Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Manik Aggarwal and Anr. v. Canara Bank and Ors.

09 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5102
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that banks must provide borrowers a fair hearing before classifying their accounts as fraud under RBI Master Directions, setting aside the impugned fraud classification for non-compliance with natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant audi alteram partem natural justice fraud classification Master Directions on Frauds

Parikshit Mahipal v. The Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee & Anr

09 Jul 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:5099-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of a lawyer's chamber allotment application due to insufficient documentary proof of continuous practice at Rohini District Courts.

administrative appeal_dismissed Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee chamber allotment continuous practice Vakalatnama

Ex Const. Damodar Singh v. Union of India

09 Jul 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:5075-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of an ex-BSF constable, holding that pension granted under a now-invalid circular can be discontinued if the petitioner does not meet the qualifying service criteria or fall within the Supreme Court's exception.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pensionary benefits voluntary discharge Border Security Force CCS (Pension) Rules

ALIG AND ASSOCIATES & ANR. v. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ANR.

09 Jul 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:5098-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the cancellation and reissuance of a Chartered Accountant's certificate of practice due to non-payment of renewal fees, holding that a temporary lapse does not erase prior seniority.

administrative appeal_dismissed certificate of practice membership renewal Institute of Chartered Accountants of India seniority

M/S Yadav Labour Contractor v. GAIL (India) Limited & Anr.

09 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5092
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a six-month banning order against a bidder for conflict of interest and misrepresentation in tendering, emphasizing limited judicial interference in bona fide administrative decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant conflict of interest tender conditions banning order misrepresentation

Union of India v. Rakesh K Gupta

09 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5094

The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's order directing disclosure of vigilance complaint information related to the applicant while protecting third-party privacy under the RTI Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(e) Section 8(1)(h) Section 8(1)(j)

Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5096

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of occupants challenging eviction from Khyber Pass Hostel, holding they are unauthorized occupants not entitled to protection or rehabilitation under the PP Act or DUSIB policy without lawful induction or cluster notification.

property appeal_dismissed Significant unauthorized occupation public premises eviction DUSIB Act rehabilitation and relocation

Eagle Hunter Solutions Ltd v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr

09 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5097
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging forfeiture of tender deposits due to false affidavits, holding that review jurisdiction is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the case.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 1 CPC forfeiture of earnest money deposit tender eligibility criteria

Reena Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

09 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5068-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition under Article 226 directing restoration of minor children to the mother’s custody with conditions ensuring welfare and reasonable access to the father, pending further custody proceedings.

family petition_allowed Significant Habeas Corpus custody of minor children Article 226 Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Nasreen Mohsin Choudhary v. National Investigation Agency

09 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5070-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Section 21 of the NIA Act is maintainable against attachment of property of a proclaimed offender, but a non-accused joint owner cannot be allowed to reside in the attached property, upholding the attachment and staying sale.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant National Investigation Agency Act Section 21 NIA Act attachment of property proclaimed offender

Vinod v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

09 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5065-DB

The Delhi High Court ruled that police must immediately register FIRs and commence investigation in missing children cases without any 24-hour waiting period, emphasizing urgent action to protect minors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant missing child Habeas Corpus FIR registration 24-hour waiting period

Pranshul Garg v. Harish Mittal

09 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5067

The High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s pending interlocutory applications under Order XXXIX CPC and declined to decide them itself under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC interlocutory applications

Gurvinder Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi & Anr

09 Jul 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5035

The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board's mechanical rejection of a life convict's premature release application for failure to consider all relevant factors and directed reconsideration in accordance with applicable policy and rules.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant premature release Sentence Review Board life imprisonment Section 433A CrPC

Chandan Yadav v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr.

09 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5066

The High Court held that a suit restraining electricity disconnection cannot be dismissed for non-deposit of charges when supply is not restored and the petitioner does not seek restoration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant electricity supply mutual obligation deposit order permanent injunction

MODI PAINTS AND VARNISH WORKS v. SANJAY GUPTA AND ANR.

09 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:5061

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition for removal of the trademark 'MODI CRYL' as the trademark had ceased to subsist due to non-renewal beyond its expiry date under Section 25(3) of the Trademarks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Trademark renewal Section 25(3) Trademarks Act 1999 Trademark removal Rectification petition

Somender Yadav v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

09 Jul 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:5059

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief reinstating students removed for nonpayment of unapproved fee hikes, emphasizing the necessity of DOE approval for fee increases and protecting students' academic interests pending final adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fee hike school fees Directorate of Education approval student reinstatement

Baby Krutika Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

09 Jul 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:5058

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing a child admitted under the EWS category to continue studying despite a dispute between the school and the Directorate of Education, upholding her fundamental right to education under Article 21A.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Right to Education Article 21A EWS category Interim relief

Mukesh Khurana v. Rahul Chaudhary

09 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5054

The Delhi High Court held that a verbal tenancy agreement replacing an expired written lease extinguishes the original arbitration clause, and thus no valid arbitration agreement existed to refer the dispute to arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement lease agreement oral tenancy extension of lease

Nishesh Ranjan & Anr. v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr.

09 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:5032
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in interdependent agreements apply collectively, directing disputes under a tripartite housing loan and sale agreement to arbitration despite the absence of an arbitration clause in the tripartite agreement.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration clause composite transaction interconnected agreements tripartite agreement

Amit Sharma v. Sugandha Sharma

09 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5017-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking interim custody of his son, emphasizing the child's best interest and discomfort with the appellant, and upheld supervised visitation rights.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim custody guardianship petition visitation rights best interest of the child