Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Rahul Gupta @ Ganja v. State of NCT Delhi

08 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11058
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a robbery case considering prolonged incarceration, non-identification in TIP, parity with co-accused, and stage of trial despite serious allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 robbery Section 379 IPC

United India Insurance Company Ltd v. Badal

08 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:11100
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award, rejecting insurer’s plea of contributory negligence and affirming compensation based on claimant’s residence and wages in Delhi.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence contributory negligence chargesheet

Tarique R Siddiqui v. Union of India

08 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11075-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re-approach after disciplinary proceedings conclude, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.

administrative appeal_allowed writ petition withdrawal of petition liberty to re-approach disciplinary proceedings

Sgt Ankit Kumar v. Union of India

08 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11076-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the case accordingly.

other petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Rohit v. Indian Coast Guard

08 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11078-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a medical examination of the petitioner suffering from hemorrhoids to determine fitness for candidature before considering his application.

administrative petition_allowed medical fitness hemorrhoids Army Research and Referral Hospital candidature

State (Through Chief of the Air Staff) v. Mansi Aggarwal

08 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11062-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Armed Forces Tribunal to decide a long-pending case within six months, respecting the Tribunal's procedural autonomy amid multiple recusals and allowing transfer to Bombay Bench only with the respondent's consent.

administrative other Significant Armed Forces Tribunal judicial recusal bench constitution procedural autonomy

Manoj Kumar v. Union of India

08 Dec 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11095-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of the petitioner's appointment due to correction of evaluation errors discovered shortly after recruitment, emphasizing the necessity to maintain merit and fairness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant appointment cancellation recruitment error evaluation mistake merit list correction

Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Sub Asok M S

08 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11079-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition, upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension based on established precedents and medical findings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Fahad Ahmed Siddiqui v. Mahesh Kumar & Anr

08 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:11168

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing functional disability, applying future prospects, increasing non-pecuniary damages, and remanding for future medical expenses related to prosthetic limb replacement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability loss of future earnings future prospects

Gorakh v. Naresh Kumar

08 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan

The Delhi High Court modified the motor accident compensation award by applying the Raj Kumar test for loss of earning capacity, granting future prospects to the claimant, enhancing non-pecuniary damages, and remanding recovery rights issues against the driver and owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of earning capacity permanent disability future prospects non-pecuniary damages

Logix Technopark Pvt Ltd v. ATS Heights Pvt Ltd

08 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:11212

The Delhi High Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot be initiated or continued during the moratorium period under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, dismissing petitions for appointment of arbitrator and interim relief.

arbitration_and_insolvency petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 14 moratorium CIRP

Z.S. Sagar v. UOI & Anr.

08 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11083-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 158

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary penalty against a CISF officer for examination misconduct, affirming limited judicial review in departmental enquiries involving disciplined forces.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry judicial review Article 226 paramilitary forces

Malkit Singh v. Jarnail Singh

08 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11107

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that refusal to accept summons amounts to proper service and unexplained delay in filing the application to set aside the decree is not excusable.

civil appeal_dismissed ex-parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons refusal to accept summons

M/S S.A. BUILDERS LTD. v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

06 Dec 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:11992
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court held that in execution of an arbitral award with partial payments, amounts must be appropriated first towards interest and then principal, rejecting the judgment debtor’s contrary approach, and allowed payment of the balance in installments considering financial hardship.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award enforcement appropriation of payments interest and principal Order XXI Rule 1 CPC

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. SAGAR KHERA

06 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:11052

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying a 40% addition for future prospects, increasing functional disability to 80%, and raising non-pecuniary damages based on updated medical evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects functional disability non-pecuniary damages

Keshar v. Sandeep Lakra

06 Dec 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:10979

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte arbitral award for lack of proper notice under Section 21 and held that a fraudulent Agreement to Sell invalidated the arbitration clause, rendering the award unsustainable.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 21 notice Section 34 challenge ex parte arbitral award

Canara Bank v. M/s Karishma Enterprises & Ors.

06 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10911-DB

The court upheld the lawful classification of accounts as NPA and validated the sale of mortgaged property with borrower’s consent, diluting strict procedural compliance under the SARFAESI Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Non-Performing Asset SARFAESI Act Banking Regulation Act 90-day classification

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd v. Mahesh Prasad & Ors

06 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10993
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that for a self-employed deceased below 40 years, future prospects in motor accident claims should be enhanced by 40%, not 50%, and directed recomputation of compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant future prospects loss of dependency motor accident claim self-employed deceased

Lalita Gupta & Ors. v. Manoj Kumar Rana & Ors.

06 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10971
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by holding that the latest income tax return is the proper basis for assessing deceased's income and that non-pecuniary damages must be awarded to all entitled dependants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency income tax return future prospects

Mohd. Sahil and Others v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

06 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10957

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement