Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Ramesh @ Ramu @ Dudh Nath v. State; Neelu Lunga v. State

23 Apr 2013 · S. P. Garg · 2013:DHC:2030

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' convictions for robbery and grievous hurt but reduced the fines considering their circumstances, dismissing the appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery grievous hurt Section 394 IPC Section 308 IPC

Neelu Lunga v. State

23 Apr 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:2031

The criminal appeal filed by Neelu Lunga was disposed of by the Delhi High Court on 23rd April 2013 by referring to a common detailed judgment delivered in a related case.

criminal other criminal appeal High Court of Delhi disposal of appeal common judgment

Ram Babu v. State

23 Apr 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:2032

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction for rape and criminal intimidation due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration contradictions

Narender Singh v. State

23 Apr 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ved Prakash Vaish · 2013:DHC:2039-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the murder conviction of Narender Singh due to unreliable last seen evidence and doubtful circumstantial proof, emphasizing the need for a complete and credible chain of evidence to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen theory circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC murder

Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax v. Simplex Infrastructure & Foundry Works

23 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhru · 2013:DHC:2045-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the definition of 'Consulting Engineer' under Section 65(31) of the Finance Act, 1994, as applicable during 1997-2001, does not include companies or bodies corporate.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Consulting Engineer Finance Act 1994 Section 65(31) General Clauses Act 1897

Yash Pal Saini v. Pushpa Saini and Ors.

23 Apr 2013 · A. K. Pathak · 2013:DHC:2035

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree granting possession and mesne profits to the plaintiff, rejecting defendants' claims of family settlement and joint ownership due to lack of evidence.

property appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement joint Hindu family property possession suit mesne profits

Rajender Prasad v. National Human Rights Commission

23 Apr 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2024-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contractual employment for a fixed term does not confer a right to regularization, and termination upon expiry of the contract was lawful in absence of eligibility under recruitment rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contractual employment regularization re-employment basis recruitment rules

Manohar Lal Madan v. Delhi Development Authority

23 Apr 2013 · V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2022

The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for allotment under the Rohini Residential Scheme after the Nazul Land Rules came into force is governed by the statutory Rules, allowing allotment to persons owning DDA flats or plots under 67 sq. metres.

property petition_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981 New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 Disposal of Developed Nazul Land Rules, 1981

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORP LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)

23 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhru · 2013:DHC:2038-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reopening an income tax assessment beyond four years is invalid without an allegation of failure to disclose material facts, quashing the Section 148 notice and subsequent proceedings against Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. for AY 2004-05.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 147 Income-tax Act Section 148 notice Escapement of income Failure to disclose material facts

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

23 Apr 2013 · V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2021

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's fresh writ petition for enforcement of an earlier order, holding that enforcement must be sought by alleging disobedience of the prior order and not by filing a new writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition enforcement of court order cause of action disobedience of court order

Sharma Montessori School v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Apr 2013 · V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2023

Temporary allotment of government land does not confer permanent rights, and eviction under the Public Premises Act is justified when possession is not surrendered, especially when land use is governed by a Zonal Development Plan.

property petition_dismissed Significant temporary allotment permanent allotment Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Zonal Development Plan

Arjun Dev & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.

23 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2026-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's correction limiting skilled grade pay entitlement to the date of joining or October 16, 1981, whichever is later, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.

administrative petition_dismissed skilled grade pay date of implementation pay scale entitlement Central Administrative Tribunal

Hall and Anderson Ltd and Anr v. National Textile Corporation Ltd and Anr

23 Apr 2013 · V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2033

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction to consider joint venture proposals, holding that the right of first refusal under the Supreme Court settlement arises only if the respondents intend to sell or deal with the land.

civil petition_dismissed right of first refusal settlement agreement Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1995 joint venture

DELHI CHIT FUND ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

23 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2027-DB

The Delhi High Court held that services rendered by chit fund foremen are not taxable under section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, quashing the relevant exemption notification to that extent.

tax petition_allowed Significant service tax chit fund Finance Act 1994 section 65B(44)

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)

23 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhru · 2013:DHC:2042-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Reassessment notices issued beyond six years without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing before the appellate order are time barred and invalid under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149 Section 150

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU)

23 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhru · 2013:DHC:2046-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Reassessment notices issued beyond six years without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing before the appellate order are barred by limitation and invalid under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149 Section 150

Mohd Amin Khan v. State

23 Apr 2013 · Mukta Gupta · 2013:DHC:2034

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 40 of the UAP Act for possession of a satellite phone intended for terrorism but acquitted him of charges under Sections 120B and 122 IPC due to lack of evidence of waging war.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 40 UAP Act Section 120B IPC Section 122 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Naik Sh. S.L. Mauriya v. Chairman, Gandhi Samiti & Darshan Samiti & Anr.

23 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:2037

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization of adhoc/contractual service, holding that such appointments without sanctioned posts and regular recruitment cannot be regularized as per the Supreme Court's Umadevi judgment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization adhoc appointment contractual employment sanctioned post

Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Subash Chand and Anr.

23 Apr 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2013:DHC:2040-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the equivalence of the Prathama Pariksha qualification to matriculation for promotion in a public sector bank is a matter of employer discretion and the Central Government's recognition applies only to Central Government employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant equivalence of educational qualifications promotion eligibility Prathama Pariksha matriculation

Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Subash Chand and Anr.

23 Apr 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2013:DHC:2041-DB

The Delhi High Court held that equivalence of the Prathama Pariksha qualification to matriculation for promotion in a public sector bank is a matter of employer discretion and the Central Government's recognition applies only to Central Government employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant equivalence of educational qualifications promotion eligibility Prathama Pariksha matriculation equivalence