Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Supreme Payment Services Private Limited & Anr. v. United Forex Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the first motion application for a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents and directing specific notice to a secured creditor at the second motion stage.
System Builders and Developers Private Limited v. Gemstar Builders & Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents.
Pearson India Private Limited v. Others
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and addressing concerns of the Regional Director and Official Liquidator.
World Wide Finvest and Leasing Limited v. Others
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, subject to compliance with RBI regulations and statutory requirements, allowing pending share application money to be carried forward with appropriate undertakings.
Nawab Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding the appellant failed to prove he was a bonafide passenger or that an untoward incident occurred.
NCS Pearson (India) Private Limited v. Others
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring statutory compliance and creditor approval, modifying the appointed date to 01.04.2013.
ESCORTS LTD. v. PRAKASH CHAND PATIDAR
The High Court allowed the appeal and restored the complaint under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dismissed for non-prosecution due to the complainant's non-appearance, emphasizing adjudication on merits.
Mahmood & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 498A/34 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served in custody following a genuine compromise between the parties.
Controls & Switchgear Contactors Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 3(1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that commission paid to directors for furnishing personal guarantees is a genuine business expense deductible under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act and not disallowable as dividend distribution.
Jai Prakash @ Ajay v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for robbery under Section 392/34 IPC based on credible eyewitness identification and recoveries despite minor discrepancies and absence of TIP.
Jai Prakash @ Ajay v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for robbery under Section 392/34 IPC, holding that minor discrepancies in witness testimony and absence of TIP did not vitiate the prosecution case.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint against the petitioner under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that mere directorship or shareholding without specific allegations of control and responsibility does not attract criminal liability.
Jawahar Singh Tomar v. Director of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to comply with interim and final court orders entitles an employee to back wages despite delay in re-employment, rejecting employer's reliance on Fundamental Rule 17 and constructive res judicata.
Pt. Gopal Prasad Shastri & Anr. v. Subhash Chand Verma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree due to lack of proof of compromise and failure to appear despite summons.
Anwar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted under Section 392/34 IPC due to unreliable identification and suspicious recovery evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proper TIP and credible recovery procedures.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Noordin
The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders directing de-sealing of properties sealed arbitrarily by the municipal authority without due process, emphasizing the protection of lawful possession and balance of convenience.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Noordin
The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders directing de-sealing of properties sealed arbitrarily by the municipal authority without due process, emphasizing the balance of convenience in favor of lawful possessors.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Noordin
The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders directing de-sealing of properties sealed arbitrarily by the municipal authority without due procedure, emphasizing possession and lawful allotment as key factors for interim relief.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Noordin
The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders directing de-sealing of properties sealed arbitrarily by the municipal authority without due process, emphasizing lawful possession and balance of convenience.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Noordin
The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders directing de-sealing of properties sealed arbitrarily by the municipal authority without due process, emphasizing the allottee's possession and balance of convenience.