Phool Chand & Ors. v. I.R.C.C., New Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 27 Feb 2013 · 2013:DHC:1085

Valmiki J. Mehta

WP(C) No.3895/1999

2013:DHC:1085

administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition on merits for Petitioner No.1 adopting prior reasoning and dismissed it as withdrawn for Petitioner No.2 who took voluntary retirement.

Full Text

WP(C) No.3895/1999 HIGH COURT OF DELHI WP(C) No.3895/1999 February 27, 2013 PHOOL CHAND & ORS. .... Petitioners
Through: none.

VERSUS

I.R.C.C., NEW DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition qua the petitioner No.1 is dismissed adopting the reasoning of points 2 & 3 of the grounds urged on behalf of the respondents as given today while dismissing the WP(C) No.895/1997 titled as Rajiv Mahendru & Anr. Vs. Chairman-MD, I.R.C.C., New Delhi & Anr.. So far as the petitioner No. 2-Sh. Man Mohan Sharma is concerned, he has already given a letter which is filed as Annexure-A by the respondent No.1 to its counter affidavit whereby Sh.Man Mohan Sharma has said that 2013:DHC:1085 WP(C) No.3895/1999 he has taken VRS and therefore he is not interested in continuing the case and withdraws the petition.

2. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed on merits so far as the petitioner No.1 is concerned and dismissed as withdrawn so far as the petitioner No.2 is concerned.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2013 ak

Phool Chand & Ors. v. I.R.C.C., New Delhi & Anr.

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation