Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
LR of deceased v. Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying eviction execution until March 2026.
Shri Ravi Arora v. Shri Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and filing an undertaking, staying the eviction order until March 2026.
Khursheed Alam v. Mithlesh
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and filing an undertaking, staying eviction until 31.01.2026.
Dr. Pawan Kumar Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from the Tribunal's order, and directed payment at 7.5% per annum with escalation to 12% for prolonged delay.
Meenu Saluja v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Amandeep Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim bail granted to an accused in a murder case on compassionate grounds related to his child's Board Examination, emphasizing the balance between accused's rights and public interest.
Mohd Shoeb Ali v. The Banking Ombudsman & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Banking Ombudsman to decide the petitioner's cyber fraud complaint within eight weeks, treating the writ petition as a representation, without adjudicating on the merits.
Abhishek Gupta v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a bank's fraud classification order for non-supply of the forensic audit report to the account holder, directing fresh consideration after affording an opportunity to respond.
Nakul Manuja v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning an erroneous deposit by treating it as a representation and directed the respondent authority to decide the matter expeditiously with procedural fairness.
Kundan Kumar @ Gore v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, holding that no mandatory Section 41A CrPC notice was issued before arrest and that disclosure statements of co-accused without corroboration are insufficient to deny bail during ongoing investigation.
Rattan India Power Ltd v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award based on admissions in minutes of meetings and issuance of C-forms, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rajesh Breja v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a criminal conspiracy case, holding that mere apprehensions without concrete evidence cannot justify denial of bail once investigation is complete and charge sheet filed.
C Sharma v. Navdeep Singh & Ors.
The High Court upheld the dismissal of a criminal complaint and revision petition due to inherently improbable allegations and lack of sufficient grounds to summon the accused.
Sanjay Sushil Bhosale v. Yogesh Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that summons were duly served and no sufficient cause was shown for non-appearance.
Psychotropic India Limited v. Meridian Medicare Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled respondent's trademark 'TROMA' for pharmaceutical goods, holding it deceptively similar and dishonestly adopted, affirming petitioner's prior rights.
Under Armour Inc. v. Ashwani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar 'AU' trademark registration in favour of Under Armour Inc., affirming the petitioner's prior rights and ordering rectification of the trademark register.
Chintala Rama Mohan Rao v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in a business dispute involving stone crushing units, holding that prima facie offences were made out and the criminal case could proceed.
Greesh Verma Jairath v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs alleging molestation and intimidation in a family property dispute, holding that the allegations prima facie disclose offences and are not malicious or frivolous.
Anwar Shekh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for compensation for malicious prosecution under Article 226, holding that such claims require detailed factual adjudication in appropriate forums and cannot be decided in writ proceedings without incontrovertible evidence of fundamental rights violations.
Dr. Smita Naram v. Registrar of Trademarks
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a trademark opposition for non-prosecution due to non-receipt of hearing notices and restored the opposition for fresh hearing.
Puneet Solanki v. Nidhi Solanki
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim maintenance granted under the Domestic Violence Act, holding that detailed financial contentions are to be considered at the final stage and not at the interim maintenance stage.