Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Efacec Swithgear India Pvt. Ltd. v. Efacec India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the application for a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Lalit Kumar Choudhary v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pay cannot be revised to an employee's detriment nor recoveries made without issuing a show cause notice and opportunity to be heard, quashing the impugned pay revision order.
Anita v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that adverse pay fixation and salary recovery require prior notice and opportunity to be heard, quashing the respondents' unilateral downward revision of the petitioner's pay and recovery without such procedure.
Gulshan Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pay fixation cannot be revised to an employee's detriment without issuing a show cause notice and opportunity to be heard, and salary recoveries without fraud or misrepresentation are impermissible without due process.
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd v. Vikas Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to defend in a summary suit under Order 37 CPC for recovery of a home equity loan, holding that the defence was sham and the suit maintainable on a liquidated demand.
Asif v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Section 397 IPC for lack of evidence of use of deadly weapon but upheld robbery convictions under Section 394 IPC, modifying sentences accordingly.
Harish & Ors. v. Sarla Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding possession decree where government had not taken possession under Land Acquisition Act, death of proforma defendant did not cause abatement, and suit property was sufficiently demarcated.
Dharmender Kumar Sharma v. Chairman, Rajya Sabha Secretariat & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary orders holding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and upheld compulsory retirement, emphasizing limited judicial interference in departmental proceedings.
Vinod Kumar Aggarwal v. Shakuntla Kapoor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a legal notice terminating tenancy was duly served, tenancy devolves only on limited heirs under Section 2(l) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, and granted possession to the landlord after the death of the tenant's spouse.
Bidhan Chand Biswas through LRs v. Prakash Chand Bansal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the first appellate court's declaration of ownership in favor of the plaintiffs, holding that a power of attorney executed for consideration cannot be unilaterally cancelled and that the plaintiffs had better title than the defendants.
Davinder Kumar v. Ram Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal, upholding possession and damages decreed in favor of the respondent, holding that the appellant failed to prove adoption or co-ownership of the suit property.
Holland Company LP & Anr v. S.P. Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction against the defendant for alleged copyright infringement of Automatic Twist Lock designs, holding that design registration application surrenders copyright and no prima facie case was made out.
CTCI Overseas Corporation Ltd v. Director of Income Tax-I, International Taxation
The Delhi High Court set aside the Authority for Advance Rulings' finding of an Association of Persons between the petitioner and CINDA, remitting the matter for fresh factual determination applying clarified legal principles on AOP under the Income Tax Act.
Dharmender Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and condoned a 227-day delay in filing a Railway Claims Tribunal petition, emphasizing that claims should be decided on merits rather than dismissed on technical grounds.
Khem Chand v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of a Scheduled Caste candidate whose experience certificate was improperly discredited by the appointing authority despite valid documentary evidence and firm confirmations.
Syed Mohd. Jawed Alam v. The General Manager Northern Railways
The Delhi High Court upheld the acceptance of the petitioner's voluntary retirement under Rule 67 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993, holding that failure to withdraw the notice and deemed acceptance after three months rendered the retirement valid.
Saint Soldier Modern Senior Secondary School v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court held that the Employees’ Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal has no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 120 days as prescribed under the Act and Rules, dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation.
Abhishek Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that government employees' pay cannot be arbitrarily reduced or recovered without issuing a show cause notice and providing an opportunity to be heard, quashing the impugned pay re-fixation order against the petitioner.
Jitendra Ray v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pay cannot be revised to an employee's detriment without issuing a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing, and recovery of excess salary without fraud is impermissible without due process.
S.S. Suhag & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that government employees' pay cannot be reduced or recovered without a reasoned show cause notice and opportunity to be heard, quashing arbitrary pay re-fixation orders against CRPF Head Constables.