Delhi High Court
48,761 judgments
Ambience Private Limited & Anr. v. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a bank cannot arbitrarily withdraw a One Time Settlement after full payment by the borrower and emphasized the binding nature of OTS sanction terms and the doctrine of legitimate expectation.
Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against respondent no. 1, holding that non-payment of EMIs and alleged asset disposal were not willful disobedience due to financial inability and ongoing insolvency proceedings.
Captain Deepak Kumar v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s letters patent appeal challenging the dismissal of his writ petition containing unsubstantiated and mala fide allegations, and directed local authorities to monitor his mental health under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
International Management Group (UK) Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, International Taxation, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that income earned by IMG not attributable to its Indian PE is taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA and Income Tax Act, rejecting IMG's challenge to bifurcation and the 'make available' test.
Kostub Investments Ltd. v. Reinz Talbros Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that claims of secured debenture holders in company liquidation must be adjudicated up to the date of appointment of the provisional liquidator, not the final winding up date, dismissing the petitioner's challenge.
Kamal Singh Alias Kamal Singh Rawat v. Jai Kumar Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that receipt of benefits under the Employees State Insurance Act does not bar a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act for injuries caused by a third party, allowing the appeal and remanding for fresh assessment.
Genesis Finance Service Co Limited v. Usha Bansal and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a purported tenant's belated application to obstruct auction of mortgaged properties in execution of a money decree, holding such applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC are maintainable only by decree-holders or auction purchasers.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directs domain name registrars to block infringing domain names and recognizes RBI's beneficiary name lookup facility as a key enforcement tool in trademark infringement disputes involving domain names.
NORTH EASTERN CARRYING CORPORATION LTD v. DO BEST INFOWAY
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 120-day limit for filing written statements in commercial suits and counter-claims, dismissing the petition seeking condonation of a one-day delay.
NORTH EASTERN CARRYING CORPORATION LTD v. GOYAL IMPEX AND INDUSTRIES LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 120-day limit for filing written statements in commercial suits and counter-claims, dismissing the petition seeking condonation of a one-day delay.
NORTH EASTERN CARRYING CORPORATION LTD v. HLG TRADING
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 120-day limit for filing written statements in commercial suits and counter-claims, dismissing the petition seeking condonation of a one-day delay.
Anurag Mahajan v. Tumlare Travels Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside an ex parte decree due to unexplained delay and lack of sufficient cause, affirming the dismissal of applications under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Navneet Sharma & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Mukesh Udeshi v. Jindal Steel Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that only parties to an arbitration agreement or proceedings under INDRP can challenge an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, dismissing a beneficial owner's petition for lack of locus standi.
KG Marketing India v. Rashi Santosh Soni & Anr.
The Court held that fabrication of newspaper advertisements to obtain ex-parte injunction constitutes a serious offence warranting Court-initiated proceedings under Section 340 CrPC and vacated the injunction granted to KG Marketing.
Associated Broadcasting Company Private Limited v. Sreedevi Digital Systems Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions alleging disruption of TV9 Telugu telecast, directing the dispute to be adjudicated by the TDSAT as the competent authority.
Speedacc Learning Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Satyasai Panigrahy
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of a complaint under Section 138 NI Act, holding that a director and authorized signatory is prima facie liable under Section 141 and disputed facts cannot be adjudicated at the pre-trial stage.
Sanyam Bhushan v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 NI Act on grounds of delay and laches, holding disputed factual issues must be decided by the trial court and resignation from directorship does not absolve liability.
Jitin Mittal & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Section 202 Cr.P.C. does not apply to applications under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act as these are civil proceedings, and the complaint cannot be quashed at the initial stage for lack of inquiry or jurisdiction.
M/S Books Cybertech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Satyasai Panigrahy
The Delhi High Court held that service of notice under Section 138 of the NI Act on the director who signed the cheque constitutes valid notice to the drawer company, and dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints on defective notice grounds.