Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Smt. Mani Kapoor v. U.P.S.R.T.C. Through Its Regional Manager Bhaemsali Depot, Meerut
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by upholding functional disability assessment and increasing non-pecuniary damages, recognizing the economic value of a housewife's work based on skilled worker wages.
Sunder Singh Bisht v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall the child victim for re-examination after a five-year delay, emphasizing protection of the child witness and preventing abuse of process under the POCSO Act.
FENA PRIVATE LTD v. BALWINDER KUMAR & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the trademark 'NIPPU' for deceptive similarity with the prior registered and extensively used trademark 'NIP', directing its removal from the Register of Trade Marks.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. Genpact Consulting Singapore Pte Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of revisional proceedings under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue and that the Commissioner cannot revise an order based on mere change of opinion or inadequate inquiry.
Daljeet Auto Centre v. Jagmohan Singh Bakshi
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and limiting the scope of revision under Section 25-B(8) to supervisory review without reappraisal of evidence.
Ajay Vishwakarma & Ors. v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside 50% contributory negligence against a deceased pedestrian, applied Uttar Pradesh minimum wages for compensation, enhanced loss of consortium and interest, and directed the Insurance Company to pay Rs. 16,32,500/-.
SH Nepal Singh Koli v. SH Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation under non-pecuniary heads in a motor accident claim while upholding the functional disability assessment, increasing total compensation from Rs. 9.28 lakh to Rs. 10.28 lakh.
Manisha v. Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by aligning functional disability with certified permanent impairment, recognizing household work as basis for loss of future earnings.
M/S Sunrise Enterprises v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contract disputes after exhaustion of the contractual dispute resolution mechanism.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. GOEL TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement.
PNB Housing Finance Ltd v. M/S K.K BANIJYA PVT LTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement exists and is undisputed, the court must appoint an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, regardless of disputes on merits or settlement claims.
Rajbala v. Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by aligning Functional Disability with Permanent Physical Impairment, recognizing loss of future earnings for a housewife.
M/S SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. JAISWAL TECHNO COMMERCIAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator through DIAC under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration to proceed despite respondent’s non-appearance, affirming the validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors. v. Dr Arvind Kumar
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with a Tribunal's ad interim order, allowing the writ petition to be withdrawn subject to caveats and directing the Tribunal to proceed with the OA.
Sanjay R Hegde v. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that social media account suspensions must comply with the IT Rules, 2021 and constitutional free speech guarantees, and dismissed the petition after the account was reinstated.
Shabana v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recognized the necessity of a centralized portal under Section 79(3)(b) IT Act to streamline lawful data requests and takedown of unlawful content by intermediaries, directing continued cooperation and reporting.
Promila Bhagat v. Nutan Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the suit as barred by limitation and not maintainable under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, holding that limitation involving disputed facts cannot be decided as a preliminary issue without proper evidence and procedure.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S Veera Builders Thr Its Partner & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the municipal corporation's suit for possession of reserved land held by respondents for over six decades with sanctioned building plans, holding the suit frivolous and without cause of action.
Dharamveer v. Ritu Jain
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises subject to payment of user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying the eviction order until 31.10.2025.
Union of India v. Ashish Anan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside prolonged suspension of a police officer due to lack of reasoned orders and directed his reinstatement, emphasizing that suspension must be justified and not punitive.