Delhi High Court
29,282 judgments
Dr. Sunil Singhal v. Kaluram Rastogi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that maintainability objections not raised before the Rent Controller cannot be entertained in revision and procedural defects are curable.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Rajesh Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused due to contradictions in prosecution evidence, unexplained delay in FIR, and lack of reliable identification.
Radhey Shayam Chouhan v. Geeta Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the tenant based on a final partition decree establishing landlord's ownership and limited revisional interference in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Radhey Shyam Chouhan v. Radha Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant who failed to raise triable issues and was bound by a final partition decree establishing the landlords' ownership under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Atul Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the demolition order for unauthorized construction, directing the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal MCD and restraining demolition pending appeal, emphasizing strict compliance with Supreme Court procedural safeguards.
Arjun Singh Rawat v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mahesh Kumar and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Ashok Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 51 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone and enhanced the fine.
Tarun Sawhney v. Uma Lall & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a decree for specific performance of property sale agreements due to the Plaintiff's failure to perform within the agreed 12-month termination period and held that the agreements stood automatically terminated.
Vinod Kumar Manaktala v. Vipin Kumar Manaktala
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to reject a plaint challenging a family settlement and compromise decree, holding that a non-party to the compromise can maintain a separate suit alleging fraud and that such issues require trial.
Shikha Kumari v. Ravikant Ravi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on ground of mental cruelty due to non-consummation and refusal to cohabit, dismissing the wife's appeal.
Sanjay Gupta v. Sonakshi Gupta and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of the application to reject a plaint seeking partition of HUF properties, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and was not barred by a prior compromise decree to which the plaintiff was not a party.
Karval Batra v. Pawan Kumar Rastogi
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order allowing a co-owner landlord's petition, holding that irrelevant observations in the order do not vitiate it and that eviction petitions by one co-owner are maintainable.
Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise v. M/S Nexus Alliance Advertising and Marketing Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that incentives received by an advertising agency from media houses upon achieving revenue targets do not constitute taxable declared services under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Ruby Bansal v. C.G.S.T. Delhi East Commissioner & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition permitting condonation of delay in filing appeal against retrospective GST registration cancellation, emphasizing the need to consider unintended consequences and granting a hearing on merits.
Asha Rani v. State Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate appointment under a revised scheme, holding that the scheme applies prospectively and the petitioner’s case did not qualify for retrospective consideration.
Renu Chowdry & Ors. v. Vivek Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs to file additional documents at a late stage in a partition suit challenging a Will, emphasizing the court's discretion to admit relevant evidence to ensure complete adjudication without causing prejudice.
Ashish Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving commercial transaction offences on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, while imposing costs on the petitioners.
Shuhham Satish Chandra Tripathi v. Vikrant Malik
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement in a partnership dispute, limiting its inquiry to existence and leaving validity and arbitrability to the tribunal.
MYPREFERRED TRANSFORMATION AND HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. SUBIN JOSEPH
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.