Delhi High Court
29,047 judgments
Gaurav Jain v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
MSA Global LLC Oman v. Engineering Projects India Ltd
Delhi High Court holds that the arbitration seat is India, Indian courts have jurisdiction, and grants injunction restraining arbitration continuation due to arbitrator's non-disclosure and potential bias.
State v. Garibullah
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a motor accident case, holding that mere high speed without evidence of rash or negligent driving is insufficient for conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.
Management/Chairman Balvantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Senior Secondary School v. Anil Kumar Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court held that Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act does not apply to voluntary retirement under Rule 48-A of the CCS Rules, quashing the Tribunal’s order reinstating the employee.
Tarun Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the tender award due to disputed factual issues and lack of demonstrated prejudice from procedural lapses, holding such matters require trial in a civil court.
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Hamid
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a husband charged under Section 306 IPC, ruling that mere extramarital affair without direct instigation or cruelty does not constitute abetment of suicide.
Dr. Saroj Bahl v. Sushma Batra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to reject the plaint, holding that a non-executant alleging forgery may seek declaratory relief with consequential injunctions, and such issues as limitation and personal interest require trial.
M/s Guru Kirpa Enterprises v. Office of the Commissioner of Customs (Export)
The Delhi High Court held that Customs orders must clearly identify and be signed by the officer passing them to ensure accountability, and procedural conditions under Section 149 of the Customs Act must be strictly followed for amendment of shipping bills.
I Money Wallet Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II / Avato, Ward 64, Zone 4 & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a GST tax demand order, subject to the Supreme Court's pending decision on the validity of related extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act.
Patanjali Foods Limited v. Assistant Commissioner CGST Narela Division & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the final approval date of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is the binding date for extinguishing prior claims, setting aside tax demands raised before that date and allowing fresh demands only for the post-approval period.
M/S JK (INDIA) FABS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed re-assessment of customs Bills of Entry and refund of excess Infrastructure Cess paid due to a technical glitch, affirming that refunds require re-assessment under the law.
Lalit Kumar Babu Lal Tater v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue Show Cause Notices under the Customs Act, upholding the Supreme Court's review ruling that such officers are proper officers and that the notices were validly served.
Dr. Davindera & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Sections 354 and 509 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
GAIL INDIA LTD v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a Sole Arbitrator accordingly.
Partap Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of appointment order for alternative employment to a disabled government employee after completion of requisite training.
M/S Lokdhun Telemedia Pvt Ltd v. Achla Sabharwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw a commercial appeal and disposed of it accordingly, allowing the appellant to pursue remedies before the Commercial Court.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Shiv Raj Meena
Termination of an employee without a fair and reasoned departmental inquiry, especially where the admission of guilt is conditional, violates principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside.
Suresh Kumar v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court held that mere registration of an FIR without a pending case does not require disclosure in the attestation form and quashed disciplinary removal of a CISF constable on this ground, ordering reinstatement.
Vishal Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to treat the writ petition challenging termination as a representation under Rule 26 of the CISF Rules, 2001, and decide it within eight weeks.
Manju Yadav v. Anoopam Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim maintenance order of ₹12,000 per month under the DV Act, refusing to enhance it without material proof of higher income or concealment.