Delhi High Court

101,979 judgments

Year:

Mr Jos Chiramel, Adv. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....

27 Feb 2013 · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN O R... · 2013:DHC:1086-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that delay barred the appellant's claims for confirmation and pay parity, and that such claims require executive evaluation beyond writ jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant laches confirmation of service pay parity equal pay for equal work

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Madhushree Gupta

27 Feb 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:1073-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) where the assessee made a bona fide claim based on prevailing judicial precedents, clarifying that mere incorrect claims do not automatically attract penalty.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) penalty Section 80HHC deduction Section 80AB overriding effect bona fide claim

Meena Tejrana v. Suresh Kumar Jindal and Anr.

27 Feb 2013 · Manmohan J · 2013:DHC:1070

The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance of a registered sale agreement, directing defendants to execute the sale deed and hand over possession after failing to perform their contractual obligations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Specific Performance Agreement to Sell Permanent Injunction Registered Sale Deed

Brig. P.J.S. Rangar v. UOI & Ors.

27 Feb 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2013:DHC:1074-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a promotion panel based on reiterated existing benchmarks, holding that no vested right to promotion arises before appointment orders are issued.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion empanelment Office Memorandum Department of Personnel and Training

Divya Oram Kujur v. State & Anr

27 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1075

The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse induced by a man already married, making the woman believe she is his lawful wife, amounts to rape under Section 376 IPC, setting aside the discharge order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 375 IPC Section 376 IPC Consent Rape

Divya Oram Kujur v. State & Anr

27 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1076

The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse obtained by deceiving a woman into believing she is lawfully married to the man constitutes rape under Section 376 IPC, setting aside the discharge of the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape consent deception lawful marriage

Bachita Baruah v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

27 Feb 2013 · Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1087-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Instruction No.42 directing Registering Officers not to examine the validity of documents presented for registration, holding that such matters are for courts and not within the Registering Officer's statutory duties.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Registration Act, 1908 Indian Contract Act, 1872 Instruction No.42 Registering Officer duties

Rajiv Mahendru & Anr. v. Chairman-MD, I.R.C.C., New Delhi & Anr.

27 Feb 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1084

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking promotion, holding no automatic promotion right exists without fitness and DPC approval, reservation policy justified junior ST promotion, voluntary retirement acceptance estopped claims, and sick PSU financial incapacity bars monetary benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion entitlement Departmental Promotion Committee reservation policy 40 point roster

Phool Chand & Ors. v. I.R.C.C., New Delhi & Anr.

27 Feb 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1085

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition on merits for Petitioner No.1 adopting prior reasoning and dismissed it as withdrawn for Petitioner No.2 who took voluntary retirement.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition voluntary retirement scheme withdrawal of petition service law

Dayanand v. Sunita & Ors.

27 Feb 2013 · Suresh Kait · 2013:DHC:1077

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay caused by counsel’s lapse and directed the tribunal to decide the review application on merits in a motor accident compensation claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant review application condonation of delay Limitation Act Section 5 motor accident claim

Pradeep @ Sheru @ Sher Singh v. State

27 Feb 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1072

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and raping a minor girl below 16 years, holding that her consent was immaterial, but reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping rape minor consent age determination

MIS AIR STATE COURIER PVT LTD v. S.M.GUDDU

27 Feb 2013 · Vipin Sanghi · 2013:DHC:7453

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's discretionary imposition of costs on the petitioner employer for seeking adjournment without sufficient justification, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the same.

labor petition_dismissed Labour Court imposition of costs adjournment discretionary power

Delid Waste Management Ltd v. Commissioner, Trade and Taxes

27 Feb 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; R.V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:7572-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a security deposit demanded for de-sealing premises under the Delhi VAT Act must be reasonable and proportionate to the assessed tax liability and penalties, reducing an excessive ₹20 crore demand to ₹26 lakhs.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 60(4) Section 30 Section 86(13)

Gopal Decd Thru Lrs & Ors v. Union of India

27 Feb 2013 · Reva Khetrapal · 2013:DHC:7840

The Delhi High Court condoned delay caused by counsel's mistake and awarded compensation for land acquisition as per precedent, denying interest for the delay period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Limitation Act Section 5 Section 151 CPC land acquisition compensation

P DAS GUPTA v. CBI

27 Feb 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:8206

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition filed by P Das Gupta against the CBI as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel's request.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn CBI criminal procedure

Ramesh Kumar Rawat v. Surender Kumar Sharma & Ors.

27 Feb 2013 · G. S. Sistani

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions on the basis of an amicable settlement with liberty to revive in case of default by the respondents.

civil petition_allowed Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Sections 11 and 12 contempt petition willful disobedience

Delhi Development Authority v. M/S Aeroshine

27 Feb 2013 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J · 2013:DHC:1068-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that unearned increase payable on transfer of leasehold rights must be calculated based on rates prevailing on the date of application to the lessor, not on later dates, and dismissed DDA's appeal seeking recalculation at higher rates.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant unearned increase leasehold rights Delhi Development Authority Companies Act 1956

Balraj Singh Rathi v. State & Ors.

27 Feb 2013 · G.P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:8165

The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners in a land dispute case, holding that prima facie possession supported by valid documents justifies bail despite dismissal of related civil suit.

criminal bail_granted bail possession specific performance civil suit dismissal

Manorama Sinha v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Feb 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1082

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking compassionate appointment to the second wife and her son, holding that the extant policy excludes second wives married without permission during service from such appointment.

administrative petition_dismissed compassionate appointment second wife permission for second marriage extant policy

P.L. Adlakha & Ors. v. State & Anr.

27 Feb 2013 · V.K. Shali · 2013:DHC:6780

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from a property dispute between brothers, holding that civil disputes cannot be converted into criminal cases and such misuse of criminal law is an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR civil dispute abuse of process Section 482 Cr.P.C.