Navneet Sharma & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 02 Jul 2024 · 2024:DHC:4898
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 4935/2024
2024:DHC:4898
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4935/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 02.07.2024
CRL.M.C. 4935/2024
NAVNEET SHARMA & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Petitioners-in-person
WITH
counsel.
VERSUS
THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI)
& ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State
WITH
ASI Brijesh Kumar, PS: Mandawli Fazal Pur.
Mr. V. K. Sharma, Advocate for R-2
WITH
Respondent No. 2 in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 18879/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0089/2020, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, registered at P.S.: Mandawli Fazal Pur and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 appear on advance notice and accept notice

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 18.02.2014. No child was born out of the wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 21.03.2020.

4. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Deed dated 24.06.2023. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 20.02.2024.

5. Balance amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- has been paid to respondent No. 2 today through DD No. 031580 dated 27.06.2024 drawn on The Janata Co-operative Bank Ltd., East Krishna Nagar, Delhi Branch in favour of respondent No. 2.

6. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by ASI Brijesh Kumar, PS: Mandawli Fazal Pur. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0089/2020, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, registered at P.S.: Mandawli Fazal Pur and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. JULY 02, 2024