Delhi High Court
46,428 judgments
AstraZeneca AB & Anr. v. Westcoast Pharmaceutical Works Limited
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca, restraining Westcoast Pharmaceutical from infringing its patent on Osimertinib, due to the defendant's failure to file a defense and undertaking not to infringe.
Opella Healthcare Group v. Vaibhav Vohra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar trademark and copyright registrations for 'PHENSERYL', upholding the petitioner's prior rights in 'PHENSEDYL' and emphasizing the need to maintain register purity and prevent consumer confusion in pharmaceutical trademarks.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Sunlight Tour and Travels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld that reassessment under Section 147 requires assessing the income forming the basis of reopening before any other income can be assessed, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against deletion of addition and quashing of reassessment.
Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Jonas Woodhead and Sons India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Aktiebolaget Volvo against Jonas Woodhead & Sons India Ltd. for unauthorized use and infringement of the well-known 'VOLVO' trademark on vehicle parts.
COMVIVA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v. ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & DESIGN
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that a computer-implemented invention providing a technical solution for secure electronic payment authentication is patentable and not excluded as a business method or computer program per se under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act.
Ghayour, Advocates v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's cognizance order under Section 186 IPC for non-compliance with Section 195 CrPC but refused to quash the FIR and chargesheet, affirming the police's power to investigate despite procedural bars on courts.
MS Axalta Coating Systems India Pvt. Ltd. v. MS NCS Auto Hub Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the arbitration clause's venue is the seat of arbitration and that jurisdictional objections are to be decided by the arbitrator.
Bal Kishan & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction under Section 323 IPC, upheld the probation order, and directed the appellants to pay the compensation as ordered by the trial court.
Jayant Budhiraja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act against the petitioner for employing a juvenile under 14 years, holding that a prima facie case was made out and defenses are to be examined at trial.
Sachin Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR and charges under Section 370 IPC and Section 23 JJ Act, holding that prima facie offences were established and inherent powers to quash must be exercised sparingly after charges are framed.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Abdulkhaliq Abdulkader Chamadia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction and ancillary reliefs against defendants selling counterfeit Louis Vuitton products, decreeing the suit ex-parte under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to contest.
Abdul Salam v. GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to provide the petitioner a hearing and pass a speaking order on his citizenship status after considering all documents, without deciding the merits.
M Balan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's plea for an additional inquiry as a representation and pass a reasoned order within 12 weeks, without expressing any opinion on merits or jurisdiction.
Ajay Darshan Behera v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Statute 37 of Jamia Millia Islamia Act, rejecting the petitioner's challenge that it violates Articles 14 and 16 by lacking inquiry procedure before removal of teachers.
Murlidhar v. EX SPR (MACP NK) P Arun Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension and broad banding to an ex-serviceman whose depressive disorder was held attributable to military service despite contrary medical board findings.
Rakshit Khurana v. Indus Tower Limited
The Delhi High Court held that inter se shareholder disputes concerning company management do not constitute commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and dismissed the appeal challenging the plaint's return.
Rita Sharma v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by accepting proved ITR income, recognizing major sons as dependents, and awarding loss of consortium to each legal heir.
Shakuntala Devi v. Mohan Das
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition setting aside the dismissal of eviction petition, holding that bona fide requirement was proved and alternative accommodation was unsuitable under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Panchhi Petha Store v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the Regional Director under Section 16 of the Companies Act cannot decide trademark ownership in company name rectification applications and set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's application.
M/S PAUL ENGINEERING WORKS AND ANR v. SHRI RAM DIYA SHARMA
The Delhi High Court upheld the allowance of amendment clarifying delay rather than refusal in a suit for specific performance, holding that limitation begins only on clear refusal when no date is fixed for performance.