Delhi High Court
29,282 judgments
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. RADHABEN J ZALA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a sole arbitrator upon prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny at this stage.
State v. Nadeem & Anr
The High Court upheld the acquittal under Section 308 IPC, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the need for conclusive proof of injuries and intent, and dismissed the State's appeal.
Waman Mahendra Navnath v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate honourably acquitted of criminal charges is entitled to be considered suitable for CISF employment, quashing the rejection based on MHA guidelines that do not apply to acquittals on merits.
M/S UGRO CAPITAL LIMITED & ANR. v. M/S MOBILE PLUS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a business loan Facility Agreement containing a valid arbitration clause.
Avik Sanyal v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 30 of the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere possession of a live cartridge without conscious knowledge does not constitute an offence.
Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Bansal Tex Fab Pvt Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without examining arbitrability or merits.
NLB Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Aaga Commercial Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Panaesha Education Society v. Sh. Varun Goenka & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon parties' mutual consent, reserving rights including counterclaims, to resolve disputes under a lease agreement.
M/S ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LTD v. MORESTEP PATHLABS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
GLOCAL THINKERS PVT LTD v. INSTRUMENTATION AUTOMATION SURVEILLANCE COMMUNICATION SECTOR SKILL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd v. Bhoruka Classic Finance Private Limited and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause in the principal Loan Agreement governs disputes under both the Loan Agreement and the Deed of Guarantee forming a single composite transaction, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Bhosale Akash Gajanan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging disqualification from CISF recruitment due to defective colour vision, upholding medical board findings conducted per prescribed standards.
Union of India & Ors. v. Dr. Anil Kumar Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a disciplinary penalty imposed on a government officer for procurement irregularities, holding that the penalty was based on no evidence and a non-speaking order ignoring inquiry findings.
Sharmila v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal’s order and Show Cause Notice, holding that prolonged unauthorized absence may be treated as deemed resignation under CCS Leave Rules, and departmental procedures must be followed before rejoining.
Union of India & Anr. v. Kavya Roy Choudhury; 672596 EX HFL Ratan Lal Mahato
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, emphasizing the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction and rejecting nonspeaking medical board reasons.
Gurvinder Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Sangeeta @ Sanyogita v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.
Naresh Sukhdev Sindhe v. Seema Baweja & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a civil suit dismissed for default where the plaintiff showed sufficient cause due to simultaneous penal proceedings and bona fide conduct, and condoned delay in filing restoration application.
Rajender Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction for lack of locus standi and abuse of process, emphasizing that only persons directly affected may invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Divisional Railway Manager v. Kanchan Tiwari
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act accrues only until the date of deposit, but interest from the date of accident can be awarded under discretionary powers to do complete justice.