Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Abhishek Suhane v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:141-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed limited extension for retention of government accommodation due to delayed communication of de-classification and medical grounds, restraining eviction till 20 January 2025.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Government General Pool Residential Accommodation Rules, 2017 Security Related Expenditure Scheme de-classification government accommodation retention

Shiwali Suman v. The State & Tarun Kumar

09 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1053
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed partial release of settlement funds to the petitioner wife upon divorce by mutual consent while retaining balance linked to quashing of FIR, enforcing phased payments under matrimonial settlement.

family other Significant Settlement Deed Divorce by Mutual Consent Section 482 CrPC Quashing of FIR

M/S BRANDAVAN FOOD PRODUCTS v. CAPITAL EQUIPMENT INDIA

09 Jan 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:458

The Delhi High Court held that pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act is mandatory unless urgent interim relief is demonstrated, and returned the plaint for compliance with mediation requirements.

civil other Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 12A Pre-institution mediation Urgent interim relief

Ashok Gupta v. Krishna Wanti

09 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:325
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order allowing a co-owner landlord's bona fide need for premises despite old age, affirming limited revisional scope under the Rent Control Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant co-owner eviction petition bona fide need landlord-tenant relationship Delhi Rent Control Act

Yogesh Dhupar & Husband v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:222

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition and discharged the brother-in-law and sister-in-law accused of dowry harassment due to lack of specific allegations against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC dowry harassment discharge of accused Section 406 IPC

Syed Faiz Ali v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

09 Jan 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:170

The Delhi High Court rejected anticipatory bail to Syed Faiz Ali in a multi-accused fraud case involving fake job promises abroad, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and corroborated victim evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail fraud forgery impersonation

Salman Khan v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

09 Jan 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:169

The Delhi High Court dismissed Salman Khan's bail application in a multi-accused job fraud case, holding that prima facie evidence of conspiracy and cheating precludes bail at this stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed regular bail cheating forged documents conspiracy

Indian Hockey Federation v. UOI and Ors.

09 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:183

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking directions for participation and conduct of hockey in the 34th National Games due to non-prosecution and mootness of the subject matter.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition non-prosecution dismissal in default National Games

M/S MANJALLY JEWELLERS v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ORS

09 Jan 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:115

The Delhi High Court held that mid-term revision of bullion import quotas without prior notice or hearing is arbitrary, directing the DGFT to reconsider allocations after affording opportunity of hearing.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Tariff Rate Quota Bullion Import India-UAE CEPA Natural Justice

M/s Vimla Store v. The Commissioner & Another

09 Jan 2025 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela Vibh... · 2025:DHC:63-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of an FPS operator seeking withdrawal of her resignation after six years, holding that the delay and public interest justified refusal of reinstatement.

administrative appeal_dismissed withdrawal of resignation Fair Price Shop administrative appeal Article 14

Manohar Lal Bhatia v. Harpal Singh Lamba

09 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:126

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to recall the order permitting recovery of use and occupation charges due to non-compliance with court directions and failure to pay arrears.

civil petition_dismissed use and occupation charges mesne profits possession recovery court orders compliance

Amar Singh and Sons Tree Nuts LLP v. The Superintendent of Customs, EPM, Import & Ors.

09 Jan 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:89-DB

The Delhi High Court restrained the Customs Department from encashing the bank guarantee pending appeal against a customs duty demand order, relying on statutory pre-deposit requirements and a government Circular.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Advance Authorisation License Customs Act, 1962 bank guarantee encashment stay

Malook Chand v. Delhi Development Authority

09 Jan 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:92

The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to consider a Joint Committee's recommendation on possession of a flat within eight weeks, disposing of the writ petition with liberty to revive if aggrieved.

administrative petition_dismissed Delhi Development Authority possession Joint Committee Sub-Divisional Magistrate

Dinesh Singh v. Pooja

09 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:81

The Delhi High Court stayed execution of an eviction order until 31.12.2025 on terms of payment of occupation charges and timely vacation, following an amicable settlement between landlord and tenant.

property appeal_allowed eviction order stay of execution user and occupation charges landlord-tenant dispute

Mukesh Singh Rajput v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that ACP/MACP benefits must be granted reckoning service from initial appointment date ignoring re-mustering, directing respondents to grant benefits accordingly.

labor petition_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression ACP benefits Modified Assured Career Progression re-mustering

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited v. Friends Inc & Anr.

09 Jan 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:776

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., declaring "PETER ENGLAND" a well-known trademark and restraining defendants from infringing its use.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Well-known trademark Trade Marks Act 1999 Permanent injunction

Sandeep Gupta v. Union Public Service Commission and Ors

09 Jan 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1633-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the petitioner's interim relief application by a specified date, emphasizing timely adjudication and appointed counsel to assist the petitioner.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal interim relief timely adjudication writ petition

MS L R SHARMA AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

08 Jan 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9835-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to correct the recorded appearance of counsel in a prior judgment through a corrigendum, as the error was inadvertent and unopposed.

other other correction of judgment clerical error appearance counsel representation

Synergies Casting Ltd v. National Research Development Corporation & Anr.

08 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:133-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals against orders directing deposit of arbitral award amounts pending Section 34 petitions are not maintainable except as expressly provided under Sections 37 or 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 37 appeal Section 50 appeal

Ravi Prakash Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:106-DB

The Delhi High Court held that experience for promotion must be assessed by nature of work, not pay scale, and directed reassessment of the petitioner's eligibility for promotion to Logistics Officer in BSF.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Promotion Logistics Officer Recruitment Rules Experience requirement