Delhi High Court
46,428 judgments
Usha Jain & Anr. v. M/S Vigneshwara Developwell Pvt Ltd
The High Court held that creditors must claim dues through the Official Liquidator in winding-up proceedings and cannot claim preferential payment of amounts deposited in earlier petitions.
BVM Engineering Industries Limited v. Imperia Heights Private Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from redevelopment agreements, directing the arbitrator to encourage settlement before adjudication.
Sonam Agarwal v. DCM Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that objections of non-joinder of parties do not bar arbitration where an arbitration agreement exists.
Mohd. Khalid v. Hindustan Construction Company Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 11 arbitration petition for lack of jurisdiction, holding that only courts at the agreed seat of arbitration, Mumbai, can entertain such petitions.
M/S Shivansh Manpower and Security v. M/S Yuantai International Supply Chain Management Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a manpower services agreement, affirming the binding nature of the arbitration clause.
Jaipal Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a delayed construction contract with DDA, affirming the validity and enforceability of the arbitration clause.
M/S. GANESHA ECOSPHERE LTD v. M/S. SVP INDUSTRIES LTD
Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause specifying Delhi as the seat confers exclusive jurisdiction, appointed a sole arbitrator, and rejected contrary jurisdictional objections based on invoices and cause of action.
Sandeep Hooda v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act is not available where the appellant failed to construct a residential house with basic amenities within the prescribed period.
Ms. S v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that bail should not be cancelled without supervening circumstances affecting a fair trial and that the complainant had notice of the bail hearing.
Sanjay Aggarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's cognizance of a PMLA offence upon the ED's complaint filed during ongoing investigation, affirming the retrospective applicability of Explanation-II to Section 44(1)(b) allowing supplementary complaints.
IN-TIME GARMENTS PVT LTD v. HSPS TEXTILE PVT LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the challenge to an arbitral award upholding the respondent's claim for unpaid fabric supply, holding that the award was neither perverse nor patently illegal and that the respondent was entitled to benefits under the MSMED Act.
Jai Bhagwan v. State
The Delhi High Court reinstated the discharge of a Motor Vehicle Inspector from criminal charges due to lack of prima facie evidence of knowledge or intent to use forged documents, emphasizing the limited scope of interference at the charge framing stage.
Kanhaiya Ram v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to consider the petitioner's medical-based request for extension of time to join a new posting without staying the transfer order.
Lokesh @ Machchhar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC due to lack of premeditation and intention, modifying the sentence accordingly.
Bhim Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a trafficking case involving minors due to his absconding conduct, serious criminal antecedents, and ongoing investigation.
Deepak Tiwari v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a double murder case considering prolonged detention, inconclusive evidence at bail stage, and fundamental rights under Article 21, imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.
Naresh v. Seema
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order awarding maintenance to a deserted wife under Section 125 CrPC, emphasizing the husband's legal duty to support his wife despite procedural irregularities and the wife's disability pension.
Harsh Vardhan Bansal v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the MVC-III classification of properties as Super Commercial Properties under the DMC Act, validating the resultant property tax assessments and rejecting challenges based on Article 14 and procedural grounds.
Anees Ur Rahman v. M/s Smal Farmers Agribusiness Consortium
The court held that a director who had resigned prior to the cheque dishonour cannot be held liable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as liability attaches only to those in charge of and responsible for the company’s business at the relevant time.
Satish Kumar Jain v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption of debt despite admitted signatures on dishonoured cheques.