Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Ramesh @ Ramu @ Dudh Nath v. State; Neelu Lunga v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' convictions for robbery and grievous hurt but reduced the fines considering their circumstances, dismissing the appeals.
Neelu Lunga v. State
The criminal appeal filed by Neelu Lunga was disposed of by the Delhi High Court on 23rd April 2013 by referring to a common detailed judgment delivered in a related case.
Ram Babu v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction for rape and criminal intimidation due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical and forensic evidence.
Narender Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the murder conviction of Narender Singh due to unreliable last seen evidence and doubtful circumstantial proof, emphasizing the need for a complete and credible chain of evidence to sustain conviction.
Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax v. Simplex Infrastructure & Foundry Works
The Delhi High Court held that the definition of 'Consulting Engineer' under Section 65(31) of the Finance Act, 1994, as applicable during 1997-2001, does not include companies or bodies corporate.
Yash Pal Saini v. Pushpa Saini and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree granting possession and mesne profits to the plaintiff, rejecting defendants' claims of family settlement and joint ownership due to lack of evidence.
Rajender Prasad v. National Human Rights Commission
The Delhi High Court held that contractual employment for a fixed term does not confer a right to regularization, and termination upon expiry of the contract was lawful in absence of eligibility under recruitment rules.
Manohar Lal Madan v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for allotment under the Rohini Residential Scheme after the Nazul Land Rules came into force is governed by the statutory Rules, allowing allotment to persons owning DDA flats or plots under 67 sq. metres.
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORP LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)
The Delhi High Court held that reopening an income tax assessment beyond four years is invalid without an allegation of failure to disclose material facts, quashing the Section 148 notice and subsequent proceedings against Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. for AY 2004-05.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's fresh writ petition for enforcement of an earlier order, holding that enforcement must be sought by alleging disobedience of the prior order and not by filing a new writ petition.
Sharma Montessori School v. Union of India & Ors.
Temporary allotment of government land does not confer permanent rights, and eviction under the Public Premises Act is justified when possession is not surrendered, especially when land use is governed by a Zonal Development Plan.
Arjun Dev & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's correction limiting skilled grade pay entitlement to the date of joining or October 16, 1981, whichever is later, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.
Hall and Anderson Ltd and Anr v. National Textile Corporation Ltd and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction to consider joint venture proposals, holding that the right of first refusal under the Supreme Court settlement arises only if the respondents intend to sell or deal with the land.
DELHI CHIT FUND ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that services rendered by chit fund foremen are not taxable under section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, quashing the relevant exemption notification to that extent.
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)
Reassessment notices issued beyond six years without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing before the appellate order are time barred and invalid under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)
Reassessment notices issued beyond six years without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing before the appellate order are barred by limitation and invalid under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Mohd Amin Khan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 40 of the UAP Act for possession of a satellite phone intended for terrorism but acquitted him of charges under Sections 120B and 122 IPC due to lack of evidence of waging war.
Naik Sh. S.L. Mauriya v. Chairman, Gandhi Samiti & Darshan Samiti & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization of adhoc/contractual service, holding that such appointments without sanctioned posts and regular recruitment cannot be regularized as per the Supreme Court's Umadevi judgment.
Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Subash Chand and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the equivalence of the Prathama Pariksha qualification to matriculation for promotion in a public sector bank is a matter of employer discretion and the Central Government's recognition applies only to Central Government employment.
Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Subash Chand and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that equivalence of the Prathama Pariksha qualification to matriculation for promotion in a public sector bank is a matter of employer discretion and the Central Government's recognition applies only to Central Government employment.