Delhi High Court

29,282 judgments

Year:

Major Anish Muralidhar v. Brig Ganpathy Raja Ram

10 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of broad-banding pension relief to the respondent, limiting its applicability prospectively from the Supreme Court's Ram Avtar judgment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant broad-banding pension benefits armed forces tribunal prospective relief

Residents Welfare Association v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

10 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:11231

The Delhi High Court held that security gates installed within a residential colony require MCD permission and stayed demolition pending administrative consideration of the petitioner’s representation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant security gates MLA Local Area Development Scheme Municipal Corporation of Delhi permission for gate installation

Darshan Mohar v. State of NCT of Delhi

10 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11150
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, affirming the applicability of statutory presumptions and the sufficiency of the victim's credible testimony despite absence of DNA evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault minor victim statutory presumption

Sarfaraz Ahmad & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

10 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11143

The Delhi High Court quashed three FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Sandeep Kumar Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi

10 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11123

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 419 and 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Zuber Ali alias Mohd Zuber & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

10 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11120

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11163

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

D. K. Jain v. C. S. Agarwal

10 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11098-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Agreements to Sell accompanied by delivery of possession attract stamp duty under Article 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, requiring payment of 90% of conveyance duty at the agreement stage, and upheld the Collector's orders imposing stamp duty and penalty.

property appeal_allowed Significant Article 23A Indian Stamp Act Section 53A Transfer of Property Act stamp duty liability agreement to sell

Rahul v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

10 Dec 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11146

The High Court set aside the Trial Court's contradictory charge framing under Section 397 IPC and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after proper sanction and evidence, while condoning delay in filing the revision petition.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 397 IPC deadly weapon criminal conspiracy Section 39 Arms Act sanction

Sandeep Jha @ Sandy v. State of NCT of Delhi

10 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11174

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape under Section 376 IPC due to lack of corroborative evidence and the prosecutrix's knowledge of his prior marriage, granting the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC rape consent promise of marriage

Parwez Khan v. Shabnam Ara

10 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 110 (2004) DLT 546
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order for wife and minor child under Section 125 Cr.P.C., modifying only the child’s maintenance amount, affirming the husband’s statutory duty despite his other financial obligations.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. interim maintenance family resource cake maintenance liability

Mohd. Abbas v. State (CBI)

10 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11165

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant for failure of the prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act demand and acceptance of bribe

Anil Mithas v. State (NCT of Delhi)

10 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11126

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a former director accused of economic offences involving diversion of homebuyers’ funds, holding that custodial interrogation is necessary for effective investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail economic offences misappropriation of funds corporate fraud

Shantanu Prakash v. CBI & Ors.

10 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11111

The Delhi High Court held that an accused cannot compel production of documents under Section 91 Cr.P.C. during investigation before charge sheet filing, dismissing the petition as premature.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 91 CrPC production of documents investigation stage Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

BULL VALUE INCORPORATED VCC SUB-FUND v. DELPHI WORLD MONEY LTD

10 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11161

The Delhi High Court set aside a transfer order of a commercial suit on grounds of alleged judicial bias, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and established guidelines before transferring cases under Section 24 CPC.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 24 CPC transfer of suit judicial bias natural justice

Raghvendra Singh v. Union Public Service Commission

10 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11105-DB
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of OBC-NCL candidates' candidature solely for submitting certificates outside a rigid cut-off period is arbitrary and violative of constitutional principles, directing provisional consideration and verification of such candidates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant OBC-NCL certificate cut-off period CAPF Examination Rules reservation

Chillies Exporters Association India v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade & Anr.

10 Dec 2025 · The Chief Justice; Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra K... · 2025:DHC:11124-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Central Government lacks power to issue retrospective notifications under the FTDR Act, invalidating the retrospective withdrawal of export incentives under the TMA Scheme and allowing claims for exports made after the Scheme's prospective notification.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 retrospective legislation delegated legislation legitimate expectation

GP Capt Tarun Saha v. Director General Border Security Force

10 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:11097-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The court held that an officer on deputation can apply for permanent absorption to a higher post if recruitment rules permit, and rejected the review petition challenging this principle.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deputation absorption permanent absorption recruitment rules

Ashan Ur-Rab and Ors. v. CEPI and Anr

10 Dec 2025 · The Chief Justice; Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra K... · 2025:DHC:11110-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the vesting of a disputed property in the Custodian of Enemy Property under the Enemy Property Act, 1968, dismissing the petitioners' delayed challenge and rejecting their claim of valid transfer and ownership.

property petition_dismissed Significant Enemy Property Act, 1968 vesting of enemy property Custodian of Enemy Property Defence of India Rules, 1962

Jangli v. The State

10 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11092

The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of a Letter of Administration obtained by concealment and misrepresentation, affirming the rights of the true heirs and purchasers over the disputed land.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Letter of Administration Indian Succession Act Concealment of facts Non-joinder of parties