Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
RT Vision Technologies Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that downgrading a vendor’s status without an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and directed reconsideration of the decision with a speaking order while keeping the impugned order in abeyance.
M/S HARI ENTERPRISES v. SUPERINTENDENT, RANGE 25, CGST, MODEL TOWN DIVISION
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after the petitioner made a tax deposit post-cancellation.
M/S ROSMERTA HSRP VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court set aside retrospective cancellation of GST registration for lack of objective reasons and procedural fairness, restoring registration and directing compliance.
Sethia Enterprises v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity of personal hearing.
Madhur Computech Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Affordable Exports Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a lease agreement's arbitration clause constituted a valid arbitration agreement with New Delhi as the seat, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, overruling the respondents' jurisdictional objections.
Kalpatru Industries v. The Commissioner SGST Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective reasons and proper notice, setting aside retrospective cancellation from 2017 and limiting it to the date of the petitioner's cancellation application.
Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited v. Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward 203 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for failure to consider taxpayer's detailed replies and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Errol Rajesh Dysell v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a deemed private university is not a public authority under the RTI Act and that personal student information sought is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j).
Dr Jaseela Majeed v. Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University
The Delhi High Court directed the University to provide relevant documents and a personal hearing before deciding on the petitioner's employment challenge, granting interim protection pending final order.
Krishan Gopal Yadav & Ors. v. The State GNCT, Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed charges under Sections 498A/34 and 509 IPC against petitioners due to lack of prima facie material and limitation bar, emphasizing the necessity of specific allegations at the charge framing stage.
INTERLINKS OVERSEAS PVT LTD & ORS. v. SOUTH DELHI PHARMA
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal condoning a 30-day delay in entering appearance in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, setting aside the dismissal of the condonation application subject to costs.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of an independent Administrator for Shri Kalkaji Mandir's management and redevelopment, clarified the scope of the Supreme Court's status quo order, and directed compliance with Court orders amid ongoing disputes and a tragic incident at the temple.
Rashme Bahl v. Ramnik Wadehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court approved a settlement in a partition suit among siblings involving disputed mortgage and sale of inherited properties, decreeing the suit in terms of the settlement and appointing a Commissioner to facilitate sale and payment.
Kristal Vision Projects Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that delivery of an arbitral award during a virtual hearing and direction to collect physical copies satisfies Section 31(5) of the Arbitration Act, and delay in collecting the award does not extend the limitation period under Section 34(3), dismissing the petition as time-barred.
SS Rail Works Pvt Ltd v. Ircon International Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of a railway signalling tender and upheld the technical disqualification of the petitioner’s bid, emphasizing limited judicial interference in bona fide tender evaluation and administrative decisions.
Federation of Tata Communications Employees Unions v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable against Tata Communications Limited post-privatization as it ceased to be a 'State' under Article 12, dismissing the employees' writ petition on maintainability grounds.
Dinesh Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 20, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 following a search conducted after 1 April 2021 is barred by limitation if issued beyond the ten-year block period computed from the date of receipt of seized material, not the date of search.
R B Seth Jessa Ram Hospital and Bros v. Ramesh Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's imposition of costs for repeated adjournments, emphasizing that adjournments must be granted only for sufficient cause to ensure speedy justice.
Vikas Jaglan v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court held that withholding a candidate’s examination results on suspicion of unfair means requires issuance of a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing before adverse action.
George Ninan v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a Chief Financial Officer who signs a cheque on behalf of a company is prima facie liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour, dismissing the petition to quash the complaint.