Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

R.P. Tolani v. UOI

23 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2765-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that ITAT Vice-President appointments are by promotion based on merit alone, and quashed the selection for being perverse due to reliance solely on ACRs without independent assessment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Vice-President appointment promotion by selection merit vs seniority

Avant Garde Clean Room & Engg Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Ind Swift Limited

23 May 2014 · Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:2771

The Delhi High Court held that a contract clause providing exclusive jurisdiction to courts, despite using the word 'arbitration' in its heading, does not constitute a valid arbitration agreement under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act exclusive jurisdiction clause intention to arbitrate

Jumbo Chemicals and Allied Industries Private Limited v. M/S Arjun Industries Limited

22 May 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2014:DHC:2736

The Delhi High Court dismissed the winding up petition against a company on disputed debt and non-commencement grounds, emphasizing the need for clear inability to pay and reasonable hope of revival before ordering winding up.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up Companies Act 1956 inability to pay debts non-commencement of business

Sapan Chopra & Anr. v. M/S Ultimate Builders and Developer (P) Ltd.

22 May 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2729-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the contract involving sale and renovation could not be specifically enforced at the original sale consideration due to conditional novation and lack of readiness to perform by the buyer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance novation sale consideration continuous supervision

Firoz and Another v. The State

22 May 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:2732

The Delhi High Court upheld the robbery convictions based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence but set aside the fine imposed under Section 397 IPC, modifying the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery identification Section 397 IPC minimum sentence

Maya Devi v. Union of India

22 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2746

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the deceased passenger's mother, holding that the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim based on irrelevant and perverse findings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 compensation bonafide passenger

Juhi Parveen & Anr. v. Union of India

22 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2744

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal awarding statutory compensation to the widow and minor child of a deceased passenger who fell from a train, holding Railways liable despite discrepancies in train numbers and loss of ticket.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 statutory compensation bona fide passenger

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-III v. M/S Flakes-N-Flavourz New Delhi

22 May 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:2745-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Settlement Commission's order allowing deduction under Section 80-IB, holding that judicial interference is limited to cases of arbitrariness or perversity.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 80-IB deduction judicial review Article 226

Ati Ram Singh v. M/S. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

22 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2741
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed beyond the 120-day limitation period after proper service of the arbitral award are barred and cannot be entertained.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Arbitral award

Sher Khan v. The State

22 May 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:2735

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 392/397/34 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite non-recovery of weapon and delay in arrest, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Sections 392/397/34 IPC eyewitness identification medical evidence

Radhehsh Singh v. Vineet Singh & Ors.

22 May 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:2730

The Delhi High Court held that a bona fide compromise decree in a partition suit binds the parties despite non-stamping and non-registration, and non-execution bars only the remedy, not the rights adjudicated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise decree partition suit non-stamping non-registration

B.R.L. Saxena v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

22 May 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:2731

The Delhi High Court set aside a disciplinary order imposing pension penalty on an employee due to breach of natural justice for non-supply of inquiry report and non-communication of reasons, directing refund of pension deductions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant principles of natural justice disciplinary proceedings inquiry report pension penalty

Dr. Shahnawaj v. State

22 May 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:2750

The court held that a person cannot be declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C. without strict compliance with procedural requirements, and Section 174A IPC applies only after such declaration, thus upholding cancellation of NBWs and granting bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 82 Cr.P.C. Proclaimed offender Section 174A IPC Non-bailable warrant

SMT. Saroj & Ors. v. Union of India

22 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2738

The Delhi High Court allowed substitution of legal heirs in a Railway Claims Tribunal claim, holding that the Tribunal has power to condone delay under its procedural rules and inherent powers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal substitution of legal heirs condonation of delay Rule 26 proviso

STI INDIA LTD v. M/S STI SANOH INDIA LTD

22 May 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:2753

The High Court set aside the order permitting the AGM for appointment of statutory auditors and remanded the matter to the Company Law Board to reconsider the appointment in light of contractual rights and quorum requirements.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Joint Venture Agreement Statutory Auditors Annual General Meeting Quorum

Kartar Singh v. Union of India

22 May 2014 · Manmohan J · 2014:DHC:2734

The Delhi High Court set aside the expulsion of Kartar Singh by the Wrestling Federation of India and appointed a retired judge to conduct a binding inquiry, permitting the petitioner to contest elections pending the inquiry.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant expulsion resolution Wrestling Federation of India Inquiry Officer retired judge

Radhey Shyam and Another v. Kamaljeet Singh Bhatia

22 May 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:2743

The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance in favor of plaintiffs for a property sale agreement where the defendant failed to execute the sale deed despite receipt of earnest money and plaintiffs' readiness to pay the balance.

civil appeal_allowed specific performance agreement to sell earnest money property sale

M/S SANTOSH TIMBER TRADING CO LTD v. M/S MAXWELL PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES & ANRS

22 May 2014 · G.S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:2740

The Delhi High Court decreed a recovery suit for unpaid goods supplied, allowing ex parte proceedings due to defendants' non-appearance and confirmed jurisdiction based on transaction facts.

civil appeal_allowed recovery suit ex parte decree dishonoured cheques Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Jai Kishan Khanna v. Shantnu Appt. Coop Group Housing Society Registration No. 1111

22 May 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:2739-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an appeal against deemed approval of expulsion under Section 86(3) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act is maintainable if filed within 60 days after the 180-day period expires, setting aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal as premature.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Section 86 expulsion of member deemed approval

Ishpinder Kochhar v. Deluxe Dentelles (P) Ltd & Anr

22 May 2014 · V. K. Shali · 2014:DHC:2749

The Delhi High Court held that discovery under Order 11 CPC cannot be compelled for documents pertaining to non-parties, and set aside the order directing production of such documents relating to third-party companies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 11 CPC discovery of documents interrogatories third party documents