Delhi High Court
101,979 judgments
P. Suresh Kumar v. Union of India
This judgment consolidates and disposes of multiple connected writ petitions filed against the Union of India before the Delhi High Court.
The Engineering and Industrial Corpn v. Saraswati Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for specific performance and possession in favor of plaintiffs who paid full consideration and were given possession, holding limitation began only upon vendor's clear refusal to perform.
Satish Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the offence, set aside his conviction under IPC Sections 392/397/411, and remitted the case to the Juvenile Justice Board for inquiry.
Satish Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the offence, set aside his conviction by the criminal court, and remitted the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board for inquiry.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Siemens Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing Siemens, as lead partner of a joint venture, to claim additional costs for unforeseen pile foundation work, affirming its jurisdiction and rejecting PGCIL's challenge.
Amrik Singh v. Local Shopping Complex Welfare Association
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a person unlawfully occupying a general taxi stand site, upholding the removal of unauthorized structures and affirming the site's use as a free parking area for all taxi drivers.
Geeta Khanna v. Manager Arvind Gupta DAV Centenary
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that an employee appointed as a Nursery Teacher in an unrecognized school cannot claim regularization as a Yoga Teacher in a recognized school without valid appointment.
Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Vidya Dhar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an injunction restraining a media telecast, holding that freedom of speech prevails absent a prima facie substantial risk of prejudice to a fair trial.
K.C. Sharma v. BSES Yamuna Power Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary and appellate orders for lack of speaking reasons, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders to uphold principles of natural justice under Article 14.
Ramesh Singh v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an RBI employee seeking permission to appear for the Research Officer exam, holding that he did not meet the prescribed educational qualifications under the 2006 recruitment rules.
Sh. P. Suresh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that colour blind personnel recruited prior to 2002 have a vested right to promotion and non-discriminatory treatment which cannot be withdrawn retrospectively by government policy, quashing orders denying such promotions.
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. SK Bhatia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi must bear the cost of shifting an electric pole causing obstruction on a public road, modifying the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum's order accordingly.
Subhash Kapur v. Suraj Prakash Kapoor and Ors.
In two family partition suits tried together with overlapping issues, the defendant whose defence was struck off in one suit was entitled to cross-examine the plaintiff on matters relating to both suits and the common Will, as partial consolidation does not merge suits entirely.
Perfetti Van Melle S.P.A. & Anr. v. Om Prakash Khushwant & Anr.
Delhi High Court held that defendants' use of deceptively similar mark and label infringed plaintiffs' trademark and copyright, granting permanent injunction and damages including punitive damages.
CIT v. Titan Securities Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the ITAT order deleting addition of share application money under section 68, holding that the Assessing Officer must be allowed to verify and discredit the assessee’s evidence when material indicates involvement with accommodation entry providers.
Union of India & Ors. v. Malhotra Book Depot
The Delhi High Court held that removal of a trademark without issuing the mandatory statutory notice in Form O-3 is invalid, entitling the proprietor to restoration and renewal beyond the prescribed limitation period.
Ravneet Singh v. Parul Tandon
The Delhi High Court set aside a Family Court order modifying child custody without discussing evidence and directed a rehearing with reasoned consideration of all evidence.
Kartar Singh v. GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court set aside dismissal of a jail warder for smuggling tobacco and substituted a lesser penalty of stoppage of increments on grounds of proportionality.