Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

M/S ISMARTU INDIA PVT. LTD. v. Union of India

07 Mar 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:1478-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a second Show Cause Notice under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act as impermissible change of opinion and lacking required particulars of suppression or collusion.

tax petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28(1) Section 28(4) Show Cause Notice

Ishart Jahan v. Syed Shah Badar Hussan Sabri

07 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1576

The High Court held it lacks jurisdiction under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act to entertain revision against interlocutory orders rejecting applications under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC in eviction proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25-B eviction petition Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC

NTPC Limited v. Starcon Infra Projects India Pvt Ltd

07 Mar 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:1572

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's order rejecting amendment or withdrawal of claims under Section 23(3) is a procedural order, not an interim award, and thus not challengeable under Section 34 before the final award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 23(3) Section 34 interim award

Sh. Dalip Puri v. Ritu Malhotra

07 Mar 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:1573

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Will excluding the plaintiff from inheritance, dismissing his suit for partition due to lack of proof of forgery or mental incapacity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will validity Testamentary capacity Indian Succession Act Section 63 Indian Evidence Act Section 114

SSC and Anr. v. Garima

07 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1530-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the SSC’s writ petition and upheld the Tribunal’s order directing a fresh medical examination for a candidate temporarily disqualified due to a fractured ankle.

administrative appeal_dismissed medical examination recruitment temporary unfitness fractured ankle

Balvantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Anguri Devi Shersingh Memorial Academy v. Undeda Nickat

07 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1529-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's withdrawn appeal and granted a strict two-week extension to comply with the Single Judge's judgment.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal extension of time compliance with judgment Letters Patent Appeal

Saraswati Devi v. State Bank of India

07 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1563

The Delhi High Court directed SBI to decide the petitioner’s representation for compensation arising from her police officer husband’s death within two weeks, granting liberty to approach the court again if aggrieved.

civil other Procedural writ petition State Bank of India police official death policy claim

K W/O P v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr

07 Mar 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:1550
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interim compensation for sexual offence victims must consider medical and socio-economic factors and directed the DLSA to reconsider the petitioner's application after acknowledging the charge-sheet filed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim compensation victim compensation sexual offences Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme 2018

Ashok Kumar v. Harish Kumar

07 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1540

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner an extension to vacate tenanted premises until 30.09.2025 on condition of payment of monthly user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying eviction execution till that date.

property petition_allowed eviction order extension of possession user and occupation charges undertaking

Narender Kumar v. Saroj Garg

07 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1539

The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate premises until 31.12.2025 on condition of paying monthly user charges and filing an undertaking, staying the eviction order subject to compliance.

property appeal_allowed eviction order extension of time user and occupation charges vacant possession

Airport Authority of India v. Mumbai International Airport Limited & Anr

07 Mar 2025 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2025:DHC:1522
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award excusing MIAL from Annual Fee payments during COVID-19 Force Majeure period and extending the OMDA term, rejecting AAI's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Force Majeure Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Annual Fee

Airports Authority of India v. Delhi International Airport Limited & Anr

07 Mar 2025 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2025:DHC:1523
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award excusing DIAL from Annual Fee payments under the OMDA during COVID-19 Force Majeure, rejecting AAI's challenge for patent illegality and contract misinterpretation.

commercial_arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Force Majeure Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Operation Management and Development Agreement Annual Fee

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. v. Prakash Singh & Ors.

07 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1519

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award granting compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act despite prior Workmen Compensation payment, affirming negligence and insurance liability notwithstanding a fake driving license.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 167 M.V. Act compensation

Cholamandalam MS Gen Ins Co. Ltd. v. Praveen Kumar Singh; Tulsi Bisht v. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.

07 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1518

Delhi High Court upheld sole negligence of offending truck driver in a fatal motor accident, reduced future prospects to 40%, and enhanced compensation to legal heirs from Rs.31.57 lakh to Rs.42.46 lakh with 8% interest.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant motor accident claim negligence future prospects loss of consortium

PCIT-1, NEW DELHI v. BEAM GLOBAL SPIRITS & WINE (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

07 Mar 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that AMP expenditure cannot be treated as an international transaction for transfer pricing adjustments absent tangible evidence of an agreement or arrangement obliging such expenditure for the foreign associated enterprise.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Advertising Marketing and Promotion (AMP) expenditure International transaction Transfer pricing Bright line test

TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. MALLA RAJIV

07 Mar 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2153
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Tata Sons for trademark infringement and passing off against defendant selling deceptively similar packaged water under 'JK COPPER+ WATER', awarding injunction, damages, and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

Suresh Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1477-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that for ACP and MACP benefits, service must be reckoned from initial appointment ignoring re-mustering promotions where posts were merged, directing grant of benefits and arrears to petitioners.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation re-mustering

Sumit Kumar Ghosh v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr

06 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1476-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that for ACP and MACP benefits, service must be reckoned from initial appointment ignoring intermediate promotions merged in hierarchy, directing grant of benefits and arrears to the petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression (ACP) Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) service reckoning re-mustering

CPL Chandra Prakash Chhipa (Retd) v. Union of India and Ors

06 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1474-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging retrospective pension policy implementation, holding that the Armed Forces Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over such service matters.

administrative appeal_dismissed Armed Forces Tribunal writ jurisdiction prorata pension condonation of shortfall

Rahul Singh v. Border Security Force & Anr.

06 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1488-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a BSF officer is not entitled to training allowance after being relieved from Instructor duties post-promotion, but excess payments made without fault cannot be recovered without due process.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant training allowance empanelment Instructor duties administrative posting