Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Faizan & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 290 and 106(1) BNS based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Nikhil Lahri v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/304A IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a rash and negligent driving death case, affirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Saluja v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under IPC sections 506, 509, 354, and 34 based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Vakeel Ahmed v. Kamlesh Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the judgment debtor's petition challenging execution orders for possession and arrest warrants, holding that unproven claims of possession restoration cannot delay decree enforcement.
State (Government of NCT, Delhi) v. Vikas Tomar
The Delhi High Court set aside anticipatory bail granted in a murder case involving organized crime, emphasizing that bail courts must not prematurely assess evidence or curtail essential investigative steps.
Tarzan alias Sahil Mathur v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused under NDPS Act, holding that substantial compliance with procedural safeguards and the presence of a strong prima facie case with criminal antecedents justified denial of bail despite small quantity of narcotics recovered.
Rajneesh Kumar Pandey v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a large-scale railway job fraud case, emphasizing the gravity of offences, the petitioner’s alleged mastermind role, and risk to trial despite co-accused’s bail and prolonged custody.
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that the prosecution failed to prove both demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt.
Hari Kishan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to verify and consider the petitioner's regularization application expeditiously and restrained demolition pending its disposal, granting interim protection to the petitioner.
Dr. Sunil Singhal v. Kaluram Rastogi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that maintainability objections not raised before the Rent Controller cannot be entertained in revision and procedural defects are curable.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Rajesh Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused due to contradictions in prosecution evidence, unexplained delay in FIR, and lack of reliable identification.
Radhey Shayam Chouhan v. Geeta Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the tenant based on a final partition decree establishing landlord's ownership and limited revisional interference in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Radhey Shyam Chouhan v. Radha Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant who failed to raise triable issues and was bound by a final partition decree establishing the landlords' ownership under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Atul Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the demolition order for unauthorized construction, directing the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal MCD and restraining demolition pending appeal, emphasizing strict compliance with Supreme Court procedural safeguards.
Arjun Singh Rawat v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mahesh Kumar and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Ashok Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 51 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone and enhanced the fine.
Tarun Sawhney v. Uma Lall & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a decree for specific performance of property sale agreements due to the Plaintiff's failure to perform within the agreed 12-month termination period and held that the agreements stood automatically terminated.
Vinod Kumar Manaktala v. Vipin Kumar Manaktala
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to reject a plaint challenging a family settlement and compromise decree, holding that a non-party to the compromise can maintain a separate suit alleging fraud and that such issues require trial.
Shikha Kumari v. Ravikant Ravi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on ground of mental cruelty due to non-consummation and refusal to cohabit, dismissing the wife's appeal.