Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Kiran Arora v. Sandeep Poshwal & Ors.

23 May 2014 · G.S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:2773

The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for permanent injunction protecting the plaintiff's possession of a shop after defendants failed to file a written statement despite repeated opportunities.

civil appeal_allowed permanent injunction Order 8 Rule 10 CPC failure to file written statement peaceful possession

The Federation of Hotels & Restaurants Association of India v. MCD

23 May 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:2792

The Delhi High Court modified interim orders to require 3 to 5 star hotels to pay property tax using a multiplying user factor of 4 and 10% tax rate pending final adjudication, in light of the Division Bench's validation of the amended tax scheme.

administrative other Significant property tax Delhi Municipal Corporation Amendment Act 2003 Section 116(E) Unit Area Method

Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations v. Director General of Income Tax

23 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vibhu BakhrU · 2014:DHC:2769-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an educational institution generating incidental surpluses for furthering its educational objectives is entitled to exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, and procedural lapses in expenditure do not negate exemption.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 10(23C)(vi) Income Tax Act educational institution exemption predominant object test surplus income

Sanjay Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax

23 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vibhu BakhrU · 2014:DHC:2766-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the block period under the Income Tax Act ends on the date of requisition under Section 132A, not on the date of receipt of seized assets, and remanded the assessment and penalty for reconsideration accordingly.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Block Period Section 132A Section 158B

Sunil Kumar Yadav v. UOI and Ors.

23 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2757-DB

Sanjay Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax

23 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vibhu BakhrU · 2014:DHC:2767-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the block period under the Income Tax Act ends on the date of requisition under Section 132A, not on the date of execution of the warrant or receipt of seized assets, and remanded the matter for reassessment accordingly.

tax appeal_allowed Significant block period Section 132A Section 158B undisclosed income

M/S MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO. LTD v. GOVT. OF NCT

23 May 2014 · V. KAMESWAR RAO · 2014:DHC:2776

Delhi High Court held that a Regional Research Manager engaged in specialized supervisory and research duties is not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, and upheld his dismissal for abandonment of service, setting aside the Labour Court's reinstatement order.

labor appeal_allowed Significant workman definition Industrial Disputes Act 1947 supervisory duties abandonment of service

Anju v. Union of India

23 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2783

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the widow of a deceased bona fide passenger who fell from a train, emphasizing the importance of credible eyewitness evidence in railway accident claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident bona fide passenger

Mohd. Inam v. The Senior Divisional Manager & Ors.

23 May 2014 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:2789-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the pay fixation of a reappointed Development Officer to a Class III post must not exceed the pay drawn at termination, and the appellant was not entitled to higher pay than fixed.

service_law appeal_dismissed pay fixation Development Officer Class III post Life Insurance Corporation

Urmila Devi v. Department of Women and Child Development

23 May 2014 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:2790-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld recruitment rules prescribing age relaxation limits for anganwadi workers, dismissing appeals challenging the Industrial Tribunal's order that exceeded its jurisdiction by invalidating those limits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant anganwadi workers promotion Supervisor post age relaxation

Amrendra Kumar v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court & Ors.

23 May 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:2781-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed application of 3% horizontal reservation for persons with disabilities on total cadre vacancies in the 2014 Delhi Judicial Service Examination, reinforcing the Supreme Court's mandate against deferring reserved posts.

administrative petition_allowed Significant persons with disabilities 3% reservation horizontal reservation Delhi Judicial Service Examination

Rama Goel v. Gujranwala Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd

23 May 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:2782

The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, declaring her rightful owner of the flat and directing the society to transfer ownership and issue a No Objection Certificate, holding that forged documents registered by defendants were null and void.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ownership flat cooperative housing society fraud

Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. M/S. CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

23 May 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; VIBHU BAKHRU · 2014:DHC:2764-DB

The High Court clarified the distinct roles of the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer in transfer pricing disputes, remanding the matter for proper arm's length price determination and allowing the AO to verify the genuineness of expenses.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Transfer Pricing Arm's Length Price Associated Enterprises International Transactions

Shahabuddin v. State NCT of Delhi

23 May 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:2768

The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction under Sections 392/34 IPC but granted release considering the period already served and mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 392 IPC Robbery Common intention Leniency in sentencing

Sh. Tek Chand v. Union of India and Anr.

23 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2777

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that courts cannot interfere with disciplinary punishment not challenged in pleadings unless it shocks judicial conscience, thereby upholding dismissal of the employee for overstaying leave.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings quantum of punishment natural justice reinstatement

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Satender Kumar and Anr.

23 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2780

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal, upholding compensation to a bus driver injured in an accident, holding that negligence alone does not bar compensation without proof of wilful disobedience and that minimum wages fixed by the government can be used for compensation calculation.

labor appeal_dismissed Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 wilful disobedience negligence minimum wages

J.P. Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority

23 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2779

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that class-I legal heirs have superior rights over class-II heirs in property registration transfer, and concurrent factual findings against the appellant were not interfered with.

civil appeal_dismissed class-I legal heirs class-II legal heirs transfer of property registration Delhi Development Authority

Rizwan @ Bhura v. State of Delhi

23 May 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:2770

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for armed robbery while setting aside the impermissible fine under Section 397 IPC, affirming that minor discrepancies and co-accused acquittal do not vitiate specific evidence against the appellant.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC Section 25 Arms Act

Prahlad Singh & Anr. v. Union of India

23 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2778

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the deceased passenger's parents, holding Railways strictly liable under the Railways Act despite absence of ticket recovery and rejecting the suicide/run over theory.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act, 1989 strict liability bonafide passenger compensation

Sandeep Kumar & Ors. v. Delhi Fire Service & Ors.

23 May 2014 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:2784-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of candidates who failed the driving skill test in Fire Operator recruitment, holding the evaluation criteria valid and allegations of manipulation unsubstantiated.

administrative petition_dismissed driving skill test recruitment rules qualifying test grading system