Veena Gupta & Anr v. Ramesh Kumar Aggarwal & Ors

Delhi High Court · 25 Apr 2013 · 2013:DHC:8526
Indermeet Kaur
RC.REV.255/2012
2013:DHC:8526
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite the trial and dispose of the matter preferably within one year, emphasizing the principle of timely justice.

Full Text
Translation output
$-18 & 19 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV.255/2012
VEENA GUPTA & ANR Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sanjiv Kala-a and Mr. Atui Kumar, Advocates.
VERSUS
RAMESH KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr.G.K.Kaushik, Advocate.
RC.REV.260/2012
VEENA GUPTA & ANR Petitioner Tlirough: Mr.Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Atui Kumar, Advocates.
VERSUS
RAMESH KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr.G.K.Kaushik, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
25.04.2013 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition on merits. He, however, seeks expedition of the trial. This court has been informed that the matter is ripe for evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that they will be producing four witnesses per contra respondent shall produce three witnesses. In this scenario, trial court shall endeavor to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible preferably within one year from today.
With these directions, petition is disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR,J
APRIL 25,2013 , / , ■) nandan _ \(<^^ <^'fr^cTiC'n
Cm \in^111'k - - (^/l O'l' ^t'h&yG j&n.
2013:DHC:8526
JUDGMENT