Union of India & Ors. v. Amar Rana

Delhi High Court · 09 Dec 2024 · 2024:DHC:9142-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
W.P.(C) 16272/2024
2024:DHC:9142-DB
administrative appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying established legal principles.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 16272/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 16272/2024, CM APPL. 68489/2024 & CM APPL.
68490/2024 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Nishan Gautam, CGSC
WITH
Ms. Sanjana Mehrotra, Mr. Mayank Sharma, Mr. Ajay Kanojiya, Mr. Vinay Kaushik, Mr. Arindam Sarin and Mr. Vipin Verma, Advs.
VERSUS
AMAR RANA .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R (ORAL)
25.11.2024 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. As we have laid down the principles applicable in such cases in our judgments in Staff Selection Commission v Aman Singh[1] and Staff Selection Commission v Amit Goswami[2], and the impugned order makes no reference to the individual facts of this case, the order is quashed and set aside with consent of parties and the OA is remanded for de novo adjudication keeping in mind the principles laid

2. Both parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 9 December 2024.

3. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J