Delhi High Court

46,428 judgments

Year:

Sunil Yadav v. Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital

12 Nov 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:8782-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent hospital to complete the tender process transparently and within six weeks, addressing the petitioner's grievance of undue delay and alleged manipulation.

administrative other tender process financial bids delegated financial power transparency

Sapna Katayan v. J M Financial Asset Reconstruction Co Ltd & Ors

12 Nov 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8777

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to restrain dispossession under SARFAESI, holding that the petitioner must exhaust the efficacious remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act SARFAESI Act writ petition Articles 226 and 227

Khalid Jahangir Qazi v. Union of India

12 Nov 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:8754
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that OCI cardholders remain foreigners under the Foreigners Act but are entitled to procedural safeguards under the Citizenship Act before adverse actions like cancellation or blacklisting, setting aside arbitrary orders against the petitioner.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Overseas Citizen of India OCI card cancellation Foreigners Act, 1946 Citizenship Act, 1955

Shri Prit Pal Singh Bhatia v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors

12 Nov 2024 · Manmohan, Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela, Justice · 2024:DHC:8720-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging allotment of a cooperative society plot, upholding findings of forgery and affirming seniority-based allotment to respondent no.5.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant cooperative society membership seniority list allotment of plot forgery and fabrication

Kabir Paharia v. National Medical Commission & Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:8719-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld expert Medical Boards' reasoned opinions denying MBBS admission to a candidate with benchmark disability, emphasizing the need to balance disability rights with essential medical competencies and patient safety.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Disability Certificate Medical Board opinion MBBS eligibility

Jai Gopal Gulati v. Union of India and Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8957
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation and alternative land for alleged illegal encroachment by DDA due to inordinate delay, lack of clear ownership proof, and presence of disputed factual questions requiring civil adjudication.

property petition_dismissed writ petition illegal encroachment land ownership delay and laches

National Health Authority v. M S Intermarc

12 Nov 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:8791-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 application challenging an arbitral award filed beyond the strict 120-day limitation period, even after excluding pendency under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, is barred and cannot be condoned on administrative grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation period Section 14 Limitation Act

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) 2 v. National Highway Authority of India

12 Nov 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:8716-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld that capital grant subsidies paid by NHAI to BOT concessionaires are not liable to tax deduction at source under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, as such payments are capital contributions and not contractual payments for work.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 194C tax deduction at source capital grant subsidy Build-Own-Operate-Transfer

Management of Ashok Hotel (ITDC) v. Their Workmen & Anr.

12 Nov 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:8727-DB

The High Court and Industrial Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction by treating contract labour as employees of the principal employer without proper pleadings or reference, and the appeal directing regularization is set aside.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contract labour principal employer regularization Industrial Disputes Act

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1 v. M/s Adma Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

12 Nov 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:8756-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a mere change of company name does not invalidate penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act, but penalty orders passed beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 275(1)(c) are unsustainable.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 292B Section 275(1)(c) penalty proceedings

Cdr. Siddharth Sharma, IN v. CDR AK Srivastava (Retd.)

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8739-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired naval officer, ruling that denial based solely on financial grounds despite consistent medical opinion was impermissible.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension military service Primary Hypertension medical opinion

Lt Col S K Jha v. Union of India

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8787-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's complaint against denial of promotion and adverse ACR, holding no mala fide or sufficient grounds for interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Annual Confidentiality Report promotion denial mala fide bias

Om Narayan Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8837-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reinstatement and retiral benefits on the ground of inordinate delay and laches, holding that repeated representations do not excuse a 27-year delay in approaching the Court.

administrative petition_dismissed delay and laches writ petition Article 226 Constitution of India retiral benefits

Mohit Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8746-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Physical Standard Test result declaring the petitioner unfit after independent medical measurements confirmed compliance with prescribed physical standards, allowing him to continue in the recruitment process.

administrative petition_allowed Physical Standard Test height and chest measurement recruitment examination arbitrariness

Mini Stanly v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8774-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to grant the petitioner retrospective promotional benefits and seniority on a common seniority list for male and female officers, reaffirming the prohibition of gender-based discrimination in promotions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant common seniority list gender discrimination promotions retrospective seniority

Nagesh Ratan Daberao v. Union of India

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8878-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification for CRPF recruitment, holding that medical fitness must be determined at the time of Medical Board examination and subsequent reports cannot override that decision.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness armed forces recruitment Pilonidal Sinus overweight

Sgt Anoop Kumar PS v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8776-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of a review application seeking premature discharge, holding that the petitioner must challenge the Speaking Order before the tribunal and that grant of relief to others does not mandate identical relief.

administrative petition_dismissed premature discharge Armed Forces Tribunal Review Application Speaking Order

Sachin Negi v. Union of India

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8841-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an Army Hospital for a candidate declared unfit due to defective colour vision, allowing him a fair chance to participate in the recruitment process.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Medical Board Examination Defective Colour Vision Armed Forces recruitment Medical fitness reassessment

Union of India v. Ex Lem R Jaideep

12 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8747-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for seizure disorder, ruling the disability attributable to military service despite contrary medical opinion.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal service connection seizure disorder

Rajesh Kumar Jha v. Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited

12 Nov 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9212

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of an employee for failing to meet mandatory government sector experience criteria in a recruitment advertisement, affirming the limited scope of judicial review over departmental inquiries.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant eligibility criteria recruitment advertisement departmental inquiry judicial review