Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Modern Credit Private Limited v. Micra Soft Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors based on their written consents and noting absence of secured creditors.
M/S DABUR INDIA LTD. v. RHIM PHARMACEUTICALS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Dabur India Ltd. against Rhim Pharmaceuticals for infringing its registered trademark, design, and trade dress of 'Dabur Lal Dant Manjan' packaging.
Om Prakash v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 397 IPC, holding that a blade not designed as a deadly weapon and causing no injury does not attract enhanced punishment under that section.
Kamal Mehta v. Shanti Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court’s decree on admissions based on a Relinquishment Deed and upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s review application relying on an unpleaded Settlement Deed.
M/S IFCI FACTORS LIMITED v. JAGANNATH SARANGAPANI & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted defendants unconditional leave to defend a suit under Order 37 CPC based on personal guarantees, holding that triable issues including non-joinder and disputed liquidated demand preclude summary judgment.
Manoj Kumar Verma v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on a reliable dying declaration despite procedural irregularities and minor contradictions in evidence.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sh. Fazlu Rahman Ansari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer’s appeal, setting aside compensation granted under the Employee’s Compensation Act due to lack of credible evidence proving employer-employee relationship and occurrence of accident.
The Commissioner, KVS v. Ashok Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of a dismissal order due to vitiated disciplinary enquiry conducted in the employee's absence, directing fresh enquiry ensuring natural justice.
Satish and Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court converted appellant Satish's murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to sudden quarrel and lack of common intention, while upholding appellant Subhash's conviction for causing injuries.
Dharamwati v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted husband and wife appellants of rape and related charges due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical and forensic evidence, emphasizing the need for credible and trustworthy sole prosecutrix testimony for conviction.
Bhagwan Dass v. State
The Delhi High Court disposed of Bhagwan Dass's criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related case on the same day.
Raj Kumar @ Navvya v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld robbery convictions under Section 392 IPC but set aside enhanced punishment under Section 397 IPC due to lack of evidence of use of deadly weapons, modifying the sentence accordingly.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint against a petitioner under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that mere directorship or equity stake without responsibility for company affairs does not attract criminal liability.
Moonish Ahmed v. Halima
The Delhi High Court dismissed the employer’s appeal under the Employee’s Compensation Act, affirming liability to pay compensation and interest to a worker injured during employment despite denial of the employment relationship.
Dorling Kindersley (India) Private Limited v. Others
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after addressing compliance issues and modifying the appointed date to 01.04.2013.
Trimex International FZE v. Jayswals Neco Ltd
The Delhi High Court modified an arbitral award on penalty for under-sized metallurgical coke, holding the petitioner and another entity as joint promisors liable and affirming penalty computation based on both load and discharge port analyses as per contract terms.
Anup Sharma & Ors v. Nagendra Prasad Yadav
The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance and permanent injunction in favor of plaintiffs against a defendant who failed to execute a sale deed despite readiness and willingness of the plaintiffs to pay the balance consideration.
Madhav Fincap Private Limited v. Baba Lease and Investment Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing continued compliance with RBI regulations and directors' liability for statutory breaches.
Union of India v. Kalimata Ispat India (P) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld the arbitration award enforcing the contractual payment of Rs. 2.74 per ERC Mark-III, finding no error apparent on the face of the record.
Vishal Singh and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that supersession of a cooperative society's Board under Section 123 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, is justified in exceptional circumstances supported by credible investigations, with flexible application of natural justice.