Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Anil Khattar v. Capt Preetinder Singh Thapar & Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a Rent Controller's order refusing amendment, holding that such orders are appealable under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and must be challenged via statutory appeal rather than Article 227 jurisdiction.
Vijay Kumar Setia v. Capt Preetinder Singh Thapar & Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an order refusing amendment in eviction proceedings, holding that the order is appealable under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and the petitioner must exhaust that remedy before invoking Article 227 jurisdiction.
Sandeep Puri v. Sharda Ahuja
The High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord, affirming the validity of eviction based on bona fide need of a married daughter and the limited scope of revision under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Suresh Kumar v. Sharda Ahuja
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord, affirming bona fide need for eviction including for a married daughter and tenant's liability to pay mesne profits post eviction.
T.K. Roy v. Delhi University
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrospective promotion to Technical Officer, holding that the petitioner was not eligible as per service rules and had accepted promotion from a later date, barring reopening of the issue.
Vikas Kumar Jain v. Rishi Vashishtha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a property sale agreement containing an arbitration clause.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SHAGUN SURBHI ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes, holding that sufficient service attempts and existence of an arbitration clause mandate such appointment despite respondents' non-appearance.
MS TERRESTRIAL FOODS LIMITED v. SANSKRITI FOOD EQUIPMENTS EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Purchase Order, allowing jurisdictional objections to be raised before the arbitrator.
Sanjeevani Ayurveda v. The Director General Directorate General of Health Services Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a healthcare services agreement, affirming the mandatory nature of arbitration agreement enforcement.
Muzaffar Ahmad and Anr v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to re-approach after the Tribunal decides on revival of an Original Application following dismissal of a related Supreme Court SLP.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. SANTOSH PAL MEENA
The Delhi High Court quashed the Tribunal's order keeping a removal order in abeyance and directed the disciplinary authority to decide the pending appeal within four weeks following principles of natural justice.
Union of India v. Deep Chandra Tiwari
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that recovery of alleged overpayments from a retired railway employee beyond five years and post-retirement is impermissible, and any pay scale reduction must follow due process.
M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. EHPS EVER HOLIDAY PLANNERS SERVICES
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where the respondent defaulted and failed to respond to arbitration notice.
The Supreme Industries Limited v. Ankit Goel Trading as Goel Trading Company
The Delhi High Court held that each fresh act of trademark infringement gives rise to a new cause of action permitting a fresh suit and allowed the appeal decreeing the second suit for infringement of the mark 'SUPREME WATERLINE'.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Sagar Vilas Dhanawade and Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan recovery disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement despite respondents' non-appearance.
Union of India v. Commissioner of North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions filed by the Union of India seeking recovery of maintenance charges from MCD for Road Under Bridges, holding that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for disputed monetary claims involving delay and factual controversies.
Pravesh Kumar v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court held Delhi Jal Board liable for the death of a minor child due to negligence, applying res ipsa loquitur and awarding Rs. 22 lakh compensation under Article 226 for violation of Article 21.
M/S CHIBBA AGRO PVT LTD v. NARENDER KUMAR GUPTA
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of pre-litigation mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory but failure to settle does not vitiate compliance, and dismissed the appeal challenging the suit's maintainability.
M/S GLAZEBROOKE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S ORBIS TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed a cheque bounce complaint filed one day beyond the limitation period without condonation, holding that service of demand notice on the company suffices for its directors and limitation runs from the date of effective service on the company.
Abdus Samad & Anr. v. Principal District and Sessions Judge South
The Delhi High Court upheld the allotment of a vacant chamber slot to a senior advocate, ruling that seniority governs re-allotment in absence of specific rules and that a co-allottee's NOC does not confer priority.