Delhi High Court

49,110 judgments

Year:

Shivkumar Shankarrao Thakur & Ors. v. Shiv Biri Manufacturing Co P Ltd & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4300-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the registration of a trademark, holding that the impugned mark was not deceptively similar to the appellants' marks and upholding the Registrar's decision without imposing geographical limitations.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed trademark registration deceptive similarity prior use geographical limitation

Bilquis v. Jamia Milia Islamia

27 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging eviction and demolition orders, holding the suits barred by res judicata and lacking cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant res judicata Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC Public Premises Act 1958

Subodh Anand v. C.B.I.

27 May 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:4395

The Delhi High Court acquitted a police officer accused of bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act Section 20 PC Act presumption

MS Asandas and Sons Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4542
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the government's decision to cap incentives under the PLI Scheme for food processing and held that scheme amendments made in public interest are lawful and binding on applicants.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Production Linked Incentive Scheme Food Processing Industry CAGR cap Committed investment

Shubham Pal & Ors. v. Staff Selection Commission & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:4421-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the SSC's CGLE 2023 answer key and results, holding that courts should not interfere with expert evaluation absent manifest error or statutory provision for re-evaluation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant competitive examination answer key re-evaluation judicial review

Ranjit Singh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4505

The Delhi High Court directed fresh demarcation proceedings to resolve a boundary dispute between private landowners and forest department, allowing temporary placement of boundary pillars pending final demarcation.

property petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 land demarcation boundary dispute

Vishwas Pathak v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

27 May 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:4475

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction by a non-neighbor petitioner lacking locus standi and failing to show violation of fundamental or legal rights.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 locus standi unauthorized construction illegal construction

Samiksha Chaudhary & Ors. v. Maulana Azad Medical College & Anr.

27 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4284
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that completion of mandatory clinical postings and training duration is essential for eligibility to appear in the 3rd Professional Part II MBBS Examination, dismissing the petitioners' claim to appear earlier.

education petition_dismissed Significant MBBS Examination Clinical Posting Graduate Medical Education Regulations Training Completion Certificate

Union of India v. Tapash Basak

27 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:4301-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order remanding pay parity claims of SSB ministerial staff vis-à-vis ARC and SFF counterparts for reconsideration, dismissing the Union of India's challenge to the relief granted.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant trifurcation pay parity grade pay special allowance

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shiv Prasad Indramani; Shiv Prasad Indramani v. Mubin Ahmed

27 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's suo moto conversion of a Section 166 claim petition to Section 163-A, restricted compensation to the statutory amount of Rs. 5 lakhs without additional heads, and dismissed the claimants' appeal on negligence.

motor_vehicle_accident_compensation appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163-A Section 164

Satpal Sharma & Anr. v. Sadhna Arora

27 May 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:4296

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order based on the landlord's better title established through a family settlement admitted as collateral evidence, dismissing the tenant's challenge for lack of contest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction family settlement unregistered document

Paras Ram Dangal Society v. Estate Officer -IV DDA & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4298

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a delayed appeal under the Public Premises Act, holding that the petitioner society was an unauthorized occupant and the delay in filing the appeal was not condonable.

property petition_dismissed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 condonation of delay unauthorized occupation limitation

Tarun Kumar Goyal v. MS SB Sales Corporation

27 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4412-DB

The High Court allowed the appeal and directed the trial court to accept the appellant's timely filed written statement after curing curable defects, restoring the right to defend the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement e-filing portal statement of truth affidavit of admission and denial

Prashant Sharma v. M/S R3 Medical Clinic Pvt. Ltd.

27 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4448

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration of disputes arising from a Shareholder Agreement containing an arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause

Sundaresh Bhat v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India

27 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4546

The Delhi High Court upheld suspension of a liquidator for appointing a related party support firm with excessive fees but set aside charges related to non-refundable participation fees and valuer appointments, modifying suspension duration accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Liquidator misconduct Non-refundable participation fee Appointment of valuers

Kamlesh Jain v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.

27 May 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:4385

The Delhi High Court restrained a cafe from playing loud music beyond permissible hours and directed land authorities to frame rules for levying charges on illegal encroachments of public land.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant encroachment public land user charges noise pollution

Revati Cements Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

27 May 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:4405

Delhi High Court allowed substitution of immovable property attached under PMLA with a bank guarantee of equivalent value as an interim relief, affirming writ jurisdiction to grant such relief despite pending appeal.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Provisional Attachment Order Substitution of attached property Bank guarantee

Sachin & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4305

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Rohit Jain v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:4327

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 406 IPC, holding that quashing powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be sparingly exercised and the matter requires investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 406 IPC Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act

G L Sharma v. CPIO, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd

27 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4545

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of detailed personal information of other employees under RTI as exempt under Section 8(1)(j), affirming privacy protections against vague and clarificatory information requests.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act Section 8(1)(j) personal information Voluntary Retirement Scheme