Delhi High Court
97,710 judgments
Hari Chand v. UOI
This judgment records the hearing and pronouncement of multiple connected appeals involving the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority before the Delhi High Court.
Albert Ezung v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.
DTC v. Karan Singh
The Delhi High Court held that an employee who did not complete 10 years of qualifying service excluding leave without pay is not entitled to pensionary benefits despite acceptance of voluntary retirement under the pension scheme.
Hira Prasad Mishra v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the order summoning additional accused by the Sessions Court without following the procedure under Section 319 CrPC or making a reference to the High Court, reaffirming the binding precedent in Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab.
Through v. STATE
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping for ransom and conspiracy against three appellants while acquitting two others due to insufficient evidence.
Usha Dixit v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to re-examine the petitioner’s eligibility for a housing plot under the MIG category based on verified income documents and pass a reasoned order.
Jai Pal Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that an employee who has not completed 10 years of qualifying service excluding leave without pay is not entitled to pension under DTC rules, and dismissed the petition seeking pension benefits.
Pinki Chauhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to an employee accused of involvement in a fraudulent overseas employment scheme, finding insufficient prima facie evidence against her and emphasizing cooperation with investigation.
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Ramesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in an NDPS case, holding that prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of contraband and voluntariness of confession beyond reasonable doubt.
Hira Prasad Mishra v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the Sessions Court cannot summon additional accused after committal except under Section 319 CrPC or by making a reference to the High Court, setting aside the impugned summoning order and remitting the matter for compliance with this procedure.
Hira Prasad Mishra v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that after committal, additional accused can only be summoned under Section 319 CrPC or by High Court reference as per Ranjit Singh, setting aside the ASJ's direct summoning order.
Hira Prasad Mishra v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the order summoning additional accused directly by the Sessions Court post-committal, directing adherence to the procedure under Section 319 CrPC and the Supreme Court's ruling in Ranjit Singh.
ISRAEL MILITARY INDUSTRIES LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the termination and debarment order against Israel Military Industries Ltd. for breach of natural justice and directed reconsideration after a fair hearing.
Shalimar Paints v. Balaji Paints & Hardware
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-prosecution due to unintentional absence and restored the case for trial on merits.
Securities & Exchange Board of India v. CRB Capital Markets Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a Committee to wind up the CRB Mutual Fund scheme, disposed of related applications as infructuous, and clarified rights regarding share transfers, dividend payments, and temporary court-appointed staff claims.
Securities & Exchange Board of India v. CRB Capital Markets Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a Committee to wind up CRB Mutual Fund, authorized certification of securities and asset realization, disposed of pending share transfer and dividend claims subject to Committee's directions, and ruled on temporary employment claims related to the Provisional Administrator.
Securities & Exchange Board of India v. CRB Capital Markets Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a Committee to wind up the CRB Mutual Fund scheme, directing it to certify securities and adjudicate claims, while dismissing related applications as infructuous.
Hari Chand Thru L.R's v. UOI
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation at Rs. 12,000 per bigha for land acquired in Village Aali in 1964, emphasizing reliance on bona fide sale transactions or awards in the same or adjoining villages and rejecting claims based on non-adjacent land valuations.
Krishan Kumar Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that a flat allottee cannot be charged increased rates due to DDA’s internal delay and must be charged rates prevailing when his priority matured.
Hari Chand v. UOI
This judgment records the pronouncement of multiple connected appeals involving the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority before the Delhi High Court on May 29, 2013.