Delhi High Court

48,761 judgments

Year:

SVC Cooperative Bank Ltd v. Trinity Touch Pvt Ltd

02 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4890-DB

The Delhi High Court held that unilateral renewal of credit facilities without borrower’s acceptance does not attract prepayment penalty or processing fees, dismissing the bank’s appeal and ordering refund with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant prepayment penalty credit facility renewal processing charges contractual consensus

Court on its Own Motion v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2782
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

In POCSO cases, the victim's age determined by bone age ossification test must be taken as the upper limit of the estimated range with a two-year margin of error applied, ensuring the benefit of doubt goes to the accused.

criminal other Significant POCSO Act bone age ossification test age determination margin of error

Saher Ali v. Delhi Development Authority

02 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 4156

The Delhi High Court held that slum dwellers illegally occupying Yamuna floodplain lands not notified as JJ Clusters and lacking possession prior to 2006 are not entitled to rehabilitation, affirming the State's duty to remove encroachments to protect the environment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Yamuna floodplains Delhi Development Authority DUSIB Policy rehabilitation

Sanjay Dhingra v. IDBI Bank Limited & Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4908
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the interim moratorium under IBC bars further SARFAESI Act enforcement against a personal guarantor and writ petitions challenging SARFAESI proceedings are not maintainable when alternative remedies exist before the DRT.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code interim moratorium personal guarantor

Kalpana Dudeja v. Jaideep Kumar Mishra & Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4907

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging non-compliance of promotion directions, holding that promotions must be granted as per policy and merit, and contempt jurisdiction cannot be used to challenge administrative decisions on promotions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt jurisdiction consequential benefits promotion policy reinstatement

Suman v. Commissioner of Police and Ors

02 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:4903-DB

The Delhi High Court directed production of a missing minor before the Magistrate for a supplementary statement and placement by the Child Welfare Committee, ensuring her safety and welfare.

criminal petition_allowed writ of habeas corpus minor child Section 164 Cr.P.C. Child Welfare Committee

Mohd. Tahir v. State NCT of Delhi; Umakant Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4901-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted two accused of murder due to incomplete and inconsistent circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant last seen theory circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC recovery of weapon

Amarjeet v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

02 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4900-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder based on credible dying declarations and corroborative scientific evidence despite absence of eyewitnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC murder kerosene oil

Nandu Ram v. Sohan Singh

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4853

The Delhi High Court held that legal heirs of a claimant who dies during motor accident claim proceedings are entitled to compensation for loss of estate, including medical expenses and loss of earning capacity, while claims for personal injuries abate on death unrelated to the accident.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of estate personal injury claim legal representatives

Atmastco Ltd v. Mandeep Kalra

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4830
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes over unpaid legal fees for professional services rendered by advocates do not constitute commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and thus are maintainable in regular civil courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) legal fees recovery professional services

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Ashok Kumar Kochhar & Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4807
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation in a motor accident death case where the surviving husband was financially independent, applying the principle that loss to estate, not loss of dependency, should be compensated.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of dependency loss to estate compensation calculation

Jayesh Kumar Jain v. Dugra Dutt Rai & Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4841

The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal due to the claimant's failure to prove rash and negligent driving and unexplained delays in disclosing vehicle details.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 claim FIR delay rash and negligent driving

Rajni Khanna v. Sidharthan

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4808

The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and set aside the Trial Court's order, rejecting the plaint for failing to disclose a cause of action due to bald allegations of mental incapacity without material facts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action rejection of plaint gift deed

Manav Mandir Mission Trust v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4839

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularisation of a religious trust's possession on Yamuna flood plain land, holding that clear title or adverse possession must be established against government land and that acquisition proceedings upheld by the Supreme Court prevail over administrative regularisation claims.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition regularisation Zonal Development Plan river flood plain

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. D K Jain

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4840
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partly modified the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by reassessing disability and enhancing certain heads, while upholding interest at 10% per annum on delayed payment.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability loss of earning capacity compensation quantum

Baby Anusha Mittal thr Mother Pratibha Mittal v. Suraj Prakash & Ors

02 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4850
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals against dismissal of motor accident claims, applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and remanding for fresh consideration including examination of the driver to determine negligence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 140 res ipsa loquitur

The Deputy Commissioner of Police v. Score Information Technologies Ltd

02 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4891-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting damages for 40% of equipment cost under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration and validating compensation in lieu of specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 21 Specific Relief Act Contract interpretation Patent illegality

State Bank of India v. Ramesh Kumar Naroola & Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4892

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Trial Court to reconsider whether State Bank of India is a necessary party in a suit concerning unauthorized credit card transactions issued by its subsidiary, emphasizing the need to examine contractual and corporate relationships.

civil other Significant necessary party proper party Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order I Rule 10 CPC

Sachin Solanki v. Union of India

02 Jul 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:4922

The Delhi High Court upheld DGCA's rejection of exemption requests for issuance of Commercial Pilot License, holding that DGCA lacks power under Rule 160 of Aircraft Rules, 1937 to grant exemptions and the petitioner failed to meet all statutory requirements.

administrative petition_dismissed Commercial Pilot License Aircraft Rules 1937 Rule 160 exemption Directorate General of Civil Aviation

Vesuvius India Limited v. Steel Authority of India Limited & Anr

02 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4993

The Delhi High Court held that business restrictions imposed on Vesuvius India Limited by SAIL amounted to blacklisting without due process, quashing the order for violating natural justice and Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant blacklisting banning guidelines natural justice show cause notice