Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Arun Kumar and Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed that the petitioners' service conditions shall remain unchanged and their services not terminated during the pendency of their industrial dispute under Section 33(1)(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Mohammad Fahad v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act following amicable settlement of civil liability, emphasizing the use of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in offences with predominant civil elements.
SH NAVED KHAN v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 420 IPC on amicable settlement grounds, emphasizing inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in predominantly civil disputes.
Yeshpal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to decide the petitioners' representations for retrospective promotion benefits within six weeks, enforcing compliance with its earlier judicial directions on service rule amendments.
Ravi Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Umesh Alias Sonu & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Roshan @ Raushan Kumar v. State Through SHO PS Dwarka North
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Devi Singh & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a property dispute under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process in cases with a predominant civil element.
Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest writ petition challenging commercial share transactions regulated and investigated by IRDAI, SEBI, and RBI, emphasizing judicial restraint and non-interference in regulated commercial matters.
Saumya Das & Ors. v. Indira Gandhi National Open University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging IGNOU's notifications on readmission and credit transfer policies, holding that delay and laches barred judicial review despite merits favoring appellants.
Vipin Kumar Saluja v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the major punishment imposed on a prisoner for misconduct, holding that procedural fairness was observed and denial of furlough did not amount to double punishment.
Rakesh Arora v. Adharv Enterprises
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's appeal upholding the order to inventory and transfer liquor stock from sealed premises, with the Supreme Court affirming non-interference in related landlord proceedings.
Neeru Kapoor v. Blue State Infotech Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to add a prayer for possession after trial commencement, holding that procedural rules should not bar substantive justice when due diligence is shown.
Mr. Sandip Vinodkumar Patel & Ors. v. STCI Finance Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act against independent, non-executive directors, holding they cannot be held vicariously liable without specific pleadings showing responsibility for the company’s business.
M/S Star Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi GST and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without reasons is impermissible and modified the cancellation order to be effective prospectively from the date of the Show Cause Notice.
MS SIERRA APPLIANCES PVT. LTD. v. MS STELLAR CONSTELLATION PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to continue arbitral proceedings after the death of the original arbitrator.
M/S SHREE SHYAM ENTERPRISES v. INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY
The Delhi High Court granted a one-month extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, treating the mandate as continuing since its expiry.
M/S GRIM TECH PROJECTS (I) PVT. LTD v. INDURE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition for appointment of arbitrator as premature for non-compliance with mandatory pre-arbitral dispute resolution steps under the contract.
SCOPE PROMOTERS P. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside an unreasoned GST registration cancellation order and directed restoration of registration, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders and procedural fairness under the CGST Act.
Union of India v. M/S Parishudh Machines Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding compensation to a contractor despite delay, holding that multiple extensions and policy changes negated time being of essence and limiting judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.