Brillient Etoile Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement exists and the petition is timely, disputes must be referred to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without requiring exhaustion of other dispute resolution mechanisms.
Aashna Singhal v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year if not extended, directing the bank to lift embargo on the petitioner's account.
Konica Singhal v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year if not renewed, directing release of the petitioner's bank account.
Bijender Chaudhary v. Malwa Leasing and Credits Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the appointment of a Receiver to take possession of a vehicle due to the borrower's default in loan repayment and refusal to surrender the vehicle.
Aksh Optifibre Limited v. Nantong Siber Communication Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding payment and interest, holding that failure to pay an admitted liability constitutes a dispute and the interest rate awarded did not violate public policy.
M/S EMPORIUM STEEL v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner's delayed VAT refund claims within six weeks and pay statutory interest under Section 42 of the Delhi VAT Act.
VLS Finance Ltd v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that while victims have a right to be heard in criminal proceedings, they do not have an absolute right to be impleaded as parties in revision petitions filed by accused challenging charge framing orders, affirming the primacy of the Public Prosecutor in State prosecutions.
Ajit Pal Singh & Ors. v. Ms. Ankita Chakraborty & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that substantial compliance with demarcation directions precludes contempt proceedings and ownership disputes must be resolved in appropriate civil proceedings.
SAARTHI AIRWAYS PVT LTD v. DR. B.M MISHRA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for alleged disobedience of demarcation orders, holding that demarcation is distinct from ownership and must be challenged in appropriate proceedings.
Sarabjeet Kaur v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings cannot examine the merits of administrative decisions taken pursuant to court orders and dismissed the petition alleging wilful disobedience after the respondent disposed of the representations.
Mamta Kumari & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed continuation of IVF treatment commenced before the ART Act's enforcement, holding that retrospective application of age restrictions violates reproductive autonomy under Article 21.
M/S Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging AAI's rejection of height clearance, holding that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appeal remedy before the Appellate Committee which will grant a personal hearing.
M/S JAI HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. v. TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the electricity supplier must remove its transformer installed on the plaintiff's property at its own cost and pay user charges, rejecting the supplier's claim for compensation and affirming the plaintiff's right to recover damages for unauthorized occupation.
Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Meera Devi v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from family disputes under Sections 323, 452, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Master Devansh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the right to admission under the EWS quota through a computerized draw of lots is limited to the relevant academic year and dismissed the petition filed after that year had ended, while directing alternate educational arrangements.
Yamin Ali v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the appointment of the Administrator of the Delhi Waqf Board, holding that the petitioner must utilize statutory remedies and that no prima facie ground existed to quash the appointment.
Petitioner/aggrieved woman v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed constitution of an Internal Complaints Committee and impleaded a delinquent director to ensure compliance with the POSH Act, emphasizing confidentiality and continuation of proceedings despite company winding up.
Rajiv Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against a nominee director solely for loan default, holding that without criminal proceedings, such restriction violates the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.