Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Deepak Sinha v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to analyze electro-homeopathic formulations, holding that recognition of new medical systems is a policy matter beyond judicial interference and the laboratory's statutory functions do not extend to such analysis.
A T Kearney Consulting India Pvt Ltd v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a consultancy agreement where parties failed to agree on the arbitrator.
Umakant Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed a Section 482 CrPC application to correct a judgment by adding the name of an advocate who appeared for the appellant but was omitted from the original judgment.
Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of non-notified parties from arbitration proceedings, holding that arbitration cannot be initiated against parties not served with mandatory Section 21 notice or included in the Section 11 petition.
Praduman Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF transfer policy guidelines are not mandatory and upheld the administrative transfer of a Head Constable despite his claim for home sector posting based on tenure and personal grounds.
Kamlesh Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF transfer guidelines are only broad parameters and do not confer a vested right, dismissing the petition challenging the transfer of a Head Constable to an out of home sector posting.
Ravi Setia & Anr. v. Som Nath Setia & Ors.
The High Court held that parties cannot be barred from cross-examining on documents declared null and void in a prior suit pending appeal, and objections to admissibility should be decided at final arguments.
Samiksha Chaudhary & Anr. v. Maulana Azad Medical College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of MBBS students who were denied eligibility to appear in the 3rd Professional Part II Examination due to incomplete clinical training as mandated by the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997.
Nayan India Science and Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Tushar Maurya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking a mandatory injunction directing a former employee to transfer knowledge post-termination, holding that specific performance of personal service contracts is barred under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
M/S SHIVOY ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI NORTH AND ORS
The Delhi High Court directed verification of the petitioner’s additional place of business and restoration of GST registration if found operational, emphasizing that cancellation solely for non-existence at the principal place is unjustified.
Neeraj Dengre @ Neeraj Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery due to failure to cooperate with investigation despite initial compliance.
Dr Utkarsh Pathak v. Dr Sreenivas Madireddy
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the suit could not be summarily rejected.
Jyoti Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of serious fraud and forgery due to failure to cooperate with investigation despite notices under Section 41A CrPC.
M/S SHRI SAI METALS v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX WEST DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the GST authorities to decide the petitioner's application for cancellation of GST registration within 30 days, clarifying that cancellation does not absolve prior tax liabilities.
Kanchaman Yonjan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused under the NDPS Act despite recovery of commercial quantity of narcotics, emphasizing delay in trial, procedural safeguards under Section 50, and absence of independent witnesses as grounds overriding statutory bail embargo.
Olive Traders v. The Commissioner, CGST and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for lack of independent verification and fair opportunity, directing the petitioner be allowed to respond to the Show Cause Notice on merits.
Sukhvinder Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to absence of independent witnesses and prolonged trial delay, emphasizing that procedural irregularities do not automatically justify bail but trial delay can override statutory bail restrictions.
Sovraj v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act, emphasizing that procedural irregularities in sampling and absence of independent witnesses, coupled with prolonged trial delay, justify bail despite stringent statutory conditions.
Madhuri Chauhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the impact of procedural irregularities and prolonged trial delay on the right to liberty despite statutory bail restrictions.
Jasbir Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements under Section 67 NDPS Act are inadmissible without corroboration and that delay in trial justifies bail despite the bar under Section 37.