Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Bagri & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Sh. Balbir v. The State Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Manjeet Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Uzair Khan v. Nike Innovate CV & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal with directions for the appellant to furnish an undertaking against trademark infringement, while ensuring ongoing suit and contempt proceedings continue unaffected.
Saijee Developers (P) Ltd. v. Mr. Inderjeet Khanduja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants access to the suit property for independent valuation, balancing procedural fairness by permitting the plaintiff to respond to new valuation evidence.
Vijay Singh Dogra v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim relief to travel abroad during an ongoing SFIO investigation, holding that travel restrictions are justified to protect the investigation and economic interests despite the petitioner’s fundamental right to travel.
Dr. Kumud Sharma & Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that reimbursement under the ESIC scheme is not available for non-emergency surgeries undertaken without referral from an ESIC hospital.
Nadeem v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of conspiracy and aiding in a murder, considering his limited role, compliance with interim bail, and the trial stage.
M/S BKB TRANSPORT P LIMITED v. NTPC LTD
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under the contract agreements and that pre-arbitration reference to an Expert Settlement Council is optional, allowing the petitioner to proceed with arbitration.
Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience by respondents in proceeding with a sexual harassment inquiry, holding that acting on a bona fide interpretation of court orders precludes contempt.
Anil Kumar Hajelay & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified its earlier order to require comprehensive administrative and financial sanctions and directed the GNCTD to float a comprehensive tender for hybrid courts infrastructure across all 691 courts, rejecting phased tendering limited to pilot courts.
Nandita v. National Testing Agency and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the NEET-UG 2024 answer key, holding that judicial interference is limited to cases where the answer key is demonstrably wrong and upholding the presumption of correctness of expert-verified answer keys.
INSPR (MIN) Vijay Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing notional pay fixation at par with juniors for BSF Assistant Sub Inspectors granted retrospective seniority, limiting arrears due to delay in filing.
Sharma Enterprises v. The Banking Ombudsman & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Banking Ombudsman's order on the ground of petitioner’s breach of contract and lack of clean hands, affirming the limited jurisdiction of the Ombudsman and discretionary nature of writ relief.
Ms. Mishika Pandita and Mr. Mohd. Changez Ali Khan v. Sumit Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing appointment of a candidate declared medically fit initially, holding that a delayed second medical examination without valid reasons is unjustified.
Seeta Shah v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declined to direct RBI to frame guidelines on Corporate Guarantees and held that disputes over guarantee liability limits fall within NCLT's jurisdiction in insolvency proceedings.
Hari Chand & Ors. v. Vijay Rani
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order and allowed delayed written statement filing with costs, emphasizing adjudication on merits under Article 227.
BDR Builders and Developers Private Limited v. Sh Shrichand Bijlani
The High Court directed the trial court to consider all Local Commissioner reports and objections, allow fresh objections, and pass an appropriate order, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Ramesh Chawla (HUF) v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 45(1), New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to pass a fresh assessment order within the statutory limitation period bars reassessment and entitles the assessee to refund of excess tax paid, setting aside belated notices issued beyond limitation.
Ashutosh Sharma v. Income Tax Office
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing release of the Fixed Deposit Receipt deposited as a condition for rescinding the Look Out Circular against the petitioner, holding that no fresh LOC exists and the FDR should not be retained indefinitely.