Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

UOI v. J.C. Gonsalvez

25 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2054-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the Government to pay Assistant Chemists and Chemists the higher pay scales recommended by the 5th Central Pay Commission, rejecting selective denial as impermissible discrimination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant 5th Central Pay Commission Assistant Chemists Chemists pay scale

UOI v. J.C. Gonsalvez

25 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2053-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Government must uniformly implement the 5th Central Pay Commission's pay scale recommendations for scientific staff, including Assistant Chemists and Chemists, and cannot selectively deny them higher pay.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant 5th Central Pay Commission Assistant Chemists Chemists pay scale

Ramesh Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi

25 Apr 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Siddharth Mridul · 2013:DHC:2064-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Ramesh Kumar for murder and attempt to murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence proving deliberate ignition of fire using petrol.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence deliberate fire petrol accelerant Section 302 IPC

Munshi Lal v. Pradeep Anand

25 Apr 2013 · Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:2081

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking amendment of the written statement to retract earlier admissions on rent amount and arrears, holding that amendments must be bonafide and not prejudicial.

civil petition_dismissed Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings admission in pleadings Delhi Rent Control Act

Delhi Development Authority v. Rajiv Khurana

25 Apr 2013 · R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2056

The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal due to invalid sanction for prosecution under the Delhi Development Act, emphasizing that sanctioning authorities must apply their mind to all relevant facts including prior convictions before granting sanction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sanction for prosecution Delhi Development Act, 1957 section 29(2) section 49

Ajit Singh v. State & Ors.

25 Apr 2013 · V.K. Shali · 2013:DHC:2078

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against probate rejection, holding that the Will was not proved in accordance with law and was surrounded by suspicious circumstances including concealment of a prior partition decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate petition Will Indian Succession Act 1925 Section 63

International College of Financial Planning Ltd v. Sanjiv Batra

25 Apr 2013 · A.K. Pathak · 2013:DHC:2069

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s award of mesne profits and damages against a tenant who unlawfully occupied leased premises and caused extensive damage beyond permitted alterations.

civil appeal_dismissed mesne profits lease agreement market rent damages

EX. SUB. RAJENDER SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA

25 Apr 2013 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA · 2013:DHC:2076-DB

The Delhi High Court held that denial of extension of Army service before its commencement due to medical unfitness does not amount to cutting short of service under the Army Group Insurance Scheme, and referred the matter to a Full Bench for authoritative determination.

service_law other Procedural Army Group Insurance Scheme Para 59 extended service medical invalidation

NB RIS Ravinder Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Apr 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2013:DHC:2075-DB

The Delhi High Court held that arbitrary cancellation of a No Objection Certificate and rejection of a meritorious army personnel's candidature for a civilian post was illegal, directing his appointment despite his promotion and extended service tenure.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate Army Order 78/1979 premature discharge civilian post appointment

Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Randhir Singh & Anr

25 Apr 2013 · Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:2071

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of a government authority lacking party status and legal title, holding it had no locus standi to challenge eviction execution orders and must pursue independent legal remedies.

civil petition_dismissed locus standi eviction proceedings Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 execution of decree

Sushoban Luthra & Anr v. Major Ravindra Mohan Kapur & Ors

25 Apr 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2013:DHC:2079-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a Will despite objections regarding suspicious execution, undue influence, and certified copy irregularities, affirming that minor discrepancies do not invalidate a duly executed Will.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate Will execution undue influence Registration Act 1908

Anjali Gupta v. Sachin Gupta

25 Apr 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:2082

The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance from ₹17,500 to ₹25,000 per month by applying the Annurita Vohra principle for apportioning disposable income under Section 125 Cr.P.C., clarifying that Section 127 Cr.P.C. remedies remain available.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. Section 127 Cr.P.C. Annurita Vohra ratio

Pankaj Singh v. State

25 Apr 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:6925

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a co-accused with a lesser role and advanced age while refusing bail to the main accused who allegedly inflicted fatal injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed bail regular bail custody ante-mortem injuries

Marubeni India Pvt. Ltd. v. DIT

25 Apr 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2072-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest income from surplus fund investments is non-operating income for transfer pricing, abnormal closure expenses must be excluded from operating costs, and upheld the allocation of indirect expenses between business segments.

tax appeal_allowed Significant transfer pricing arm's length price interest income operating income

GE CAPITAL TRANSPORATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD v. RAJ SINGH

25 Apr 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:7862

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple criminal revision petitions as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the parties.

criminal appeal_dismissed criminal revision petition amicable settlement withdrawal of petition dismissal as withdrawn

Veena Gupta & Anr v. Ramesh Kumar Aggarwal & Ors

25 Apr 2013 · Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:8526

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite the trial and dispose of the matter preferably within one year, emphasizing the principle of timely justice.

criminal other Procedural expeditious trial trial court directions witness evidence timely justice

Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Anr v. Sushila and Anr

25 Apr 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7608-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting family pension to the widow of a casual laborer, affirming that long service in casual capacity is deemed permanent for pension benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant family pension casual laborer regularization pensionary benefits

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)

23 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhru · 2013:DHC:2044-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Reassessment notices issued beyond six years without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing before the appellate order are time barred and invalid under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice Section 149 limitation Section 150 exception

Dr. Rajesh Kumar v. UOI & Ors.

23 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:2025-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner’s claim was barred by limitation and res judicata and that he could not claim parity in pay and promotion with an employee of a different department.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant res judicata limitation pay scale revision Dr. Seshagiri Committee

Savita Gupta v. The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

23 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:2029

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a promoted employee, holding that transfer orders are an incident of service and courts will not interfere absent policy violation or malafide.

labor petition_dismissed transfer order promotion transfer policy incident of service